diff options
| author | Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> | 2020-01-13 10:07:35 -0500 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2020-01-17 10:19:30 +0100 |
| commit | f5bfdc8e3947a7ae489cf8ae9cfd6b3fb357b952 (patch) | |
| tree | e3203e215a968b8f0681ec15d9952c4c05583005 /arch/arm64 | |
| parent | 57097124cbbd310cc2b5884189e22e60a3c20514 (diff) | |
| download | linux-f5bfdc8e3947a7ae489cf8ae9cfd6b3fb357b952.tar.bz2 | |
locking/osq: Use optimized spinning loop for arm64
Arm64 has a more optimized spinning loop (atomic_cond_read_acquire)
using wfe for spinlock that can boost performance of sibling threads
by putting the current cpu to a wait state that is broken only when
the monitored variable changes or an external event happens.
OSQ has a more complicated spinning loop. Besides the lock value, it
also checks for need_resched() and vcpu_is_preempted(). The check for
need_resched() is not a problem as it is only set by the tick interrupt
handler. That will be detected by the spinning cpu right after iret.
The vcpu_is_preempted() check, however, is a problem as changes to the
preempt state of of previous node will not affect the wait state. For
ARM64, vcpu_is_preempted is not currently defined and so is a no-op.
Will has indicated that he is planning to para-virtualize wfe instead
of defining vcpu_is_preempted for PV support. So just add a comment in
arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h to indicate that vcpu_is_preempted()
should not be defined as suggested.
On a 2-socket 56-core 224-thread ARM64 system, a kernel mutex locking
microbenchmark was run for 10s with and without the patch. The
performance numbers before patch were:
Running locktest with mutex [runtime = 10s, load = 1]
Threads = 224, Min/Mean/Max = 316/123,143/2,121,269
Threads = 224, Total Rate = 2,757 kop/s; Percpu Rate = 12 kop/s
After patch, the numbers were:
Running locktest with mutex [runtime = 10s, load = 1]
Threads = 224, Min/Mean/Max = 334/147,836/1,304,787
Threads = 224, Total Rate = 3,311 kop/s; Percpu Rate = 15 kop/s
So there was about 20% performance improvement.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200113150735.21956-1-longman@redhat.com
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h | 9 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h index b093b287babf..102404dc1e13 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/spinlock.h @@ -11,4 +11,13 @@ /* See include/linux/spinlock.h */ #define smp_mb__after_spinlock() smp_mb() +/* + * Changing this will break osq_lock() thanks to the call inside + * smp_cond_load_relaxed(). + * + * See: + * https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200110100612.GC2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net + */ +#define vcpu_is_preempted(cpu) false + #endif /* __ASM_SPINLOCK_H */ |