diff options
author | Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> | 2020-02-14 17:03:12 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> | 2020-02-14 17:19:22 -0800 |
commit | 3dbae15538972c9e1578cb216964c2840361a538 (patch) | |
tree | b6d2c378ceca6d49e82f838bc6a0a7120600c4d5 /crypto | |
parent | 94bef5d57992f9e987a9b7e8fa736ee204ac4f7a (diff) | |
download | linux-3dbae15538972c9e1578cb216964c2840361a538.tar.bz2 |
Input: cyapa - replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214172132.GA28389@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'crypto')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions