diff options
| author | Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com> | 2012-07-20 12:01:23 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> | 2013-05-30 16:02:18 +0100 |
| commit | 82f667046ec895552caf2f7a4c6841c530bfc215 (patch) | |
| tree | a9ebf45fc7606fd6c8b8c7d5bce643a6527de454 /arch/arm/mm | |
| parent | 4756dcbfd37819a8359d3c69a22be2ee41666d0f (diff) | |
| download | linux-82f667046ec895552caf2f7a4c6841c530bfc215.tar.bz2 | |
ARM: mm: use physical addresses in highmem sanity checks
This patch modifies the highmem sanity checking code to use physical addresses
instead. This change eliminates the wrap-around problems associated with the
original virtual address based checks, and this simplifies the code a bit.
The one constraint imposed here is that low physical memory must be mapped in
a monotonically increasing fashion if there are multiple banks of memory,
i.e., x < y must => pa(x) < pa(y).
Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@ti.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Tested-by: Subash Patel <subash.rp@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mm')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c index b7ce65a82371..fc6ff1a9db50 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c @@ -988,6 +988,7 @@ phys_addr_t arm_lowmem_limit __initdata = 0; void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) { int i, j, highmem = 0; + phys_addr_t vmalloc_limit = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1; for (i = 0, j = 0; i < meminfo.nr_banks; i++) { struct membank *bank = &meminfo.bank[j]; @@ -997,8 +998,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) highmem = 1; #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM - if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) + if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) highmem = 1; bank->highmem = highmem; @@ -1007,8 +1007,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Split those memory banks which are partially overlapping * the vmalloc area greatly simplifying things later. */ - if (!highmem && __va(bank->start) < vmalloc_min && - bank->size > vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start)) { + if (!highmem && bank->start < vmalloc_limit && + bank->size > vmalloc_limit - bank->start) { if (meminfo.nr_banks >= NR_BANKS) { printk(KERN_CRIT "NR_BANKS too low, " "ignoring high memory\n"); @@ -1017,12 +1017,12 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) (meminfo.nr_banks - i) * sizeof(*bank)); meminfo.nr_banks++; i++; - bank[1].size -= vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); - bank[1].start = __pa(vmalloc_min - 1) + 1; + bank[1].size -= vmalloc_limit - bank->start; + bank[1].start = vmalloc_limit; bank[1].highmem = highmem = 1; j++; } - bank->size = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); + bank->size = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; } #else bank->highmem = highmem; @@ -1042,8 +1042,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Check whether this memory bank would entirely overlap * the vmalloc area. */ - if (__va(bank->start) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start) < (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) { + if (bank->start >= vmalloc_limit) { printk(KERN_NOTICE "Ignoring RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx " "(vmalloc region overlap).\n", (unsigned long long)bank->start, @@ -1055,9 +1054,8 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void) * Check whether this memory bank would partially overlap * the vmalloc area. */ - if (__va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) >= vmalloc_min || - __va(bank->start + bank->size - 1) <= __va(bank->start)) { - unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_min - __va(bank->start); + if (bank->start + bank->size > vmalloc_limit) + unsigned long newsize = vmalloc_limit - bank->start; printk(KERN_NOTICE "Truncating RAM at %.8llx-%.8llx " "to -%.8llx (vmalloc region overlap).\n", (unsigned long long)bank->start, |