summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>2015-03-11 15:44:52 +0000
committerJason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>2015-03-18 17:36:32 +0000
commit8b283c025443e4c3a3323c92777f422fa504caa5 (patch)
tree20ee5fdd7d45838e7a6527a897a581b42474668f /arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
parentc517d838eb7d07bbe9507871fab3931deccff539 (diff)
downloadlinux-8b283c025443e4c3a3323c92777f422fa504caa5.tar.bz2
ARM: exynos4/5: convert pmu wakeup to stacked domains
Exynos has been (ab)using the gic_arch_extn to provide wakeup from suspend, and it makes a lot of sense to convert this code to use stacked domains instead. This patch does just this, updating the DT files to actually reflect what the HW provides. BIG FAT WARNING: because the DTs were so far lying by not exposing the fact that the PMU block is actually the first interrupt controller in the chain for RTC, kernels with this patch applied wont have any suspend-resume facility when booted with old DTs, and old kernels with updated DTs may not even boot. Also, I strongly suspect that there is more than two wake-up interrupts on these platforms, but I leave it to the maintainers to fix their mess. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1426088693-15724-2-git-send-email-marc.zyngier@arm.com [ jac: squash in maz's fixup from https://lkml.kernel.org/r/5506989D.9050703@arm.com ] Signed-off-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c15
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 10 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
index 9e9dfdfad9d7..f44c2e05c82e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
@@ -166,16 +166,14 @@ static void __init exynos_init_io(void)
exynos_map_io();
}
+/*
+ * Apparently, these SoCs are not able to wake-up from suspend using
+ * the PMU. Too bad. Should they suddenly become capable of such a
+ * feat, the matches below should be moved to suspend.c.
+ */
static const struct of_device_id exynos_dt_pmu_match[] = {
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos3250-pmu" },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pmu" },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4212-pmu" },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4412-pmu" },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos4415-pmu" },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pmu" },
{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-pmu" },
{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5410-pmu" },
- { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pmu" },
{ /*sentinel*/ },
};
@@ -186,9 +184,6 @@ static void exynos_map_pmu(void)
np = of_find_matching_node(NULL, exynos_dt_pmu_match);
if (np)
pmu_base_addr = of_iomap(np, 0);
-
- if (!pmu_base_addr)
- panic("failed to find exynos pmu register\n");
}
static void __init exynos_init_irq(void)