diff options
| author | Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> | 2018-03-07 13:46:24 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> | 2018-03-09 10:42:06 -0700 |
| commit | 7f5d465f4ddc242709a01030313e80a8d94ccaaa (patch) | |
| tree | 5efa47b34edd1eaf6cd97f18722d6436e46cfe17 /Documentation/admin-guide | |
| parent | 6234c7bd8c14508fb76c0a4d6f01eb81c8ce9cbf (diff) | |
| download | linux-7f5d465f4ddc242709a01030313e80a8d94ccaaa.tar.bz2 | |
docs: clarify security-bugs disclosure policy
I think we need to soften the language a bit. It might scare folks
off, especially the:
We prefer to fully disclose the bug as soon as possible.
which is not really the case. Linus says:
It's not full disclosure, it's not coordinated disclosure,
and it's not "no disclosure". It's more like just "timely
open fixes".
I changed a bit of the wording in here, but mostly to remove the word
"disclosure" since it seems to mean very specific things to people
that we do not mean here.
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/admin-guide')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst | 24 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst index 47574b382d75..30491d91e93d 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/security-bugs.rst @@ -29,18 +29,20 @@ made public. Disclosure ---------- -The goal of the Linux kernel security team is to work with the -bug submitter to bug resolution as well as disclosure. We prefer -to fully disclose the bug as soon as possible. It is reasonable to -delay disclosure when the bug or the fix is not yet fully understood, -the solution is not well-tested or for vendor coordination. However, we -expect these delays to be short, measurable in days, not weeks or months. -A disclosure date is negotiated by the security team working with the -bug submitter as well as vendors. However, the kernel security team -holds the final say when setting a disclosure date. The timeframe for -disclosure is from immediate (esp. if it's already publicly known) +The goal of the Linux kernel security team is to work with the bug +submitter to understand and fix the bug. We prefer to publish the fix as +soon as possible, but try to avoid public discussion of the bug itself +and leave that to others. + +Publishing the fix may be delayed when the bug or the fix is not yet +fully understood, the solution is not well-tested or for vendor +coordination. However, we expect these delays to be short, measurable in +days, not weeks or months. A release date is negotiated by the security +team working with the bug submitter as well as vendors. However, the +kernel security team holds the final say when setting a timeframe. The +timeframe varies from immediate (esp. if it's already publicly known bug) to a few weeks. As a basic default policy, we expect report date to -disclosure date to be on the order of 7 days. +release date to be on the order of 7 days. Coordination ------------ |