diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-10-21 11:21:19 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2014-10-21 11:21:19 -0700 |
commit | 43d451f163c1b615c1bedef95258c49712679eeb (patch) | |
tree | 52ed78b04435ffbd663a902bbd5bdb69a65ad584 /Documentation | |
parent | 21d2271fd0812ebe3716cab0b48356837485a74d (diff) | |
parent | 9f3e3cacb2ffdefe28c7cf490bf543e4dcb2770a (diff) | |
download | linux-43d451f163c1b615c1bedef95258c49712679eeb.tar.bz2 |
Merge branch 'mailbox-for-linus' of git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration
Pull mailbox framework from Jassi Brar:
"A framework for Mailbox controllers and clients have been cooking for
more than a year now.
Everybody in the CC list had been copied on patchset revisions and
most of them have made sounds of approval, though just one concrete
Reviewed-by. The patchset has also been in linux-next for a couple of
weeks now and no conflict has been reported. The framework has the
backing of at least 5 platforms, though I can't say if/when they
upstream their drivers (some businesses have 'changed')"
(Further acked-by by Arnd Bergmann and Suman Anna in the pull request
thread)
* 'mailbox-for-linus' of git://git.linaro.org/landing-teams/working/fujitsu/integration:
dt: mailbox: add generic bindings
doc: add documentation for mailbox framework
mailbox: Introduce framework for mailbox
mailbox: rename pl320-ipc specific mailbox.h
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt | 38 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/mailbox.txt | 122 |
2 files changed, 160 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..1a2cd3d266db --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +* Generic Mailbox Controller and client driver bindings + +Generic binding to provide a way for Mailbox controller drivers to +assign appropriate mailbox channel to client drivers. + +* Mailbox Controller + +Required property: +- #mbox-cells: Must be at least 1. Number of cells in a mailbox + specifier. + +Example: + mailbox: mailbox { + ... + #mbox-cells = <1>; + }; + + +* Mailbox Client + +Required property: +- mboxes: List of phandle and mailbox channel specifiers. + +Optional property: +- mbox-names: List of identifier strings for each mailbox channel + required by the client. The use of this property + is discouraged in favor of using index in list of + 'mboxes' while requesting a mailbox. Instead the + platforms may define channel indices, in DT headers, + to something legible. + +Example: + pwr_cntrl: power { + ... + mbox-names = "pwr-ctrl", "rpc"; + mboxes = <&mailbox 0 + &mailbox 1>; + }; diff --git a/Documentation/mailbox.txt b/Documentation/mailbox.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..60f43ff629aa --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/mailbox.txt @@ -0,0 +1,122 @@ + The Common Mailbox Framework + Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org> + + This document aims to help developers write client and controller +drivers for the API. But before we start, let us note that the +client (especially) and controller drivers are likely going to be +very platform specific because the remote firmware is likely to be +proprietary and implement non-standard protocol. So even if two +platforms employ, say, PL320 controller, the client drivers can't +be shared across them. Even the PL320 driver might need to accommodate +some platform specific quirks. So the API is meant mainly to avoid +similar copies of code written for each platform. Having said that, +nothing prevents the remote f/w to also be Linux based and use the +same api there. However none of that helps us locally because we only +ever deal at client's protocol level. + Some of the choices made during implementation are the result of this +peculiarity of this "common" framework. + + + + Part 1 - Controller Driver (See include/linux/mailbox_controller.h) + + Allocate mbox_controller and the array of mbox_chan. +Populate mbox_chan_ops, except peek_data() all are mandatory. +The controller driver might know a message has been consumed +by the remote by getting an IRQ or polling some hardware flag +or it can never know (the client knows by way of the protocol). +The method in order of preference is IRQ -> Poll -> None, which +the controller driver should set via 'txdone_irq' or 'txdone_poll' +or neither. + + + Part 2 - Client Driver (See include/linux/mailbox_client.h) + + The client might want to operate in blocking mode (synchronously +send a message through before returning) or non-blocking/async mode (submit +a message and a callback function to the API and return immediately). + + +struct demo_client { + struct mbox_client cl; + struct mbox_chan *mbox; + struct completion c; + bool async; + /* ... */ +}; + +/* + * This is the handler for data received from remote. The behaviour is purely + * dependent upon the protocol. This is just an example. + */ +static void message_from_remote(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg) +{ + struct demo_client *dc = container_of(mbox_client, + struct demo_client, cl); + if (dc->aysnc) { + if (is_an_ack(mssg)) { + /* An ACK to our last sample sent */ + return; /* Or do something else here */ + } else { /* A new message from remote */ + queue_req(mssg); + } + } else { + /* Remote f/w sends only ACK packets on this channel */ + return; + } +} + +static void sample_sent(struct mbox_client *cl, void *mssg, int r) +{ + struct demo_client *dc = container_of(mbox_client, + struct demo_client, cl); + complete(&dc->c); +} + +static void client_demo(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct demo_client *dc_sync, *dc_async; + /* The controller already knows async_pkt and sync_pkt */ + struct async_pkt ap; + struct sync_pkt sp; + + dc_sync = kzalloc(sizeof(*dc_sync), GFP_KERNEL); + dc_async = kzalloc(sizeof(*dc_async), GFP_KERNEL); + + /* Populate non-blocking mode client */ + dc_async->cl.dev = &pdev->dev; + dc_async->cl.rx_callback = message_from_remote; + dc_async->cl.tx_done = sample_sent; + dc_async->cl.tx_block = false; + dc_async->cl.tx_tout = 0; /* doesn't matter here */ + dc_async->cl.knows_txdone = false; /* depending upon protocol */ + dc_async->async = true; + init_completion(&dc_async->c); + + /* Populate blocking mode client */ + dc_sync->cl.dev = &pdev->dev; + dc_sync->cl.rx_callback = message_from_remote; + dc_sync->cl.tx_done = NULL; /* operate in blocking mode */ + dc_sync->cl.tx_block = true; + dc_sync->cl.tx_tout = 500; /* by half a second */ + dc_sync->cl.knows_txdone = false; /* depending upon protocol */ + dc_sync->async = false; + + /* ASync mailbox is listed second in 'mboxes' property */ + dc_async->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&dc_async->cl, 1); + /* Populate data packet */ + /* ap.xxx = 123; etc */ + /* Send async message to remote */ + mbox_send_message(dc_async->mbox, &ap); + + /* Sync mailbox is listed first in 'mboxes' property */ + dc_sync->mbox = mbox_request_channel(&dc_sync->cl, 0); + /* Populate data packet */ + /* sp.abc = 123; etc */ + /* Send message to remote in blocking mode */ + mbox_send_message(dc_sync->mbox, &sp); + /* At this point 'sp' has been sent */ + + /* Now wait for async chan to be done */ + wait_for_completion(&dc_async->c); +} |