summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>2018-05-24 12:26:46 +0530
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>2018-05-24 09:20:48 +0200
commit4ea69b2fd623dee2bbc77d3b6b7d8c0924e2026a (patch)
tree3f65586a10e872c08a2978c026579ea6fe432c64 /arch
parent2162fed49fa86cb3b5c296565837e674c53cc7ae (diff)
downloadlinux-4ea69b2fd623dee2bbc77d3b6b7d8c0924e2026a.tar.bz2
bpf: powerpc64: pad function address loads with NOPs
For multi-function programs, loading the address of a callee function to a register requires emitting instructions whose count varies from one to five depending on the nature of the address. Since we come to know of the callee's address only before the extra pass, the number of instructions required to load this address may vary from what was previously generated. This can make the JITed image grow or shrink. To avoid this, we should generate a constant five-instruction when loading function addresses by padding the optimized load sequence with NOPs. Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c34
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 1bdb1aff0619..e4582744a31d 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -167,25 +167,37 @@ static void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
static void bpf_jit_emit_func_call(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func)
{
+ unsigned int i, ctx_idx = ctx->idx;
+
+ /* Load function address into r12 */
+ PPC_LI64(12, func);
+
+ /* For bpf-to-bpf function calls, the callee's address is unknown
+ * until the last extra pass. As seen above, we use PPC_LI64() to
+ * load the callee's address, but this may optimize the number of
+ * instructions required based on the nature of the address.
+ *
+ * Since we don't want the number of instructions emitted to change,
+ * we pad the optimized PPC_LI64() call with NOPs to guarantee that
+ * we always have a five-instruction sequence, which is the maximum
+ * that PPC_LI64() can emit.
+ */
+ for (i = ctx->idx - ctx_idx; i < 5; i++)
+ PPC_NOP();
+
#ifdef PPC64_ELF_ABI_v1
- /* func points to the function descriptor */
- PPC_LI64(b2p[TMP_REG_2], func);
- /* Load actual entry point from function descriptor */
- PPC_BPF_LL(b2p[TMP_REG_1], b2p[TMP_REG_2], 0);
- /* ... and move it to LR */
- PPC_MTLR(b2p[TMP_REG_1]);
/*
* Load TOC from function descriptor at offset 8.
* We can clobber r2 since we get called through a
* function pointer (so caller will save/restore r2)
* and since we don't use a TOC ourself.
*/
- PPC_BPF_LL(2, b2p[TMP_REG_2], 8);
-#else
- /* We can clobber r12 */
- PPC_FUNC_ADDR(12, func);
- PPC_MTLR(12);
+ PPC_BPF_LL(2, 12, 8);
+ /* Load actual entry point from function descriptor */
+ PPC_BPF_LL(12, 12, 0);
#endif
+
+ PPC_MTLR(12);
PPC_BLRL();
}