[IA64] Change default PSR.ac from '1' to '0' (Fix erratum #237)

April 2014 Itanium processor specification update:

http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/itanium/itanium-specification-update.html

describes this erratum:

=========================================================================
237. Under a complex set of conditions, store to load forwarding for a
sub 8-byte load may complete incorrectly

Problem: A load instruction may complete incorrectly when a code sequence
using 4-byte or smaller load and store operations to the same address
is executed in combination with specific timing of all the following
concurrent conditions: store to load forwarding, alignment checking
enabled, a mis-predicted branch, and complex cache utilization activity.

Implication: The affected sub 8-byte instruction may complete
incorrectly resulting in unpredictable system behavior. There is an
extremely low probability of exposure due to the significant number of
complex microarchitectural concurrent conditions required to encounter
the erratum.

Workaround: Set PSR.ac = 0 to completely avoid the erratum. Disabling
Hyper-Threading will significantly reduce exposure to the conditions
that contribute to encountering the erratum.

Status: See the Summary Table of Changes for the affected steppings.
=========================================================================

[Table of changes essentially lists all models from McKinley to Tukwila]

The PSR.ac bit controls whether the processor will always generate
an unaligned reference trap (0x5a00) for a misaligned data access
(when PSR.ac=1) or if it will let the access succeed when running
on a cpu that implements logic to handle some unaligned accesses.

Way back in 2008 in commit b704882e70d87d7f56db5ff17e2253f3fa90e4f3
  [IA64] Rationalize kernel mode alignment checking
we made the decision to always enable strict checking. We were
already doing so in trap/interrupt context because the common
preamble code set this bit - but the rest of supervisor code
(and by inheritance user code) ran with PSR.ac=0.

We now reverse that decision and set PSR.ac=0 everywhere in the
kernel (also inherited by user processes). This will avoid the
erratum using the method described in the Itanium specification
update.  Net effect for users is that the processor will handle
unaligned access when it can (typically with a tiny performance
bubble in the pipeline ... but much less invasive than taking a
trap and having the OS perform the access).

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

3 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/head.S b/arch/ia64/kernel/head.S
index e6f80fcf013b..a4acddad0c78 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/head.S
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/head.S
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ start_ap:
 	 * Switch into virtual mode:
 	 */
 	movl r16=(IA64_PSR_IT|IA64_PSR_IC|IA64_PSR_DT|IA64_PSR_RT|IA64_PSR_DFH|IA64_PSR_BN \
-		  |IA64_PSR_DI|IA64_PSR_AC)
+		  |IA64_PSR_DI)
 	;;
 	mov cr.ipsr=r16
 	movl r17=1f
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S b/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S
index 689ffcaa284e..18e794a57248 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S
+++ b/arch/ia64/kernel/ivt.S
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
 #include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include <asm/errno.h>
 
-#if 1
+#if 0
 # define PSR_DEFAULT_BITS	psr.ac
 #else
 # define PSR_DEFAULT_BITS	0
diff --git a/arch/ia64/kvm/vmm_ivt.S b/arch/ia64/kvm/vmm_ivt.S
index 24018484c6e9..397e34a63e18 100644
--- a/arch/ia64/kvm/vmm_ivt.S
+++ b/arch/ia64/kvm/vmm_ivt.S
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 #include "kvm_minstate.h"
 #include "vti.h"
 
-#if 1
+#if 0
 # define PSR_DEFAULT_BITS   psr.ac
 #else
 # define PSR_DEFAULT_BITS   0