docs: admin-guide: add cgroup-v2 documentation

The cgroup-v2.txt is already in ReST format. So, move it to the
admin-guide, where it belongs.

Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

1 files changed, 1998 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..74cdeaed9f7a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,1998 @@
+================
+Control Group v2
+================
+
+:Date: October, 2015
+:Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
+
+This is the authoritative documentation on the design, interface and
+conventions of cgroup v2.  It describes all userland-visible aspects
+of cgroup including core and specific controller behaviors.  All
+future changes must be reflected in this document.  Documentation for
+v1 is available under Documentation/cgroup-v1/.
+
+.. CONTENTS
+
+   1. Introduction
+     1-1. Terminology
+     1-2. What is cgroup?
+   2. Basic Operations
+     2-1. Mounting
+     2-2. Organizing Processes and Threads
+       2-2-1. Processes
+       2-2-2. Threads
+     2-3. [Un]populated Notification
+     2-4. Controlling Controllers
+       2-4-1. Enabling and Disabling
+       2-4-2. Top-down Constraint
+       2-4-3. No Internal Process Constraint
+     2-5. Delegation
+       2-5-1. Model of Delegation
+       2-5-2. Delegation Containment
+     2-6. Guidelines
+       2-6-1. Organize Once and Control
+       2-6-2. Avoid Name Collisions
+   3. Resource Distribution Models
+     3-1. Weights
+     3-2. Limits
+     3-3. Protections
+     3-4. Allocations
+   4. Interface Files
+     4-1. Format
+     4-2. Conventions
+     4-3. Core Interface Files
+   5. Controllers
+     5-1. CPU
+       5-1-1. CPU Interface Files
+     5-2. Memory
+       5-2-1. Memory Interface Files
+       5-2-2. Usage Guidelines
+       5-2-3. Memory Ownership
+     5-3. IO
+       5-3-1. IO Interface Files
+       5-3-2. Writeback
+     5-4. PID
+       5-4-1. PID Interface Files
+     5-5. Device
+     5-6. RDMA
+       5-6-1. RDMA Interface Files
+     5-7. Misc
+       5-7-1. perf_event
+     5-N. Non-normative information
+       5-N-1. CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
+       5-N-2. IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
+   6. Namespace
+     6-1. Basics
+     6-2. The Root and Views
+     6-3. Migration and setns(2)
+     6-4. Interaction with Other Namespaces
+   P. Information on Kernel Programming
+     P-1. Filesystem Support for Writeback
+   D. Deprecated v1 Core Features
+   R. Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
+     R-1. Multiple Hierarchies
+     R-2. Thread Granularity
+     R-3. Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
+     R-4. Other Interface Issues
+     R-5. Controller Issues and Remedies
+       R-5-1. Memory
+
+
+Introduction
+============
+
+Terminology
+-----------
+
+"cgroup" stands for "control group" and is never capitalized.  The
+singular form is used to designate the whole feature and also as a
+qualifier as in "cgroup controllers".  When explicitly referring to
+multiple individual control groups, the plural form "cgroups" is used.
+
+
+What is cgroup?
+---------------
+
+cgroup is a mechanism to organize processes hierarchically and
+distribute system resources along the hierarchy in a controlled and
+configurable manner.
+
+cgroup is largely composed of two parts - the core and controllers.
+cgroup core is primarily responsible for hierarchically organizing
+processes.  A cgroup controller is usually responsible for
+distributing a specific type of system resource along the hierarchy
+although there are utility controllers which serve purposes other than
+resource distribution.
+
+cgroups form a tree structure and every process in the system belongs
+to one and only one cgroup.  All threads of a process belong to the
+same cgroup.  On creation, all processes are put in the cgroup that
+the parent process belongs to at the time.  A process can be migrated
+to another cgroup.  Migration of a process doesn't affect already
+existing descendant processes.
+
+Following certain structural constraints, controllers may be enabled or
+disabled selectively on a cgroup.  All controller behaviors are
+hierarchical - if a controller is enabled on a cgroup, it affects all
+processes which belong to the cgroups consisting the inclusive
+sub-hierarchy of the cgroup.  When a controller is enabled on a nested
+cgroup, it always restricts the resource distribution further.  The
+restrictions set closer to the root in the hierarchy can not be
+overridden from further away.
+
+
+Basic Operations
+================
+
+Mounting
+--------
+
+Unlike v1, cgroup v2 has only single hierarchy.  The cgroup v2
+hierarchy can be mounted with the following mount command::
+
+  # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
+
+cgroup2 filesystem has the magic number 0x63677270 ("cgrp").  All
+controllers which support v2 and are not bound to a v1 hierarchy are
+automatically bound to the v2 hierarchy and show up at the root.
+Controllers which are not in active use in the v2 hierarchy can be
+bound to other hierarchies.  This allows mixing v2 hierarchy with the
+legacy v1 multiple hierarchies in a fully backward compatible way.
+
+A controller can be moved across hierarchies only after the controller
+is no longer referenced in its current hierarchy.  Because per-cgroup
+controller states are destroyed asynchronously and controllers may
+have lingering references, a controller may not show up immediately on
+the v2 hierarchy after the final umount of the previous hierarchy.
+Similarly, a controller should be fully disabled to be moved out of
+the unified hierarchy and it may take some time for the disabled
+controller to become available for other hierarchies; furthermore, due
+to inter-controller dependencies, other controllers may need to be
+disabled too.
+
+While useful for development and manual configurations, moving
+controllers dynamically between the v2 and other hierarchies is
+strongly discouraged for production use.  It is recommended to decide
+the hierarchies and controller associations before starting using the
+controllers after system boot.
+
+During transition to v2, system management software might still
+automount the v1 cgroup filesystem and so hijack all controllers
+during boot, before manual intervention is possible. To make testing
+and experimenting easier, the kernel parameter cgroup_no_v1= allows
+disabling controllers in v1 and make them always available in v2.
+
+cgroup v2 currently supports the following mount options.
+
+  nsdelegate
+
+	Consider cgroup namespaces as delegation boundaries.  This
+	option is system wide and can only be set on mount or modified
+	through remount from the init namespace.  The mount option is
+	ignored on non-init namespace mounts.  Please refer to the
+	Delegation section for details.
+
+
+Organizing Processes and Threads
+--------------------------------
+
+Processes
+~~~~~~~~~
+
+Initially, only the root cgroup exists to which all processes belong.
+A child cgroup can be created by creating a sub-directory::
+
+  # mkdir $CGROUP_NAME
+
+A given cgroup may have multiple child cgroups forming a tree
+structure.  Each cgroup has a read-writable interface file
+"cgroup.procs".  When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which
+belong to the cgroup one-per-line.  The PIDs are not ordered and the
+same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved to
+another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while reading.
+
+A process can be migrated into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
+target cgroup's "cgroup.procs" file.  Only one process can be migrated
+on a single write(2) call.  If a process is composed of multiple
+threads, writing the PID of any thread migrates all threads of the
+process.
+
+When a process forks a child process, the new process is born into the
+cgroup that the forking process belongs to at the time of the
+operation.  After exit, a process stays associated with the cgroup
+that it belonged to at the time of exit until it's reaped; however, a
+zombie process does not appear in "cgroup.procs" and thus can't be
+moved to another cgroup.
+
+A cgroup which doesn't have any children or live processes can be
+destroyed by removing the directory.  Note that a cgroup which doesn't
+have any children and is associated only with zombie processes is
+considered empty and can be removed::
+
+  # rmdir $CGROUP_NAME
+
+"/proc/$PID/cgroup" lists a process's cgroup membership.  If legacy
+cgroup is in use in the system, this file may contain multiple lines,
+one for each hierarchy.  The entry for cgroup v2 is always in the
+format "0::$PATH"::
+
+  # cat /proc/842/cgroup
+  ...
+  0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested
+
+If the process becomes a zombie and the cgroup it was associated with
+is removed subsequently, " (deleted)" is appended to the path::
+
+  # cat /proc/842/cgroup
+  ...
+  0::/test-cgroup/test-cgroup-nested (deleted)
+
+
+Threads
+~~~~~~~
+
+cgroup v2 supports thread granularity for a subset of controllers to
+support use cases requiring hierarchical resource distribution across
+the threads of a group of processes.  By default, all threads of a
+process belong to the same cgroup, which also serves as the resource
+domain to host resource consumptions which are not specific to a
+process or thread.  The thread mode allows threads to be spread across
+a subtree while still maintaining the common resource domain for them.
+
+Controllers which support thread mode are called threaded controllers.
+The ones which don't are called domain controllers.
+
+Marking a cgroup threaded makes it join the resource domain of its
+parent as a threaded cgroup.  The parent may be another threaded
+cgroup whose resource domain is further up in the hierarchy.  The root
+of a threaded subtree, that is, the nearest ancestor which is not
+threaded, is called threaded domain or thread root interchangeably and
+serves as the resource domain for the entire subtree.
+
+Inside a threaded subtree, threads of a process can be put in
+different cgroups and are not subject to the no internal process
+constraint - threaded controllers can be enabled on non-leaf cgroups
+whether they have threads in them or not.
+
+As the threaded domain cgroup hosts all the domain resource
+consumptions of the subtree, it is considered to have internal
+resource consumptions whether there are processes in it or not and
+can't have populated child cgroups which aren't threaded.  Because the
+root cgroup is not subject to no internal process constraint, it can
+serve both as a threaded domain and a parent to domain cgroups.
+
+The current operation mode or type of the cgroup is shown in the
+"cgroup.type" file which indicates whether the cgroup is a normal
+domain, a domain which is serving as the domain of a threaded subtree,
+or a threaded cgroup.
+
+On creation, a cgroup is always a domain cgroup and can be made
+threaded by writing "threaded" to the "cgroup.type" file.  The
+operation is single direction::
+
+  # echo threaded > cgroup.type
+
+Once threaded, the cgroup can't be made a domain again.  To enable the
+thread mode, the following conditions must be met.
+
+- As the cgroup will join the parent's resource domain.  The parent
+  must either be a valid (threaded) domain or a threaded cgroup.
+
+- When the parent is an unthreaded domain, it must not have any domain
+  controllers enabled or populated domain children.  The root is
+  exempt from this requirement.
+
+Topology-wise, a cgroup can be in an invalid state.  Please consider
+the following topology::
+
+  A (threaded domain) - B (threaded) - C (domain, just created)
+
+C is created as a domain but isn't connected to a parent which can
+host child domains.  C can't be used until it is turned into a
+threaded cgroup.  "cgroup.type" file will report "domain (invalid)" in
+these cases.  Operations which fail due to invalid topology use
+EOPNOTSUPP as the errno.
+
+A domain cgroup is turned into a threaded domain when one of its child
+cgroup becomes threaded or threaded controllers are enabled in the
+"cgroup.subtree_control" file while there are processes in the cgroup.
+A threaded domain reverts to a normal domain when the conditions
+clear.
+
+When read, "cgroup.threads" contains the list of the thread IDs of all
+threads in the cgroup.  Except that the operations are per-thread
+instead of per-process, "cgroup.threads" has the same format and
+behaves the same way as "cgroup.procs".  While "cgroup.threads" can be
+written to in any cgroup, as it can only move threads inside the same
+threaded domain, its operations are confined inside each threaded
+subtree.
+
+The threaded domain cgroup serves as the resource domain for the whole
+subtree, and, while the threads can be scattered across the subtree,
+all the processes are considered to be in the threaded domain cgroup.
+"cgroup.procs" in a threaded domain cgroup contains the PIDs of all
+processes in the subtree and is not readable in the subtree proper.
+However, "cgroup.procs" can be written to from anywhere in the subtree
+to migrate all threads of the matching process to the cgroup.
+
+Only threaded controllers can be enabled in a threaded subtree.  When
+a threaded controller is enabled inside a threaded subtree, it only
+accounts for and controls resource consumptions associated with the
+threads in the cgroup and its descendants.  All consumptions which
+aren't tied to a specific thread belong to the threaded domain cgroup.
+
+Because a threaded subtree is exempt from no internal process
+constraint, a threaded controller must be able to handle competition
+between threads in a non-leaf cgroup and its child cgroups.  Each
+threaded controller defines how such competitions are handled.
+
+
+[Un]populated Notification
+--------------------------
+
+Each non-root cgroup has a "cgroup.events" file which contains
+"populated" field indicating whether the cgroup's sub-hierarchy has
+live processes in it.  Its value is 0 if there is no live process in
+the cgroup and its descendants; otherwise, 1.  poll and [id]notify
+events are triggered when the value changes.  This can be used, for
+example, to start a clean-up operation after all processes of a given
+sub-hierarchy have exited.  The populated state updates and
+notifications are recursive.  Consider the following sub-hierarchy
+where the numbers in the parentheses represent the numbers of processes
+in each cgroup::
+
+  A(4) - B(0) - C(1)
+              \ D(0)
+
+A, B and C's "populated" fields would be 1 while D's 0.  After the one
+process in C exits, B and C's "populated" fields would flip to "0" and
+file modified events will be generated on the "cgroup.events" files of
+both cgroups.
+
+
+Controlling Controllers
+-----------------------
+
+Enabling and Disabling
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Each cgroup has a "cgroup.controllers" file which lists all
+controllers available for the cgroup to enable::
+
+  # cat cgroup.controllers
+  cpu io memory
+
+No controller is enabled by default.  Controllers can be enabled and
+disabled by writing to the "cgroup.subtree_control" file::
+
+  # echo "+cpu +memory -io" > cgroup.subtree_control
+
+Only controllers which are listed in "cgroup.controllers" can be
+enabled.  When multiple operations are specified as above, either they
+all succeed or fail.  If multiple operations on the same controller
+are specified, the last one is effective.
+
+Enabling a controller in a cgroup indicates that the distribution of
+the target resource across its immediate children will be controlled.
+Consider the following sub-hierarchy.  The enabled controllers are
+listed in parentheses::
+
+  A(cpu,memory) - B(memory) - C()
+                            \ D()
+
+As A has "cpu" and "memory" enabled, A will control the distribution
+of CPU cycles and memory to its children, in this case, B.  As B has
+"memory" enabled but not "CPU", C and D will compete freely on CPU
+cycles but their division of memory available to B will be controlled.
+
+As a controller regulates the distribution of the target resource to
+the cgroup's children, enabling it creates the controller's interface
+files in the child cgroups.  In the above example, enabling "cpu" on B
+would create the "cpu." prefixed controller interface files in C and
+D.  Likewise, disabling "memory" from B would remove the "memory."
+prefixed controller interface files from C and D.  This means that the
+controller interface files - anything which doesn't start with
+"cgroup." are owned by the parent rather than the cgroup itself.
+
+
+Top-down Constraint
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Resources are distributed top-down and a cgroup can further distribute
+a resource only if the resource has been distributed to it from the
+parent.  This means that all non-root "cgroup.subtree_control" files
+can only contain controllers which are enabled in the parent's
+"cgroup.subtree_control" file.  A controller can be enabled only if
+the parent has the controller enabled and a controller can't be
+disabled if one or more children have it enabled.
+
+
+No Internal Process Constraint
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Non-root cgroups can distribute domain resources to their children
+only when they don't have any processes of their own.  In other words,
+only domain cgroups which don't contain any processes can have domain
+controllers enabled in their "cgroup.subtree_control" files.
+
+This guarantees that, when a domain controller is looking at the part
+of the hierarchy which has it enabled, processes are always only on
+the leaves.  This rules out situations where child cgroups compete
+against internal processes of the parent.
+
+The root cgroup is exempt from this restriction.  Root contains
+processes and anonymous resource consumption which can't be associated
+with any other cgroups and requires special treatment from most
+controllers.  How resource consumption in the root cgroup is governed
+is up to each controller (for more information on this topic please
+refer to the Non-normative information section in the Controllers
+chapter).
+
+Note that the restriction doesn't get in the way if there is no
+enabled controller in the cgroup's "cgroup.subtree_control".  This is
+important as otherwise it wouldn't be possible to create children of a
+populated cgroup.  To control resource distribution of a cgroup, the
+cgroup must create children and transfer all its processes to the
+children before enabling controllers in its "cgroup.subtree_control"
+file.
+
+
+Delegation
+----------
+
+Model of Delegation
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+A cgroup can be delegated in two ways.  First, to a less privileged
+user by granting write access of the directory and its "cgroup.procs",
+"cgroup.threads" and "cgroup.subtree_control" files to the user.
+Second, if the "nsdelegate" mount option is set, automatically to a
+cgroup namespace on namespace creation.
+
+Because the resource control interface files in a given directory
+control the distribution of the parent's resources, the delegatee
+shouldn't be allowed to write to them.  For the first method, this is
+achieved by not granting access to these files.  For the second, the
+kernel rejects writes to all files other than "cgroup.procs" and
+"cgroup.subtree_control" on a namespace root from inside the
+namespace.
+
+The end results are equivalent for both delegation types.  Once
+delegated, the user can build sub-hierarchy under the directory,
+organize processes inside it as it sees fit and further distribute the
+resources it received from the parent.  The limits and other settings
+of all resource controllers are hierarchical and regardless of what
+happens in the delegated sub-hierarchy, nothing can escape the
+resource restrictions imposed by the parent.
+
+Currently, cgroup doesn't impose any restrictions on the number of
+cgroups in or nesting depth of a delegated sub-hierarchy; however,
+this may be limited explicitly in the future.
+
+
+Delegation Containment
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+A delegated sub-hierarchy is contained in the sense that processes
+can't be moved into or out of the sub-hierarchy by the delegatee.
+
+For delegations to a less privileged user, this is achieved by
+requiring the following conditions for a process with a non-root euid
+to migrate a target process into a cgroup by writing its PID to the
+"cgroup.procs" file.
+
+- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
+
+- The writer must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
+  common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
+
+The above two constraints ensure that while a delegatee may migrate
+processes around freely in the delegated sub-hierarchy it can't pull
+in from or push out to outside the sub-hierarchy.
+
+For an example, let's assume cgroups C0 and C1 have been delegated to
+user U0 who created C00, C01 under C0 and C10 under C1 as follows and
+all processes under C0 and C1 belong to U0::
+
+  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C0 - C00
+  ~ cgroup    ~      \ C01
+  ~ hierarchy ~
+  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - C1 - C10
+
+Let's also say U0 wants to write the PID of a process which is
+currently in C10 into "C00/cgroup.procs".  U0 has write access to the
+file; however, the common ancestor of the source cgroup C10 and the
+destination cgroup C00 is above the points of delegation and U0 would
+not have write access to its "cgroup.procs" files and thus the write
+will be denied with -EACCES.
+
+For delegations to namespaces, containment is achieved by requiring
+that both the source and destination cgroups are reachable from the
+namespace of the process which is attempting the migration.  If either
+is not reachable, the migration is rejected with -ENOENT.
+
+
+Guidelines
+----------
+
+Organize Once and Control
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Migrating a process across cgroups is a relatively expensive operation
+and stateful resources such as memory are not moved together with the
+process.  This is an explicit design decision as there often exist
+inherent trade-offs between migration and various hot paths in terms
+of synchronization cost.
+
+As such, migrating processes across cgroups frequently as a means to
+apply different resource restrictions is discouraged.  A workload
+should be assigned to a cgroup according to the system's logical and
+resource structure once on start-up.  Dynamic adjustments to resource
+distribution can be made by changing controller configuration through
+the interface files.
+
+
+Avoid Name Collisions
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Interface files for a cgroup and its children cgroups occupy the same
+directory and it is possible to create children cgroups which collide
+with interface files.
+
+All cgroup core interface files are prefixed with "cgroup." and each
+controller's interface files are prefixed with the controller name and
+a dot.  A controller's name is composed of lower case alphabets and
+'_'s but never begins with an '_' so it can be used as the prefix
+character for collision avoidance.  Also, interface file names won't
+start or end with terms which are often used in categorizing workloads
+such as job, service, slice, unit or workload.
+
+cgroup doesn't do anything to prevent name collisions and it's the
+user's responsibility to avoid them.
+
+
+Resource Distribution Models
+============================
+
+cgroup controllers implement several resource distribution schemes
+depending on the resource type and expected use cases.  This section
+describes major schemes in use along with their expected behaviors.
+
+
+Weights
+-------
+
+A parent's resource is distributed by adding up the weights of all
+active children and giving each the fraction matching the ratio of its
+weight against the sum.  As only children which can make use of the
+resource at the moment participate in the distribution, this is
+work-conserving.  Due to the dynamic nature, this model is usually
+used for stateless resources.
+
+All weights are in the range [1, 10000] with the default at 100.  This
+allows symmetric multiplicative biases in both directions at fine
+enough granularity while staying in the intuitive range.
+
+As long as the weight is in range, all configuration combinations are
+valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
+process migrations.
+
+"cpu.weight" proportionally distributes CPU cycles to active children
+and is an example of this type.
+
+
+Limits
+------
+
+A child can only consume upto the configured amount of the resource.
+Limits can be over-committed - the sum of the limits of children can
+exceed the amount of resource available to the parent.
+
+Limits are in the range [0, max] and defaults to "max", which is noop.
+
+As limits can be over-committed, all configuration combinations are
+valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
+process migrations.
+
+"io.max" limits the maximum BPS and/or IOPS that a cgroup can consume
+on an IO device and is an example of this type.
+
+
+Protections
+-----------
+
+A cgroup is protected to be allocated upto the configured amount of
+the resource if the usages of all its ancestors are under their
+protected levels.  Protections can be hard guarantees or best effort
+soft boundaries.  Protections can also be over-committed in which case
+only upto the amount available to the parent is protected among
+children.
+
+Protections are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is
+noop.
+
+As protections can be over-committed, all configuration combinations
+are valid and there is no reason to reject configuration changes or
+process migrations.
+
+"memory.low" implements best-effort memory protection and is an
+example of this type.
+
+
+Allocations
+-----------
+
+A cgroup is exclusively allocated a certain amount of a finite
+resource.  Allocations can't be over-committed - the sum of the
+allocations of children can not exceed the amount of resource
+available to the parent.
+
+Allocations are in the range [0, max] and defaults to 0, which is no
+resource.
+
+As allocations can't be over-committed, some configuration
+combinations are invalid and should be rejected.  Also, if the
+resource is mandatory for execution of processes, process migrations
+may be rejected.
+
+"cpu.rt.max" hard-allocates realtime slices and is an example of this
+type.
+
+
+Interface Files
+===============
+
+Format
+------
+
+All interface files should be in one of the following formats whenever
+possible::
+
+  New-line separated values
+  (when only one value can be written at once)
+
+	VAL0\n
+	VAL1\n
+	...
+
+  Space separated values
+  (when read-only or multiple values can be written at once)
+
+	VAL0 VAL1 ...\n
+
+  Flat keyed
+
+	KEY0 VAL0\n
+	KEY1 VAL1\n
+	...
+
+  Nested keyed
+
+	KEY0 SUB_KEY0=VAL00 SUB_KEY1=VAL01...
+	KEY1 SUB_KEY0=VAL10 SUB_KEY1=VAL11...
+	...
+
+For a writable file, the format for writing should generally match
+reading; however, controllers may allow omitting later fields or
+implement restricted shortcuts for most common use cases.
+
+For both flat and nested keyed files, only the values for a single key
+can be written at a time.  For nested keyed files, the sub key pairs
+may be specified in any order and not all pairs have to be specified.
+
+
+Conventions
+-----------
+
+- Settings for a single feature should be contained in a single file.
+
+- The root cgroup should be exempt from resource control and thus
+  shouldn't have resource control interface files.  Also,
+  informational files on the root cgroup which end up showing global
+  information available elsewhere shouldn't exist.
+
+- If a controller implements weight based resource distribution, its
+  interface file should be named "weight" and have the range [1,
+  10000] with 100 as the default.  The values are chosen to allow
+  enough and symmetric bias in both directions while keeping it
+  intuitive (the default is 100%).
+
+- If a controller implements an absolute resource guarantee and/or
+  limit, the interface files should be named "min" and "max"
+  respectively.  If a controller implements best effort resource
+  guarantee and/or limit, the interface files should be named "low"
+  and "high" respectively.
+
+  In the above four control files, the special token "max" should be
+  used to represent upward infinity for both reading and writing.
+
+- If a setting has a configurable default value and keyed specific
+  overrides, the default entry should be keyed with "default" and
+  appear as the first entry in the file.
+
+  The default value can be updated by writing either "default $VAL" or
+  "$VAL".
+
+  When writing to update a specific override, "default" can be used as
+  the value to indicate removal of the override.  Override entries
+  with "default" as the value must not appear when read.
+
+  For example, a setting which is keyed by major:minor device numbers
+  with integer values may look like the following::
+
+    # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
+    default 150
+    8:0 300
+
+  The default value can be updated by::
+
+    # echo 125 > cgroup-example-interface-file
+
+  or::
+
+    # echo "default 125" > cgroup-example-interface-file
+
+  An override can be set by::
+
+    # echo "8:16 170" > cgroup-example-interface-file
+
+  and cleared by::
+
+    # echo "8:0 default" > cgroup-example-interface-file
+    # cat cgroup-example-interface-file
+    default 125
+    8:16 170
+
+- For events which are not very high frequency, an interface file
+  "events" should be created which lists event key value pairs.
+  Whenever a notifiable event happens, file modified event should be
+  generated on the file.
+
+
+Core Interface Files
+--------------------
+
+All cgroup core files are prefixed with "cgroup."
+
+  cgroup.type
+
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.
+
+	When read, it indicates the current type of the cgroup, which
+	can be one of the following values.
+
+	- "domain" : A normal valid domain cgroup.
+
+	- "domain threaded" : A threaded domain cgroup which is
+          serving as the root of a threaded subtree.
+
+	- "domain invalid" : A cgroup which is in an invalid state.
+	  It can't be populated or have controllers enabled.  It may
+	  be allowed to become a threaded cgroup.
+
+	- "threaded" : A threaded cgroup which is a member of a
+          threaded subtree.
+
+	A cgroup can be turned into a threaded cgroup by writing
+	"threaded" to this file.
+
+  cgroup.procs
+	A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
+	all cgroups.
+
+	When read, it lists the PIDs of all processes which belong to
+	the cgroup one-per-line.  The PIDs are not ordered and the
+	same PID may show up more than once if the process got moved
+	to another cgroup and then back or the PID got recycled while
+	reading.
+
+	A PID can be written to migrate the process associated with
+	the PID to the cgroup.  The writer should match all of the
+	following conditions.
+
+	- It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file.
+
+	- It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
+	  common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
+
+	When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
+	should be granted along with the containing directory.
+
+	In a threaded cgroup, reading this file fails with EOPNOTSUPP
+	as all the processes belong to the thread root.  Writing is
+	supported and moves every thread of the process to the cgroup.
+
+  cgroup.threads
+	A read-write new-line separated values file which exists on
+	all cgroups.
+
+	When read, it lists the TIDs of all threads which belong to
+	the cgroup one-per-line.  The TIDs are not ordered and the
+	same TID may show up more than once if the thread got moved to
+	another cgroup and then back or the TID got recycled while
+	reading.
+
+	A TID can be written to migrate the thread associated with the
+	TID to the cgroup.  The writer should match all of the
+	following conditions.
+
+	- It must have write access to the "cgroup.threads" file.
+
+	- The cgroup that the thread is currently in must be in the
+          same resource domain as the destination cgroup.
+
+	- It must have write access to the "cgroup.procs" file of the
+	  common ancestor of the source and destination cgroups.
+
+	When delegating a sub-hierarchy, write access to this file
+	should be granted along with the containing directory.
+
+  cgroup.controllers
+	A read-only space separated values file which exists on all
+	cgroups.
+
+	It shows space separated list of all controllers available to
+	the cgroup.  The controllers are not ordered.
+
+  cgroup.subtree_control
+	A read-write space separated values file which exists on all
+	cgroups.  Starts out empty.
+
+	When read, it shows space separated list of the controllers
+	which are enabled to control resource distribution from the
+	cgroup to its children.
+
+	Space separated list of controllers prefixed with '+' or '-'
+	can be written to enable or disable controllers.  A controller
+	name prefixed with '+' enables the controller and '-'
+	disables.  If a controller appears more than once on the list,
+	the last one is effective.  When multiple enable and disable
+	operations are specified, either all succeed or all fail.
+
+  cgroup.events
+	A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
+	The following entries are defined.  Unless specified
+	otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
+	modified event.
+
+	  populated
+		1 if the cgroup or its descendants contains any live
+		processes; otherwise, 0.
+
+  cgroup.max.descendants
+	A read-write single value files.  The default is "max".
+
+	Maximum allowed number of descent cgroups.
+	If the actual number of descendants is equal or larger,
+	an attempt to create a new cgroup in the hierarchy will fail.
+
+  cgroup.max.depth
+	A read-write single value files.  The default is "max".
+
+	Maximum allowed descent depth below the current cgroup.
+	If the actual descent depth is equal or larger,
+	an attempt to create a new child cgroup will fail.
+
+  cgroup.stat
+	A read-only flat-keyed file with the following entries:
+
+	  nr_descendants
+		Total number of visible descendant cgroups.
+
+	  nr_dying_descendants
+		Total number of dying descendant cgroups. A cgroup becomes
+		dying after being deleted by a user. The cgroup will remain
+		in dying state for some time undefined time (which can depend
+		on system load) before being completely destroyed.
+
+		A process can't enter a dying cgroup under any circumstances,
+		a dying cgroup can't revive.
+
+		A dying cgroup can consume system resources not exceeding
+		limits, which were active at the moment of cgroup deletion.
+
+
+Controllers
+===========
+
+CPU
+---
+
+The "cpu" controllers regulates distribution of CPU cycles.  This
+controller implements weight and absolute bandwidth limit models for
+normal scheduling policy and absolute bandwidth allocation model for
+realtime scheduling policy.
+
+WARNING: cgroup2 doesn't yet support control of realtime processes and
+the cpu controller can only be enabled when all RT processes are in
+the root cgroup.  Be aware that system management software may already
+have placed RT processes into nonroot cgroups during the system boot
+process, and these processes may need to be moved to the root cgroup
+before the cpu controller can be enabled.
+
+
+CPU Interface Files
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+All time durations are in microseconds.
+
+  cpu.stat
+	A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
+	This file exists whether the controller is enabled or not.
+
+	It always reports the following three stats:
+
+	- usage_usec
+	- user_usec
+	- system_usec
+
+	and the following three when the controller is enabled:
+
+	- nr_periods
+	- nr_throttled
+	- throttled_usec
+
+  cpu.weight
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.  The default is "100".
+
+	The weight in the range [1, 10000].
+
+  cpu.weight.nice
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.  The default is "0".
+
+	The nice value is in the range [-20, 19].
+
+	This interface file is an alternative interface for
+	"cpu.weight" and allows reading and setting weight using the
+	same values used by nice(2).  Because the range is smaller and
+	granularity is coarser for the nice values, the read value is
+	the closest approximation of the current weight.
+
+  cpu.max
+	A read-write two value file which exists on non-root cgroups.
+	The default is "max 100000".
+
+	The maximum bandwidth limit.  It's in the following format::
+
+	  $MAX $PERIOD
+
+	which indicates that the group may consume upto $MAX in each
+	$PERIOD duration.  "max" for $MAX indicates no limit.  If only
+	one number is written, $MAX is updated.
+
+
+Memory
+------
+
+The "memory" controller regulates distribution of memory.  Memory is
+stateful and implements both limit and protection models.  Due to the
+intertwining between memory usage and reclaim pressure and the
+stateful nature of memory, the distribution model is relatively
+complex.
+
+While not completely water-tight, all major memory usages by a given
+cgroup are tracked so that the total memory consumption can be
+accounted and controlled to a reasonable extent.  Currently, the
+following types of memory usages are tracked.
+
+- Userland memory - page cache and anonymous memory.
+
+- Kernel data structures such as dentries and inodes.
+
+- TCP socket buffers.
+
+The above list may expand in the future for better coverage.
+
+
+Memory Interface Files
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+All memory amounts are in bytes.  If a value which is not aligned to
+PAGE_SIZE is written, the value may be rounded up to the closest
+PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
+
+  memory.current
+	A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.
+
+	The total amount of memory currently being used by the cgroup
+	and its descendants.
+
+  memory.low
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.  The default is "0".
+
+	Best-effort memory protection.  If the memory usages of a
+	cgroup and all its ancestors are below their low boundaries,
+	the cgroup's memory won't be reclaimed unless memory can be
+	reclaimed from unprotected cgroups.
+
+	Putting more memory than generally available under this
+	protection is discouraged.
+
+  memory.high
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.  The default is "max".
+
+	Memory usage throttle limit.  This is the main mechanism to
+	control memory usage of a cgroup.  If a cgroup's usage goes
+	over the high boundary, the processes of the cgroup are
+	throttled and put under heavy reclaim pressure.
+
+	Going over the high limit never invokes the OOM killer and
+	under extreme conditions the limit may be breached.
+
+  memory.max
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.  The default is "max".
+
+	Memory usage hard limit.  This is the final protection
+	mechanism.  If a cgroup's memory usage reaches this limit and
+	can't be reduced, the OOM killer is invoked in the cgroup.
+	Under certain circumstances, the usage may go over the limit
+	temporarily.
+
+	This is the ultimate protection mechanism.  As long as the
+	high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
+	utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
+
+  memory.events
+	A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
+	The following entries are defined.  Unless specified
+	otherwise, a value change in this file generates a file
+	modified event.
+
+	  low
+		The number of times the cgroup is reclaimed due to
+		high memory pressure even though its usage is under
+		the low boundary.  This usually indicates that the low
+		boundary is over-committed.
+
+	  high
+		The number of times processes of the cgroup are
+		throttled and routed to perform direct memory reclaim
+		because the high memory boundary was exceeded.  For a
+		cgroup whose memory usage is capped by the high limit
+		rather than global memory pressure, this event's
+		occurrences are expected.
+
+	  max
+		The number of times the cgroup's memory usage was
+		about to go over the max boundary.  If direct reclaim
+		fails to bring it down, the cgroup goes to OOM state.
+
+	  oom
+		The number of time the cgroup's memory usage was
+		reached the limit and allocation was about to fail.
+
+		Depending on context result could be invocation of OOM
+		killer and retrying allocation or failing allocation.
+
+		Failed allocation in its turn could be returned into
+		userspace as -ENOMEM or silently ignored in cases like
+		disk readahead.  For now OOM in memory cgroup kills
+		tasks iff shortage has happened inside page fault.
+
+	  oom_kill
+		The number of processes belonging to this cgroup
+		killed by any kind of OOM killer.
+
+  memory.stat
+	A read-only flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
+
+	This breaks down the cgroup's memory footprint into different
+	types of memory, type-specific details, and other information
+	on the state and past events of the memory management system.
+
+	All memory amounts are in bytes.
+
+	The entries are ordered to be human readable, and new entries
+	can show up in the middle. Don't rely on items remaining in a
+	fixed position; use the keys to look up specific values!
+
+	  anon
+		Amount of memory used in anonymous mappings such as
+		brk(), sbrk(), and mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS)
+
+	  file
+		Amount of memory used to cache filesystem data,
+		including tmpfs and shared memory.
+
+	  kernel_stack
+		Amount of memory allocated to kernel stacks.
+
+	  slab
+		Amount of memory used for storing in-kernel data
+		structures.
+
+	  sock
+		Amount of memory used in network transmission buffers
+
+	  shmem
+		Amount of cached filesystem data that is swap-backed,
+		such as tmpfs, shm segments, shared anonymous mmap()s
+
+	  file_mapped
+		Amount of cached filesystem data mapped with mmap()
+
+	  file_dirty
+		Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified but
+		not yet written back to disk
+
+	  file_writeback
+		Amount of cached filesystem data that was modified and
+		is currently being written back to disk
+
+	  inactive_anon, active_anon, inactive_file, active_file, unevictable
+		Amount of memory, swap-backed and filesystem-backed,
+		on the internal memory management lists used by the
+		page reclaim algorithm
+
+	  slab_reclaimable
+		Part of "slab" that might be reclaimed, such as
+		dentries and inodes.
+
+	  slab_unreclaimable
+		Part of "slab" that cannot be reclaimed on memory
+		pressure.
+
+	  pgfault
+		Total number of page faults incurred
+
+	  pgmajfault
+		Number of major page faults incurred
+
+	  workingset_refault
+
+		Number of refaults of previously evicted pages
+
+	  workingset_activate
+
+		Number of refaulted pages that were immediately activated
+
+	  workingset_nodereclaim
+
+		Number of times a shadow node has been reclaimed
+
+	  pgrefill
+
+		Amount of scanned pages (in an active LRU list)
+
+	  pgscan
+
+		Amount of scanned pages (in an inactive LRU list)
+
+	  pgsteal
+
+		Amount of reclaimed pages
+
+	  pgactivate
+
+		Amount of pages moved to the active LRU list
+
+	  pgdeactivate
+
+		Amount of pages moved to the inactive LRU lis
+
+	  pglazyfree
+
+		Amount of pages postponed to be freed under memory pressure
+
+	  pglazyfreed
+
+		Amount of reclaimed lazyfree pages
+
+  memory.swap.current
+	A read-only single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.
+
+	The total amount of swap currently being used by the cgroup
+	and its descendants.
+
+  memory.swap.max
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.  The default is "max".
+
+	Swap usage hard limit.  If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
+	limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
+
+
+Usage Guidelines
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+"memory.high" is the main mechanism to control memory usage.
+Over-committing on high limit (sum of high limits > available memory)
+and letting global memory pressure to distribute memory according to
+usage is a viable strategy.
+
+Because breach of the high limit doesn't trigger the OOM killer but
+throttles the offending cgroup, a management agent has ample
+opportunities to monitor and take appropriate actions such as granting
+more memory or terminating the workload.
+
+Determining whether a cgroup has enough memory is not trivial as
+memory usage doesn't indicate whether the workload can benefit from
+more memory.  For example, a workload which writes data received from
+network to a file can use all available memory but can also operate as
+performant with a small amount of memory.  A measure of memory
+pressure - how much the workload is being impacted due to lack of
+memory - is necessary to determine whether a workload needs more
+memory; unfortunately, memory pressure monitoring mechanism isn't
+implemented yet.
+
+
+Memory Ownership
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+A memory area is charged to the cgroup which instantiated it and stays
+charged to the cgroup until the area is released.  Migrating a process
+to a different cgroup doesn't move the memory usages that it
+instantiated while in the previous cgroup to the new cgroup.
+
+A memory area may be used by processes belonging to different cgroups.
+To which cgroup the area will be charged is in-deterministic; however,
+over time, the memory area is likely to end up in a cgroup which has
+enough memory allowance to avoid high reclaim pressure.
+
+If a cgroup sweeps a considerable amount of memory which is expected
+to be accessed repeatedly by other cgroups, it may make sense to use
+POSIX_FADV_DONTNEED to relinquish the ownership of memory areas
+belonging to the affected files to ensure correct memory ownership.
+
+
+IO
+--
+
+The "io" controller regulates the distribution of IO resources.  This
+controller implements both weight based and absolute bandwidth or IOPS
+limit distribution; however, weight based distribution is available
+only if cfq-iosched is in use and neither scheme is available for
+blk-mq devices.
+
+
+IO Interface Files
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+  io.stat
+	A read-only nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.
+
+	Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.
+	The following nested keys are defined.
+
+	  ======	===================
+	  rbytes	Bytes read
+	  wbytes	Bytes written
+	  rios		Number of read IOs
+	  wios		Number of write IOs
+	  ======	===================
+
+	An example read output follows:
+
+	  8:16 rbytes=1459200 wbytes=314773504 rios=192 wios=353
+	  8:0 rbytes=90430464 wbytes=299008000 rios=8950 wios=1252
+
+  io.weight
+	A read-write flat-keyed file which exists on non-root cgroups.
+	The default is "default 100".
+
+	The first line is the default weight applied to devices
+	without specific override.  The rest are overrides keyed by
+	$MAJ:$MIN device numbers and not ordered.  The weights are in
+	the range [1, 10000] and specifies the relative amount IO time
+	the cgroup can use in relation to its siblings.
+
+	The default weight can be updated by writing either "default
+	$WEIGHT" or simply "$WEIGHT".  Overrides can be set by writing
+	"$MAJ:$MIN $WEIGHT" and unset by writing "$MAJ:$MIN default".
+
+	An example read output follows::
+
+	  default 100
+	  8:16 200
+	  8:0 50
+
+  io.max
+	A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.
+
+	BPS and IOPS based IO limit.  Lines are keyed by $MAJ:$MIN
+	device numbers and not ordered.  The following nested keys are
+	defined.
+
+	  =====		==================================
+	  rbps		Max read bytes per second
+	  wbps		Max write bytes per second
+	  riops		Max read IO operations per second
+	  wiops		Max write IO operations per second
+	  =====		==================================
+
+	When writing, any number of nested key-value pairs can be
+	specified in any order.  "max" can be specified as the value
+	to remove a specific limit.  If the same key is specified
+	multiple times, the outcome is undefined.
+
+	BPS and IOPS are measured in each IO direction and IOs are
+	delayed if limit is reached.  Temporary bursts are allowed.
+
+	Setting read limit at 2M BPS and write at 120 IOPS for 8:16::
+
+	  echo "8:16 rbps=2097152 wiops=120" > io.max
+
+	Reading returns the following::
+
+	  8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=120
+
+	Write IOPS limit can be removed by writing the following::
+
+	  echo "8:16 wiops=max" > io.max
+
+	Reading now returns the following::
+
+	  8:16 rbps=2097152 wbps=max riops=max wiops=max
+
+
+Writeback
+~~~~~~~~~
+
+Page cache is dirtied through buffered writes and shared mmaps and
+written asynchronously to the backing filesystem by the writeback
+mechanism.  Writeback sits between the memory and IO domains and
+regulates the proportion of dirty memory by balancing dirtying and
+write IOs.
+
+The io controller, in conjunction with the memory controller,
+implements control of page cache writeback IOs.  The memory controller
+defines the memory domain that dirty memory ratio is calculated and
+maintained for and the io controller defines the io domain which
+writes out dirty pages for the memory domain.  Both system-wide and
+per-cgroup dirty memory states are examined and the more restrictive
+of the two is enforced.
+
+cgroup writeback requires explicit support from the underlying
+filesystem.  Currently, cgroup writeback is implemented on ext2, ext4
+and btrfs.  On other filesystems, all writeback IOs are attributed to
+the root cgroup.
+
+There are inherent differences in memory and writeback management
+which affects how cgroup ownership is tracked.  Memory is tracked per
+page while writeback per inode.  For the purpose of writeback, an
+inode is assigned to a cgroup and all IO requests to write dirty pages
+from the inode are attributed to that cgroup.
+
+As cgroup ownership for memory is tracked per page, there can be pages
+which are associated with different cgroups than the one the inode is
+associated with.  These are called foreign pages.  The writeback
+constantly keeps track of foreign pages and, if a particular foreign
+cgroup becomes the majority over a certain period of time, switches
+the ownership of the inode to that cgroup.
+
+While this model is enough for most use cases where a given inode is
+mostly dirtied by a single cgroup even when the main writing cgroup
+changes over time, use cases where multiple cgroups write to a single
+inode simultaneously are not supported well.  In such circumstances, a
+significant portion of IOs are likely to be attributed incorrectly.
+As memory controller assigns page ownership on the first use and
+doesn't update it until the page is released, even if writeback
+strictly follows page ownership, multiple cgroups dirtying overlapping
+areas wouldn't work as expected.  It's recommended to avoid such usage
+patterns.
+
+The sysctl knobs which affect writeback behavior are applied to cgroup
+writeback as follows.
+
+  vm.dirty_background_ratio, vm.dirty_ratio
+	These ratios apply the same to cgroup writeback with the
+	amount of available memory capped by limits imposed by the
+	memory controller and system-wide clean memory.
+
+  vm.dirty_background_bytes, vm.dirty_bytes
+	For cgroup writeback, this is calculated into ratio against
+	total available memory and applied the same way as
+	vm.dirty[_background]_ratio.
+
+
+PID
+---
+
+The process number controller is used to allow a cgroup to stop any
+new tasks from being fork()'d or clone()'d after a specified limit is
+reached.
+
+The number of tasks in a cgroup can be exhausted in ways which other
+controllers cannot prevent, thus warranting its own controller.  For
+example, a fork bomb is likely to exhaust the number of tasks before
+hitting memory restrictions.
+
+Note that PIDs used in this controller refer to TIDs, process IDs as
+used by the kernel.
+
+
+PID Interface Files
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+  pids.max
+	A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
+	cgroups.  The default is "max".
+
+	Hard limit of number of processes.
+
+  pids.current
+	A read-only single value file which exists on all cgroups.
+
+	The number of processes currently in the cgroup and its
+	descendants.
+
+Organisational operations are not blocked by cgroup policies, so it is
+possible to have pids.current > pids.max.  This can be done by either
+setting the limit to be smaller than pids.current, or attaching enough
+processes to the cgroup such that pids.current is larger than
+pids.max.  However, it is not possible to violate a cgroup PID policy
+through fork() or clone(). These will return -EAGAIN if the creation
+of a new process would cause a cgroup policy to be violated.
+
+
+Device controller
+-----------------
+
+Device controller manages access to device files. It includes both
+creation of new device files (using mknod), and access to the
+existing device files.
+
+Cgroup v2 device controller has no interface files and is implemented
+on top of cgroup BPF. To control access to device files, a user may
+create bpf programs of the BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE type and attach them
+to cgroups. On an attempt to access a device file, corresponding
+BPF programs will be executed, and depending on the return value
+the attempt will succeed or fail with -EPERM.
+
+A BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program takes a pointer to the bpf_cgroup_dev_ctx
+structure, which describes the device access attempt: access type
+(mknod/read/write) and device (type, major and minor numbers).
+If the program returns 0, the attempt fails with -EPERM, otherwise
+it succeeds.
+
+An example of BPF_CGROUP_DEVICE program may be found in the kernel
+source tree in the tools/testing/selftests/bpf/dev_cgroup.c file.
+
+
+RDMA
+----
+
+The "rdma" controller regulates the distribution and accounting of
+of RDMA resources.
+
+RDMA Interface Files
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+  rdma.max
+	A readwrite nested-keyed file that exists for all the cgroups
+	except root that describes current configured resource limit
+	for a RDMA/IB device.
+
+	Lines are keyed by device name and are not ordered.
+	Each line contains space separated resource name and its configured
+	limit that can be distributed.
+
+	The following nested keys are defined.
+
+	  ==========	=============================
+	  hca_handle	Maximum number of HCA Handles
+	  hca_object 	Maximum number of HCA Objects
+	  ==========	=============================
+
+	An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
+
+	  mlx4_0 hca_handle=2 hca_object=2000
+	  ocrdma1 hca_handle=3 hca_object=max
+
+  rdma.current
+	A read-only file that describes current resource usage.
+	It exists for all the cgroup except root.
+
+	An example for mlx4 and ocrdma device follows::
+
+	  mlx4_0 hca_handle=1 hca_object=20
+	  ocrdma1 hca_handle=1 hca_object=23
+
+
+Misc
+----
+
+perf_event
+~~~~~~~~~~
+
+perf_event controller, if not mounted on a legacy hierarchy, is
+automatically enabled on the v2 hierarchy so that perf events can
+always be filtered by cgroup v2 path.  The controller can still be
+moved to a legacy hierarchy after v2 hierarchy is populated.
+
+
+Non-normative information
+-------------------------
+
+This section contains information that isn't considered to be a part of
+the stable kernel API and so is subject to change.
+
+
+CPU controller root cgroup process behaviour
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+When distributing CPU cycles in the root cgroup each thread in this
+cgroup is treated as if it was hosted in a separate child cgroup of the
+root cgroup. This child cgroup weight is dependent on its thread nice
+level.
+
+For details of this mapping see sched_prio_to_weight array in
+kernel/sched/core.c file (values from this array should be scaled
+appropriately so the neutral - nice 0 - value is 100 instead of 1024).
+
+
+IO controller root cgroup process behaviour
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+Root cgroup processes are hosted in an implicit leaf child node.
+When distributing IO resources this implicit child node is taken into
+account as if it was a normal child cgroup of the root cgroup with a
+weight value of 200.
+
+
+Namespace
+=========
+
+Basics
+------
+
+cgroup namespace provides a mechanism to virtualize the view of the
+"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file and cgroup mounts.  The CLONE_NEWCGROUP clone
+flag can be used with clone(2) and unshare(2) to create a new cgroup
+namespace.  The process running inside the cgroup namespace will have
+its "/proc/$PID/cgroup" output restricted to cgroupns root.  The
+cgroupns root is the cgroup of the process at the time of creation of
+the cgroup namespace.
+
+Without cgroup namespace, the "/proc/$PID/cgroup" file shows the
+complete path of the cgroup of a process.  In a container setup where
+a set of cgroups and namespaces are intended to isolate processes the
+"/proc/$PID/cgroup" file may leak potential system level information
+to the isolated processes.  For Example::
+
+  # cat /proc/self/cgroup
+  0::/batchjobs/container_id1
+
+The path '/batchjobs/container_id1' can be considered as system-data
+and undesirable to expose to the isolated processes.  cgroup namespace
+can be used to restrict visibility of this path.  For example, before
+creating a cgroup namespace, one would see::
+
+  # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
+  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:37 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026531835]
+  # cat /proc/self/cgroup
+  0::/batchjobs/container_id1
+
+After unsharing a new namespace, the view changes::
+
+  # ls -l /proc/self/ns/cgroup
+  lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 2014-07-15 10:35 /proc/self/ns/cgroup -> cgroup:[4026532183]
+  # cat /proc/self/cgroup
+  0::/
+
+When some thread from a multi-threaded process unshares its cgroup
+namespace, the new cgroupns gets applied to the entire process (all
+the threads).  This is natural for the v2 hierarchy; however, for the
+legacy hierarchies, this may be unexpected.
+
+A cgroup namespace is alive as long as there are processes inside or
+mounts pinning it.  When the last usage goes away, the cgroup
+namespace is destroyed.  The cgroupns root and the actual cgroups
+remain.
+
+
+The Root and Views
+------------------
+
+The 'cgroupns root' for a cgroup namespace is the cgroup in which the
+process calling unshare(2) is running.  For example, if a process in
+/batchjobs/container_id1 cgroup calls unshare, cgroup
+/batchjobs/container_id1 becomes the cgroupns root.  For the
+init_cgroup_ns, this is the real root ('/') cgroup.
+
+The cgroupns root cgroup does not change even if the namespace creator
+process later moves to a different cgroup::
+
+  # ~/unshare -c # unshare cgroupns in some cgroup
+  # cat /proc/self/cgroup
+  0::/
+  # mkdir sub_cgrp_1
+  # echo 0 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
+  # cat /proc/self/cgroup
+  0::/sub_cgrp_1
+
+Each process gets its namespace-specific view of "/proc/$PID/cgroup"
+
+Processes running inside the cgroup namespace will be able to see
+cgroup paths (in /proc/self/cgroup) only inside their root cgroup.
+From within an unshared cgroupns::
+
+  # sleep 100000 &
+  [1] 7353
+  # echo 7353 > sub_cgrp_1/cgroup.procs
+  # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
+  0::/sub_cgrp_1
+
+From the initial cgroup namespace, the real cgroup path will be
+visible::
+
+  $ cat /proc/7353/cgroup
+  0::/batchjobs/container_id1/sub_cgrp_1
+
+From a sibling cgroup namespace (that is, a namespace rooted at a
+different cgroup), the cgroup path relative to its own cgroup
+namespace root will be shown.  For instance, if PID 7353's cgroup
+namespace root is at '/batchjobs/container_id2', then it will see::
+
+  # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
+  0::/../container_id2/sub_cgrp_1
+
+Note that the relative path always starts with '/' to indicate that
+its relative to the cgroup namespace root of the caller.
+
+
+Migration and setns(2)
+----------------------
+
+Processes inside a cgroup namespace can move into and out of the
+namespace root if they have proper access to external cgroups.  For
+example, from inside a namespace with cgroupns root at
+/batchjobs/container_id1, and assuming that the global hierarchy is
+still accessible inside cgroupns::
+
+  # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
+  0::/sub_cgrp_1
+  # echo 7353 > batchjobs/container_id2/cgroup.procs
+  # cat /proc/7353/cgroup
+  0::/../container_id2
+
+Note that this kind of setup is not encouraged.  A task inside cgroup
+namespace should only be exposed to its own cgroupns hierarchy.
+
+setns(2) to another cgroup namespace is allowed when:
+
+(a) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its current user namespace
+(b) the process has CAP_SYS_ADMIN against the target cgroup
+    namespace's userns
+
+No implicit cgroup changes happen with attaching to another cgroup
+namespace.  It is expected that the someone moves the attaching
+process under the target cgroup namespace root.
+
+
+Interaction with Other Namespaces
+---------------------------------
+
+Namespace specific cgroup hierarchy can be mounted by a process
+running inside a non-init cgroup namespace::
+
+  # mount -t cgroup2 none $MOUNT_POINT
+
+This will mount the unified cgroup hierarchy with cgroupns root as the
+filesystem root.  The process needs CAP_SYS_ADMIN against its user and
+mount namespaces.
+
+The virtualization of /proc/self/cgroup file combined with restricting
+the view of cgroup hierarchy by namespace-private cgroupfs mount
+provides a properly isolated cgroup view inside the container.
+
+
+Information on Kernel Programming
+=================================
+
+This section contains kernel programming information in the areas
+where interacting with cgroup is necessary.  cgroup core and
+controllers are not covered.
+
+
+Filesystem Support for Writeback
+--------------------------------
+
+A filesystem can support cgroup writeback by updating
+address_space_operations->writepage[s]() to annotate bio's using the
+following two functions.
+
+  wbc_init_bio(@wbc, @bio)
+	Should be called for each bio carrying writeback data and
+	associates the bio with the inode's owner cgroup.  Can be
+	called anytime between bio allocation and submission.
+
+  wbc_account_io(@wbc, @page, @bytes)
+	Should be called for each data segment being written out.
+	While this function doesn't care exactly when it's called
+	during the writeback session, it's the easiest and most
+	natural to call it as data segments are added to a bio.
+
+With writeback bio's annotated, cgroup support can be enabled per
+super_block by setting SB_I_CGROUPWB in ->s_iflags.  This allows for
+selective disabling of cgroup writeback support which is helpful when
+certain filesystem features, e.g. journaled data mode, are
+incompatible.
+
+wbc_init_bio() binds the specified bio to its cgroup.  Depending on
+the configuration, the bio may be executed at a lower priority and if
+the writeback session is holding shared resources, e.g. a journal
+entry, may lead to priority inversion.  There is no one easy solution
+for the problem.  Filesystems can try to work around specific problem
+cases by skipping wbc_init_bio() or using bio_associate_blkcg()
+directly.
+
+
+Deprecated v1 Core Features
+===========================
+
+- Multiple hierarchies including named ones are not supported.
+
+- All v1 mount options are not supported.
+
+- The "tasks" file is removed and "cgroup.procs" is not sorted.
+
+- "cgroup.clone_children" is removed.
+
+- /proc/cgroups is meaningless for v2.  Use "cgroup.controllers" file
+  at the root instead.
+
+
+Issues with v1 and Rationales for v2
+====================================
+
+Multiple Hierarchies
+--------------------
+
+cgroup v1 allowed an arbitrary number of hierarchies and each
+hierarchy could host any number of controllers.  While this seemed to
+provide a high level of flexibility, it wasn't useful in practice.
+
+For example, as there is only one instance of each controller, utility
+type controllers such as freezer which can be useful in all
+hierarchies could only be used in one.  The issue is exacerbated by
+the fact that controllers couldn't be moved to another hierarchy once
+hierarchies were populated.  Another issue was that all controllers
+bound to a hierarchy were forced to have exactly the same view of the
+hierarchy.  It wasn't possible to vary the granularity depending on
+the specific controller.
+
+In practice, these issues heavily limited which controllers could be
+put on the same hierarchy and most configurations resorted to putting
+each controller on its own hierarchy.  Only closely related ones, such
+as the cpu and cpuacct controllers, made sense to be put on the same
+hierarchy.  This often meant that userland ended up managing multiple
+similar hierarchies repeating the same steps on each hierarchy
+whenever a hierarchy management operation was necessary.
+
+Furthermore, support for multiple hierarchies came at a steep cost.
+It greatly complicated cgroup core implementation but more importantly
+the support for multiple hierarchies restricted how cgroup could be
+used in general and what controllers was able to do.
+
+There was no limit on how many hierarchies there might be, which meant
+that a thread's cgroup membership couldn't be described in finite
+length.  The key might contain any number of entries and was unlimited
+in length, which made it highly awkward to manipulate and led to
+addition of controllers which existed only to identify membership,
+which in turn exacerbated the original problem of proliferating number
+of hierarchies.
+
+Also, as a controller couldn't have any expectation regarding the
+topologies of hierarchies other controllers might be on, each
+controller had to assume that all other controllers were attached to
+completely orthogonal hierarchies.  This made it impossible, or at
+least very cumbersome, for controllers to cooperate with each other.
+
+In most use cases, putting controllers on hierarchies which are
+completely orthogonal to each other isn't necessary.  What usually is
+called for is the ability to have differing levels of granularity
+depending on the specific controller.  In other words, hierarchy may
+be collapsed from leaf towards root when viewed from specific
+controllers.  For example, a given configuration might not care about
+how memory is distributed beyond a certain level while still wanting
+to control how CPU cycles are distributed.
+
+
+Thread Granularity
+------------------
+
+cgroup v1 allowed threads of a process to belong to different cgroups.
+This didn't make sense for some controllers and those controllers
+ended up implementing different ways to ignore such situations but
+much more importantly it blurred the line between API exposed to
+individual applications and system management interface.
+
+Generally, in-process knowledge is available only to the process
+itself; thus, unlike service-level organization of processes,
+categorizing threads of a process requires active participation from
+the application which owns the target process.
+
+cgroup v1 had an ambiguously defined delegation model which got abused
+in combination with thread granularity.  cgroups were delegated to
+individual applications so that they can create and manage their own
+sub-hierarchies and control resource distributions along them.  This
+effectively raised cgroup to the status of a syscall-like API exposed
+to lay programs.
+
+First of all, cgroup has a fundamentally inadequate interface to be
+exposed this way.  For a process to access its own knobs, it has to
+extract the path on the target hierarchy from /proc/self/cgroup,
+construct the path by appending the name of the knob to the path, open
+and then read and/or write to it.  This is not only extremely clunky
+and unusual but also inherently racy.  There is no conventional way to
+define transaction across the required steps and nothing can guarantee
+that the process would actually be operating on its own sub-hierarchy.
+
+cgroup controllers implemented a number of knobs which would never be
+accepted as public APIs because they were just adding control knobs to
+system-management pseudo filesystem.  cgroup ended up with interface
+knobs which were not properly abstracted or refined and directly
+revealed kernel internal details.  These knobs got exposed to
+individual applications through the ill-defined delegation mechanism
+effectively abusing cgroup as a shortcut to implementing public APIs
+without going through the required scrutiny.
+
+This was painful for both userland and kernel.  Userland ended up with
+misbehaving and poorly abstracted interfaces and kernel exposing and
+locked into constructs inadvertently.
+
+
+Competition Between Inner Nodes and Threads
+-------------------------------------------
+
+cgroup v1 allowed threads to be in any cgroups which created an
+interesting problem where threads belonging to a parent cgroup and its
+children cgroups competed for resources.  This was nasty as two
+different types of entities competed and there was no obvious way to
+settle it.  Different controllers did different things.
+
+The cpu controller considered threads and cgroups as equivalents and
+mapped nice levels to cgroup weights.  This worked for some cases but
+fell flat when children wanted to be allocated specific ratios of CPU
+cycles and the number of internal threads fluctuated - the ratios
+constantly changed as the number of competing entities fluctuated.
+There also were other issues.  The mapping from nice level to weight
+wasn't obvious or universal, and there were various other knobs which
+simply weren't available for threads.
+
+The io controller implicitly created a hidden leaf node for each
+cgroup to host the threads.  The hidden leaf had its own copies of all
+the knobs with ``leaf_`` prefixed.  While this allowed equivalent
+control over internal threads, it was with serious drawbacks.  It
+always added an extra layer of nesting which wouldn't be necessary
+otherwise, made the interface messy and significantly complicated the
+implementation.
+
+The memory controller didn't have a way to control what happened
+between internal tasks and child cgroups and the behavior was not
+clearly defined.  There were attempts to add ad-hoc behaviors and
+knobs to tailor the behavior to specific workloads which would have
+led to problems extremely difficult to resolve in the long term.
+
+Multiple controllers struggled with internal tasks and came up with
+different ways to deal with it; unfortunately, all the approaches were
+severely flawed and, furthermore, the widely different behaviors
+made cgroup as a whole highly inconsistent.
+
+This clearly is a problem which needs to be addressed from cgroup core
+in a uniform way.
+
+
+Other Interface Issues
+----------------------
+
+cgroup v1 grew without oversight and developed a large number of
+idiosyncrasies and inconsistencies.  One issue on the cgroup core side
+was how an empty cgroup was notified - a userland helper binary was
+forked and executed for each event.  The event delivery wasn't
+recursive or delegatable.  The limitations of the mechanism also led
+to in-kernel event delivery filtering mechanism further complicating
+the interface.
+
+Controller interfaces were problematic too.  An extreme example is
+controllers completely ignoring hierarchical organization and treating
+all cgroups as if they were all located directly under the root
+cgroup.  Some controllers exposed a large amount of inconsistent
+implementation details to userland.
+
+There also was no consistency across controllers.  When a new cgroup
+was created, some controllers defaulted to not imposing extra
+restrictions while others disallowed any resource usage until
+explicitly configured.  Configuration knobs for the same type of
+control used widely differing naming schemes and formats.  Statistics
+and information knobs were named arbitrarily and used different
+formats and units even in the same controller.
+
+cgroup v2 establishes common conventions where appropriate and updates
+controllers so that they expose minimal and consistent interfaces.
+
+
+Controller Issues and Remedies
+------------------------------
+
+Memory
+~~~~~~
+
+The original lower boundary, the soft limit, is defined as a limit
+that is per default unset.  As a result, the set of cgroups that
+global reclaim prefers is opt-in, rather than opt-out.  The costs for
+optimizing these mostly negative lookups are so high that the
+implementation, despite its enormous size, does not even provide the
+basic desirable behavior.  First off, the soft limit has no
+hierarchical meaning.  All configured groups are organized in a global
+rbtree and treated like equal peers, regardless where they are located
+in the hierarchy.  This makes subtree delegation impossible.  Second,
+the soft limit reclaim pass is so aggressive that it not just
+introduces high allocation latencies into the system, but also impacts
+system performance due to overreclaim, to the point where the feature
+becomes self-defeating.
+
+The memory.low boundary on the other hand is a top-down allocated
+reserve.  A cgroup enjoys reclaim protection when it and all its
+ancestors are below their low boundaries, which makes delegation of
+subtrees possible.  Secondly, new cgroups have no reserve per default
+and in the common case most cgroups are eligible for the preferred
+reclaim pass.  This allows the new low boundary to be efficiently
+implemented with just a minor addition to the generic reclaim code,
+without the need for out-of-band data structures and reclaim passes.
+Because the generic reclaim code considers all cgroups except for the
+ones running low in the preferred first reclaim pass, overreclaim of
+individual groups is eliminated as well, resulting in much better
+overall workload performance.
+
+The original high boundary, the hard limit, is defined as a strict
+limit that can not budge, even if the OOM killer has to be called.
+But this generally goes against the goal of making the most out of the
+available memory.  The memory consumption of workloads varies during
+runtime, and that requires users to overcommit.  But doing that with a
+strict upper limit requires either a fairly accurate prediction of the
+working set size or adding slack to the limit.  Since working set size
+estimation is hard and error prone, and getting it wrong results in
+OOM kills, most users tend to err on the side of a looser limit and
+end up wasting precious resources.
+
+The memory.high boundary on the other hand can be set much more
+conservatively.  When hit, it throttles allocations by forcing them
+into direct reclaim to work off the excess, but it never invokes the
+OOM killer.  As a result, a high boundary that is chosen too
+aggressively will not terminate the processes, but instead it will
+lead to gradual performance degradation.  The user can monitor this
+and make corrections until the minimal memory footprint that still
+gives acceptable performance is found.
+
+In extreme cases, with many concurrent allocations and a complete
+breakdown of reclaim progress within the group, the high boundary can
+be exceeded.  But even then it's mostly better to satisfy the
+allocation from the slack available in other groups or the rest of the
+system than killing the group.  Otherwise, memory.max is there to
+limit this type of spillover and ultimately contain buggy or even
+malicious applications.
+
+Setting the original memory.limit_in_bytes below the current usage was
+subject to a race condition, where concurrent charges could cause the
+limit setting to fail. memory.max on the other hand will first set the
+limit to prevent new charges, and then reclaim and OOM kill until the
+new limit is met - or the task writing to memory.max is killed.
+
+The combined memory+swap accounting and limiting is replaced by real
+control over swap space.
+
+The main argument for a combined memory+swap facility in the original
+cgroup design was that global or parental pressure would always be
+able to swap all anonymous memory of a child group, regardless of the
+child's own (possibly untrusted) configuration.  However, untrusted
+groups can sabotage swapping by other means - such as referencing its
+anonymous memory in a tight loop - and an admin can not assume full
+swappability when overcommitting untrusted jobs.
+
+For trusted jobs, on the other hand, a combined counter is not an
+intuitive userspace interface, and it flies in the face of the idea
+that cgroup controllers should account and limit specific physical
+resources.  Swap space is a resource like all others in the system,
+and that's why unified hierarchy allows distributing it separately.