signal/arm: Document conflicts with SI_USER and SIGFPE

Setting si_code to 0 results in a userspace seeing an si_code of 0.
This is the same si_code as SI_USER.  Posix and common sense requires
that SI_USER not be a signal specific si_code.  As such this use of 0
for the si_code is a pretty horribly broken ABI.

Further use of si_code == 0 guaranteed that copy_siginfo_to_user saw a
value of __SI_KILL and now sees a value of SIL_KILL with the result
that uid and pid fields are copied and which might copying the si_addr
field by accident but certainly not by design.  Making this a very
flakey implementation.

Utilizing FPE_FIXME, siginfo_layout will now return SIL_FAULT and the
appropriate fields will be reliably copied.

Possible ABI fixes includee:
- Send the signal without siginfo
- Don't generate a signal
- Possibly assign and use an appropriate si_code
- Don't handle cases which can't happen

Cc: Russell King <rmk@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Ref: 451436b7bbb2 ("[ARM] Add support code for ARM hardware vector floating point")
History Tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/history.git
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index a71a48e71fff..03c6a3c72f9c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
 
 	if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
 		vfp_panic("unhandled bounce", inst);
-		vfp_raise_sigfpe(0, regs);
+		vfp_raise_sigfpe(FPE_FIXME, regs);
 		return;
 	}