diff options
author | Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> | 2019-05-23 16:35:34 +1000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org> | 2019-05-29 13:44:36 +1000 |
commit | 0d4ee88d92884c661fcafd5576da243aa943dc24 (patch) | |
tree | aceeeea58f0da9a1f928d1b52e83ebba5d90674b /arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | |
parent | c395fe1d8e49a5aa03504fcacfb7c95b5a4c6e04 (diff) | |
download | linux-0d4ee88d92884c661fcafd5576da243aa943dc24.tar.bz2 |
KVM: PPC: Book3S HV: Use new mutex to synchronize MMU setup
Currently the HV KVM code uses kvm->lock in conjunction with a flag,
kvm->arch.mmu_ready, to synchronize MMU setup and hold off vcpu
execution until the MMU-related data structures are ready. However,
this means that kvm->lock is being taken inside vcpu->mutex, which
is contrary to Documentation/virtual/kvm/locking.txt and results in
lockdep warnings.
To fix this, we add a new mutex, kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock, which nests
inside the vcpu mutexes, and is taken in the places where kvm->lock
was taken that are related to MMU setup.
Additionally we take the new mutex in the vcpu creation code at the
point where we are creating a new vcore, in order to provide mutual
exclusion with kvmppc_update_lpcr() and ensure that an update to
kvm->arch.lpcr doesn't get missed, which could otherwise lead to a
stale vcore->lpcr value.
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@ozlabs.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c | 36 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 18 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c index ab3d484c5e2e..51971311e6c9 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu_hv.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct kvm_resize_hpt { struct work_struct work; u32 order; - /* These fields protected by kvm->lock */ + /* These fields protected by kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock */ /* Possible values and their usage: * <0 an error occurred during allocation, @@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ struct kvm_resize_hpt { int error; /* Private to the work thread, until error != -EBUSY, - * then protected by kvm->lock. + * then protected by kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock. */ struct kvm_hpt_info hpt; }; @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ long kvmppc_alloc_reset_hpt(struct kvm *kvm, int order) long err = -EBUSY; struct kvm_hpt_info info; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); if (kvm->arch.mmu_ready) { kvm->arch.mmu_ready = 0; /* order mmu_ready vs. vcpus_running */ @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ out: /* Ensure that each vcpu will flush its TLB on next entry. */ cpumask_setall(&kvm->arch.need_tlb_flush); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); return err; } @@ -1447,7 +1447,7 @@ static void resize_hpt_pivot(struct kvm_resize_hpt *resize) static void resize_hpt_release(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_resize_hpt *resize) { - if (WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&kvm->lock))) + if (WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock))) return; if (!resize) @@ -1474,14 +1474,14 @@ static void resize_hpt_prepare_work(struct work_struct *work) if (WARN_ON(resize->error != -EBUSY)) return; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); /* Request is still current? */ if (kvm->arch.resize_hpt == resize) { /* We may request large allocations here: - * do not sleep with kvm->lock held for a while. + * do not sleep with kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock held for a while. */ - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); resize_hpt_debug(resize, "resize_hpt_prepare_work(): order = %d\n", resize->order); @@ -1494,9 +1494,9 @@ static void resize_hpt_prepare_work(struct work_struct *work) if (WARN_ON(err == -EBUSY)) err = -EINPROGRESS; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); /* It is possible that kvm->arch.resize_hpt != resize - * after we grab kvm->lock again. + * after we grab kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock again. */ } @@ -1505,7 +1505,7 @@ static void resize_hpt_prepare_work(struct work_struct *work) if (kvm->arch.resize_hpt != resize) resize_hpt_release(kvm, resize); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); } long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_prepare(struct kvm *kvm, @@ -1522,7 +1522,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_prepare(struct kvm *kvm, if (shift && ((shift < 18) || (shift > 46))) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); resize = kvm->arch.resize_hpt; @@ -1565,7 +1565,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_prepare(struct kvm *kvm, ret = 100; /* estimated time in ms */ out: - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); return ret; } @@ -1588,7 +1588,7 @@ long kvm_vm_ioctl_resize_hpt_commit(struct kvm *kvm, if (shift && ((shift < 18) || (shift > 46))) return -EINVAL; - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); resize = kvm->arch.resize_hpt; @@ -1625,7 +1625,7 @@ out: smp_mb(); out_no_hpt: resize_hpt_release(kvm, resize); - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); return ret; } @@ -1868,7 +1868,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, return -EINVAL; /* lock out vcpus from running while we're doing this */ - mutex_lock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); mmu_ready = kvm->arch.mmu_ready; if (mmu_ready) { kvm->arch.mmu_ready = 0; /* temporarily */ @@ -1876,7 +1876,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, smp_mb(); if (atomic_read(&kvm->arch.vcpus_running)) { kvm->arch.mmu_ready = 1; - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); return -EBUSY; } } @@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ static ssize_t kvm_htab_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, /* Order HPTE updates vs. mmu_ready */ smp_wmb(); kvm->arch.mmu_ready = mmu_ready; - mutex_unlock(&kvm->lock); + mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.mmu_setup_lock); if (err) return err; |