locking/atomics: COCCINELLE/treewide: Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() patterns to READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE()

Please do not apply this to mainline directly, instead please re-run the
coccinelle script shown below and apply its output.

For several reasons, it is desirable to use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() in
preference to ACCESS_ONCE(), and new code is expected to use one of the
former. So far, there's been no reason to change most existing uses of
ACCESS_ONCE(), as these aren't harmful, and changing them results in
churn.

However, for some features, the read/write distinction is critical to
correct operation. To distinguish these cases, separate read/write
accessors must be used. This patch migrates (most) remaining
ACCESS_ONCE() instances to {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), using the following
coccinelle script:

----
// Convert trivial ACCESS_ONCE() uses to equivalent READ_ONCE() and
// WRITE_ONCE()

// $ make coccicheck COCCI=/home/mark/once.cocci SPFLAGS="--include-headers" MODE=patch

virtual patch

@ depends on patch @
expression E1, E2;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E1) = E2
+ WRITE_ONCE(E1, E2)

@ depends on patch @
expression E;
@@

- ACCESS_ONCE(E)
+ READ_ONCE(E)
----

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: shuah@kernel.org
Cc: snitzer@redhat.com
Cc: thor.thayer@linux.intel.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Cc: will.deacon@arm.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508792849-3115-19-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

2 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 7a69cf053711..a119b361b8b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ static u64 __update_clear_spte_slow(u64 *sptep, u64 spte)
 
 static u64 __get_spte_lockless(u64 *sptep)
 {
-	return ACCESS_ONCE(*sptep);
+	return READ_ONCE(*sptep);
 }
 #else
 union split_spte {
@@ -4819,7 +4819,7 @@ static void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
 	 * If we don't have indirect shadow pages, it means no page is
 	 * write-protected, so we can exit simply.
 	 */
-	if (!ACCESS_ONCE(vcpu->kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages))
+	if (!READ_ONCE(vcpu->kvm->arch.indirect_shadow_pages))
 		return;
 
 	remote_flush = local_flush = false;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
index ea67dc876316..01c1371f39f8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/page_track.c
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ bool kvm_page_track_is_active(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn,
 		return false;
 
 	index = gfn_to_index(gfn, slot->base_gfn, PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL);
-	return !!ACCESS_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
+	return !!READ_ONCE(slot->arch.gfn_track[mode][index]);
 }
 
 void kvm_page_track_cleanup(struct kvm *kvm)