summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>2019-05-23 16:35:34 +1000
committerPaul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>2019-05-29 13:44:36 +1000
commit0d4ee88d92884c661fcafd5576da243aa943dc24 (patch)
treeaceeeea58f0da9a1f928d1b52e83ebba5d90674b /arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
parentc395fe1d8e49a5aa03504fcacfb7c95b5a4c6e04 (diff)
downloadlinux-0d4ee88d92884c661fcafd5576da243aa943dc24.tar.bz2
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use new mutex to synchronize MMU setup
Currently the HV KVM code uses kvm->lock in conjunction with a flag, kvm->arch.mmu_ready, to synchronize MMU setup and hold off vcpu execution until the MMU-related data structures are ready. However, this means that kvm->lock is being taken inside vcpu->mutex, which is contrary to Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt and results in lockdep warnings. To fix this, we add a new mutex, kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock, which nests inside the vcpu mutexes, and is taken in the places where kvm->lock was taken that are related to MMU setup. Additionally we take the new mutex in the vcpu creation code at the point where we are creating a new vcore, in order to provide mutual exclusion with kvmppc_update_lpcr() and ensure that an update to kvm->arch.lpcr doesn't get missed, which could otherwise lead to a stale vcore->lpcr value. Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c36
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
index ab3d484c5e2e..51971311e6c9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct kvm_resize_hpt {
struct work_struct work;
u32 order;
- /* These fields protected by kvm->lock */
+ /* These fields protected by kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock */
/* Possible values and their usage:
* <0 an error occurred during allocation,
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct kvm_resize_hpt {
int error;
/* Private to the work thread, until error != -EBUSY,
- * then protected by kvm->lock.
+ * then protected by kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock.
*/
struct kvm_hpt_info hpt;
};
@@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ long kvmppc_alloc_reset_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, int order)
long err = -EBUSY;
struct kvm_hpt_info info;
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
if (kvm->arch.mmu_ready) {
kvm->arch.mmu_ready = 0;
/* order mmu_ready vs. vcpus_running */
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ out:
/* Ensure that each vcpu will flush its TLB on next entry. */
cpumask_setall(&kvm->arch.need_tlb_flush);
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
return err;
}
@@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void resize_hpt_pivot(struct kvm_resize_hpt *resize)
static void resize_hpt_release(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_resize_hpt *resize)
{
- if (WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&kvm->lock)))
+ if (WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock)))
return;
if (!resize)
@@ -1474,14 +1474,14 @@ static void resize_hpt_prepare_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (WARN_ON(resize->error != -EBUSY))
return;
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
/* Request is still current? */
if (kvm->arch.resize_hpt == resize) {
/* We may request large allocations here:
- * do not sleep with kvm->lock held for a while.
+ * do not sleep with kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock held for a while.
*/
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
resize_hpt_debug(resize, "resize_hpt_prepare_work(): order = %d\n",
resize->order);
@@ -1494,9 +1494,9 @@ static void resize_hpt_prepare_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (WARN_ON(err == -EBUSY))
err = -EINPROGRESS;
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
/* It is possible that kvm->arch.resize_hpt != resize
- * after we grab kvm->lock again.
+ * after we grab kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock again.
*/
}
@@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ static void resize_hpt_prepare_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (kvm->arch.resize_hpt != resize)
resize_hpt_release(kvm, resize);
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
}
long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_prepare(struct kvm *kvm,
@@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_prepare(struct kvm *kvm,
if (shift && ((shift < 18) || (shift > 46)))
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
resize = kvm->arch.resize_hpt;
@@ -1565,7 +1565,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_prepare(struct kvm *kvm,
ret = 100; /* estimated time in ms */
out:
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_commit(struct kvm *kvm,
if (shift && ((shift < 18) || (shift > 46)))
return -EINVAL;
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
resize = kvm->arch.resize_hpt;
@@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ out:
smp_mb();
out_no_hpt:
resize_hpt_release(kvm, resize);
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
return ret;
}
@@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
return -EINVAL;
/* lock out vcpus from running while we're doing this */
- mutex_lock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
mmu_ready = kvm->arch.mmu_ready;
if (mmu_ready) {
kvm->arch.mmu_ready = 0; /* temporarily */
@@ -1876,7 +1876,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
smp_mb();
if (atomic_read(&kvm->arch.vcpus_running)) {
kvm->arch.mmu_ready = 1;
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
return -EBUSY;
}
}
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
/* Order HPTE updates vs. mmu_ready */
smp_wmb();
kvm->arch.mmu_ready = mmu_ready;
- mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock);
+ mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock);
if (err)
return err;