summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/workqueue.txt
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2011-05-10 17:05:24 +0200
committerIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>2011-05-10 17:05:45 +0200
commit932fed4e2e42c3d730c01bb63b1c4f812c533d5b (patch)
tree11b1afac3a40d253cdb905c42901edfaae5e196e /Documentation/workqueue.txt
parent57d524154ffe99d27fb55e0e30ddbad9f4c35806 (diff)
parent693d92a1bbc9e42681c42ed190bd42b636ca876f (diff)
downloadlinux-932fed4e2e42c3d730c01bb63b1c4f812c533d5b.tar.bz2
Merge commit 'v2.6.39-rc7' into perf/core
Merge reason: pull in the latest fixes. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/workqueue.txt')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/workqueue.txt40
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/workqueue.txt b/Documentation/workqueue.txt
index 01c513fac40e..a0b577de918f 100644
--- a/Documentation/workqueue.txt
+++ b/Documentation/workqueue.txt
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ CONTENTS
4. Application Programming Interface (API)
5. Example Execution Scenarios
6. Guidelines
+7. Debugging
1. Introduction
@@ -379,3 +380,42 @@ If q1 has WQ_CPU_INTENSIVE set,
* Unless work items are expected to consume a huge amount of CPU
cycles, using a bound wq is usually beneficial due to the increased
level of locality in wq operations and work item execution.
+
+
+7. Debugging
+
+Because the work functions are executed by generic worker threads
+there are a few tricks needed to shed some light on misbehaving
+workqueue users.
+
+Worker threads show up in the process list as:
+
+root 5671 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/0:1]
+root 5672 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:07 0:00 [kworker/1:2]
+root 5673 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:12 0:00 [kworker/0:0]
+root 5674 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 12:13 0:00 [kworker/1:0]
+
+If kworkers are going crazy (using too much cpu), there are two types
+of possible problems:
+
+ 1. Something beeing scheduled in rapid succession
+ 2. A single work item that consumes lots of cpu cycles
+
+The first one can be tracked using tracing:
+
+ $ echo workqueue:workqueue_queue_work > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/set_event
+ $ cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/trace_pipe > out.txt
+ (wait a few secs)
+ ^C
+
+If something is busy looping on work queueing, it would be dominating
+the output and the offender can be determined with the work item
+function.
+
+For the second type of problems it should be possible to just check
+the stack trace of the offending worker thread.
+
+ $ cat /proc/THE_OFFENDING_KWORKER/stack
+
+The work item's function should be trivially visible in the stack
+trace.