[PATCH] Add HOWTO do kernel development document to the Documentation directory

Here's a document that describes the process and procedures of how to do Linux
kernel development.  It has gone through a number of rounds of review on the
linux-kernel mailing list, and contains contributions and help from Paolo
Ciarrocchi, Randy Dunlap, Gerrit Huizenga, Pat Mochel, Hanna Linder, Kay
Sievers, Vojtech Pavlik, Jan Kara, Josh Boyer, Kees Cook, Andrew Morton, Andi
Kleen, Vadim Lobanov, Jesper Juhl, Adrian Bunk, Keri Harris, Frans Pop, David
A. Wheeler, Junio Hamano, Michael Kerrisk, and Alex Shepard.

Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 618 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/HOWTO b/Documentation/HOWTO
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..6c9e746267da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/HOWTO
@@ -0,0 +1,618 @@
+HOWTO do Linux kernel development
+---------------------------------
+
+This is the be-all, end-all document on this topic.  It contains
+instructions on how to become a Linux kernel developer and how to learn
+to work with the Linux kernel development community.  It tries to not
+contain anything related to the technical aspects of kernel programming,
+but will help point you in the right direction for that.
+
+If anything in this document becomes out of date, please send in patches
+to the maintainer of this file, who is listed at the bottom of the
+document.
+
+
+Introduction
+------------
+
+So, you want to learn how to become a Linux kernel developer?  Or you
+have been told by your manager, "Go write a Linux driver for this
+device."  This document's goal is to teach you everything you need to
+know to achieve this by describing the process you need to go through,
+and hints on how to work with the community.  It will also try to
+explain some of the reasons why the community works like it does.
+
+The kernel is written mostly in C, with some architecture-dependent
+parts written in assembly. A good understanding of C is required for
+kernel development.  Assembly (any architecture) is not required unless
+you plan to do low-level development for that architecture.  Though they
+are not a good substitute for a solid C education and/or years of
+experience, the following books are good for, if anything, reference:
+ - "The C Programming Language" by Kernighan and Ritchie [Prentice Hall]
+ - "Practical C Programming" by Steve Oualline [O'Reilly]
+
+The kernel is written using GNU C and the GNU toolchain.  While it
+adheres to the ISO C89 standard, it uses a number of extensions that are
+not featured in the standard.  The kernel is a freestanding C
+environment, with no reliance on the standard C library, so some
+portions of the C standard are not supported.  Arbitrary long long
+divisions and floating point are not allowed.  It can sometimes be
+difficult to understand the assumptions the kernel has on the toolchain
+and the extensions that it uses, and unfortunately there is no
+definitive reference for them.  Please check the gcc info pages (`info
+gcc`) for some information on them.
+
+Please remember that you are trying to learn how to work with the
+existing development community.  It is a diverse group of people, with
+high standards for coding, style and procedure.  These standards have
+been created over time based on what they have found to work best for
+such a large and geographically dispersed team.  Try to learn as much as
+possible about these standards ahead of time, as they are well
+documented; do not expect people to adapt to you or your company's way
+of doing things.
+
+
+Legal Issues
+------------
+
+The Linux kernel source code is released under the GPL.  Please see the
+file, COPYING, in the main directory of the source tree, for details on
+the license.  If you have further questions about the license, please
+contact a lawyer, and do not ask on the Linux kernel mailing list.  The
+people on the mailing lists are not lawyers, and you should not rely on
+their statements on legal matters.
+
+For common questions and answers about the GPL, please see:
+	http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html
+
+
+Documentation
+------------
+
+The Linux kernel source tree has a large range of documents that are
+invaluable for learning how to interact with the kernel community.  When
+new features are added to the kernel, it is recommended that new
+documentation files are also added which explain how to use the feature.
+When a kernel change causes the interface that the kernel exposes to
+userspace to change, it is recommended that you send the information or
+a patch to the manual pages explaining the change to the manual pages
+maintainer at mtk-manpages@gmx.net.
+
+Here is a list of files that are in the kernel source tree that are
+required reading:
+  README
+    This file gives a short background on the Linux kernel and describes
+    what is necessary to do to configure and build the kernel.  People
+    who are new to the kernel should start here.
+
+  Documentation/Changes
+    This file gives a list of the minimum levels of various software
+    packages that are necessary to build and run the kernel
+    successfully.
+
+  Documentation/CodingStyle
+    This describes the Linux kernel coding style, and some of the
+    rationale behind it. All new code is expected to follow the
+    guidelines in this document. Most maintainers will only accept
+    patches if these rules are followed, and many people will only
+    review code if it is in the proper style.
+
+  Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+  Documentation/SubmittingDrivers
+    These files describe in explicit detail how to successfully create
+    and send a patch, including (but not limited to):
+       - Email contents
+       - Email format
+       - Who to send it to
+    Following these rules will not guarantee success (as all patches are
+    subject to scrutiny for content and style), but not following them
+    will almost always prevent it.
+
+    Other excellent descriptions of how to create patches properly are:
+	"The Perfect Patch"
+		http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt
+	"Linux kernel patch submission format"
+		http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
+
+  Documentation/stable_api_nonsense.txt
+    This file describes the rationale behind the conscious decision to
+    not have a stable API within the kernel, including things like:
+      - Subsystem shim-layers (for compatibility?)
+      - Driver portability between Operating Systems.
+      - Mitigating rapid change within the kernel source tree (or
+	preventing rapid change)
+    This document is crucial for understanding the Linux development
+    philosophy and is very important for people moving to Linux from
+    development on other Operating Systems.
+
+  Documentation/SecurityBugs
+    If you feel you have found a security problem in the Linux kernel,
+    please follow the steps in this document to help notify the kernel
+    developers, and help solve the issue.
+
+  Documentation/ManagementStyle
+    This document describes how Linux kernel maintainers operate and the
+    shared ethos behind their methodologies.  This is important reading
+    for anyone new to kernel development (or anyone simply curious about
+    it), as it resolves a lot of common misconceptions and confusion
+    about the unique behavior of kernel maintainers.
+
+  Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
+    This file describes the rules on how the stable kernel releases
+    happen, and what to do if you want to get a change into one of these
+    releases.
+
+  Documentation/kernel-docs.txt
+    A list of external documentation that pertains to kernel
+    development.  Please consult this list if you do not find what you
+    are looking for within the in-kernel documentation.
+
+  Documentation/applying-patches.txt
+    A good introduction describing exactly what a patch is and how to
+    apply it to the different development branches of the kernel.
+
+The kernel also has a large number of documents that can be
+automatically generated from the source code itself.  This includes a
+full description of the in-kernel API, and rules on how to handle
+locking properly.  The documents will be created in the
+Documentation/DocBook/ directory and can be generated as PDF,
+Postscript, HTML, and man pages by running:
+	make pdfdocs
+	make psdocs
+	make htmldocs
+	make mandocs
+respectively from the main kernel source directory.
+
+
+Becoming A Kernel Developer
+---------------------------
+
+If you do not know anything about Linux kernel development, you should
+look at the Linux KernelNewbies project:
+	http://kernelnewbies.org
+It consists of a helpful mailing list where you can ask almost any type
+of basic kernel development question (make sure to search the archives
+first, before asking something that has already been answered in the
+past.)  It also has an IRC channel that you can use to ask questions in
+real-time, and a lot of helpful documentation that is useful for
+learning about Linux kernel development.
+
+The website has basic information about code organization, subsystems,
+and current projects (both in-tree and out-of-tree). It also describes
+some basic logistical information, like how to compile a kernel and
+apply a patch.
+
+If you do not know where you want to start, but you want to look for
+some task to start doing to join into the kernel development community,
+go to the Linux Kernel Janitor's project:
+	http://janitor.kernelnewbies.org/
+It is a great place to start.  It describes a list of relatively simple
+problems that need to be cleaned up and fixed within the Linux kernel
+source tree.  Working with the developers in charge of this project, you
+will learn the basics of getting your patch into the Linux kernel tree,
+and possibly be pointed in the direction of what to go work on next, if
+you do not already have an idea.
+
+If you already have a chunk of code that you want to put into the kernel
+tree, but need some help getting it in the proper form, the
+kernel-mentors project was created to help you out with this.  It is a
+mailing list, and can be found at:
+	http://selenic.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-mentors
+
+Before making any actual modifications to the Linux kernel code, it is
+imperative to understand how the code in question works.  For this
+purpose, nothing is better than reading through it directly (most tricky
+bits are commented well), perhaps even with the help of specialized
+tools.  One such tool that is particularly recommended is the Linux
+Cross-Reference project, which is able to present source code in a
+self-referential, indexed webpage format. An excellent up-to-date
+repository of the kernel code may be found at:
+	http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/
+
+
+The development process
+-----------------------
+
+Linux kernel development process currently consists of a few different
+main kernel "branches" and lots of different subsystem-specific kernel
+branches.  These different branches are:
+  - main 2.6.x kernel tree
+  - 2.6.x.y -stable kernel tree
+  - 2.6.x -git kernel patches
+  - 2.6.x -mm kernel patches
+  - subsystem specific kernel trees and patches
+
+2.6.x kernel tree
+-----------------
+2.6.x kernels are maintained by Linus Torvalds, and can be found on
+kernel.org in the pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/ directory.  Its development
+process is as follows:
+  - As soon as a new kernel is released a two weeks window is open,
+    during this period of time maintainers can submit big diffs to
+    Linus, usually the patches that have already been included in the
+    -mm kernel for a few weeks.  The preferred way to submit big changes
+    is using git (the kernel's source management tool, more information
+    can be found at http://git.or.cz/) but plain patches are also just
+    fine.
+  - After two weeks a -rc1 kernel is released it is now possible to push
+    only patches that do not include new features that could affect the
+    stability of the whole kernel.  Please note that a whole new driver
+    (or filesystem) might be accepted after -rc1 because there is no
+    risk of causing regressions with such a change as long as the change
+    is self-contained and does not affect areas outside of the code that
+    is being added.  git can be used to send patches to Linus after -rc1
+    is released, but the patches need to also be sent to a public
+    mailing list for review.
+  - A new -rc is released whenever Linus deems the current git tree to
+    be in a reasonably sane state adequate for testing.  The goal is to
+    release a new -rc kernel every week.
+  - Process continues until the kernel is considered "ready", the
+    process should last around 6 weeks.
+
+It is worth mentioning what Andrew Morton wrote on the linux-kernel
+mailing list about kernel releases:
+	"Nobody knows when a kernel will be released, because it's
+	released according to perceived bug status, not according to a
+	preconceived timeline."
+
+2.6.x.y -stable kernel tree
+---------------------------
+Kernels with 4 digit versions are -stable kernels. They contain
+relatively small and critical fixes for security problems or significant
+regressions discovered in a given 2.6.x kernel.
+
+This is the recommended branch for users who want the most recent stable
+kernel and are not interested in helping test development/experimental
+versions.
+
+If no 2.6.x.y kernel is available, then the highest numbered 2.6.x
+kernel is the current stable kernel.
+
+2.6.x.y are maintained by the "stable" team <stable@kernel.org>, and are
+released almost every other week.
+
+The file Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt in the kernel tree
+documents what kinds of changes are acceptable for the -stable tree, and
+how the release process works.
+
+2.6.x -git patches
+------------------
+These are daily snapshots of Linus' kernel tree which are managed in a
+git repository (hence the name.) These patches are usually released
+daily and represent the current state of Linus' tree.  They are more
+experimental than -rc kernels since they are generated automatically
+without even a cursory glance to see if they are sane.
+
+2.6.x -mm kernel patches
+------------------------
+These are experimental kernel patches released by Andrew Morton.  Andrew
+takes all of the different subsystem kernel trees and patches and mushes
+them together, along with a lot of patches that have been plucked from
+the linux-kernel mailing list.  This tree serves as a proving ground for
+new features and patches.  Once a patch has proved its worth in -mm for
+a while Andrew or the subsystem maintainer pushes it on to Linus for
+inclusion in mainline.
+
+It is heavily encouraged that all new patches get tested in the -mm tree
+before they are sent to Linus for inclusion in the main kernel tree.
+
+These kernels are not appropriate for use on systems that are supposed
+to be stable and they are more risky to run than any of the other
+branches.
+
+If you wish to help out with the kernel development process, please test
+and use these kernel releases and provide feedback to the linux-kernel
+mailing list if you have any problems, and if everything works properly.
+
+In addition to all the other experimental patches, these kernels usually
+also contain any changes in the mainline -git kernels available at the
+time of release.
+
+The -mm kernels are not released on a fixed schedule, but usually a few
+-mm kernels are released in between each -rc kernel (1 to 3 is common).
+
+Subsystem Specific kernel trees and patches
+-------------------------------------------
+A number of the different kernel subsystem developers expose their
+development trees so that others can see what is happening in the
+different areas of the kernel.  These trees are pulled into the -mm
+kernel releases as described above.
+
+Here is a list of some of the different kernel trees available:
+  git trees:
+    - Kbuild development tree, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sam/kbuild.git
+
+    - ACPI development tree, Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git
+
+    - Block development tree, Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-2.6-block.git
+
+    - DRM development tree, Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/airlied/drm-2.6.git
+
+    - ia64 development tree, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/aegl/linux-2.6.git
+
+    - ieee1394 development tree, Jody McIntyre <scjody@modernduck.com>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/scjody/ieee1394.git
+
+    - infiniband, Roland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/roland/infiniband.git
+
+    - libata, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git
+
+    - network drivers, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/netdev-2.6.git
+
+    - pcmcia, Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/brodo/pcmcia-2.6.git
+
+    - SCSI, James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
+	kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi-misc-2.6.git
+
+  Other git kernel trees can be found listed at http://kernel.org/git
+
+  quilt trees:
+    - USB, PCI, Driver Core, and I2C, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
+	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/gregkh/gregkh-2.6/
+
+
+Bug Reporting
+-------------
+
+bugzilla.kernel.org is where the Linux kernel developers track kernel
+bugs.  Users are encouraged to report all bugs that they find in this
+tool.  For details on how to use the kernel bugzilla, please see:
+	http://test.kernel.org/bugzilla/faq.html
+
+The file REPORTING-BUGS in the main kernel source directory has a good
+template for how to report a possible kernel bug, and details what kind
+of information is needed by the kernel developers to help track down the
+problem.
+
+
+Mailing lists
+-------------
+
+As some of the above documents describe, the majority of the core kernel
+developers participate on the Linux Kernel Mailing list.  Details on how
+to subscribe and unsubscribe from the list can be found at:
+	http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-kernel
+There are archives of the mailing list on the web in many different
+places.  Use a search engine to find these archives.  For example:
+	http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel
+It is highly recommended that you search the archives about the topic
+you want to bring up, before you post it to the list. A lot of things
+already discussed in detail are only recorded at the mailing list
+archives.
+
+Most of the individual kernel subsystems also have their own separate
+mailing list where they do their development efforts.  See the
+MAINTAINERS file for a list of what these lists are for the different
+groups.
+
+Many of the lists are hosted on kernel.org. Information on them can be
+found at:
+	http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html
+
+Please remember to follow good behavioral habits when using the lists.
+Though a bit cheesy, the following URL has some simple guidelines for
+interacting with the list (or any list):
+	http://www.albion.com/netiquette/
+
+If multiple people respond to your mail, the CC: list of recipients may
+get pretty large. Don't remove anybody from the CC: list without a good
+reason, or don't reply only to the list address. Get used to receiving the
+mail twice, one from the sender and the one from the list, and don't try
+to tune that by adding fancy mail-headers, people will not like it.
+
+Remember to keep the context and the attribution of your replies intact,
+keep the "John Kernelhacker wrote ...:" lines at the top of your reply, and
+add your statements between the individual quoted sections instead of
+writing at the top of the mail.
+
+If you add patches to your mail, make sure they are plain readable text
+as stated in Documentation/SubmittingPatches. Kernel developers don't
+want to deal with attachments or compressed patches; they may want
+to comment on individual lines of your patch, which works only that way.
+Make sure you use a mail program that does not mangle spaces and tab
+characters. A good first test is to send the mail to yourself and try
+to apply your own patch by yourself. If that doesn't work, get your
+mail program fixed or change it until it works.
+
+Above all, please remember to show respect to other subscribers.
+
+
+Working with the community
+--------------------------
+
+The goal of the kernel community is to provide the best possible kernel
+there is.  When you submit a patch for acceptance, it will be reviewed
+on its technical merits and those alone.  So, what should you be
+expecting?
+  - criticism
+  - comments
+  - requests for change
+  - requests for justification
+  - silence
+
+Remember, this is part of getting your patch into the kernel.  You have
+to be able to take criticism and comments about your patches, evaluate
+them at a technical level and either rework your patches or provide
+clear and concise reasoning as to why those changes should not be made.
+If there are no responses to your posting, wait a few days and try
+again, sometimes things get lost in the huge volume.
+
+What should you not do?
+  - expect your patch to be accepted without question
+  - become defensive
+  - ignore comments
+  - resubmit the patch without making any of the requested changes
+
+In a community that is looking for the best technical solution possible,
+there will always be differing opinions on how beneficial a patch is.
+You have to be cooperative, and willing to adapt your idea to fit within
+the kernel.  Or at least be willing to prove your idea is worth it.
+Remember, being wrong is acceptable as long as you are willing to work
+toward a solution that is right.
+
+It is normal that the answers to your first patch might simply be a list
+of a dozen things you should correct.  This does _not_ imply that your
+patch will not be accepted, and it is _not_ meant against you
+personally.  Simply correct all issues raised against your patch and
+resend it.
+
+
+Differences between the kernel community and corporate structures
+-----------------------------------------------------------------
+
+The kernel community works differently than most traditional corporate
+development environments.  Here are a list of things that you can try to
+do to try to avoid problems:
+  Good things to say regarding your proposed changes:
+    - "This solves multiple problems."
+    - "This deletes 2000 lines of code."
+    - "Here is a patch that explains what I am trying to describe."
+    - "I tested it on 5 different architectures..."
+    - "Here is a series of small patches that..."
+    - "This increases performance on typical machines..."
+
+  Bad things you should avoid saying:
+    - "We did it this way in AIX/ptx/Solaris, so therefore it must be
+      good..."
+    - "I've being doing this for 20 years, so..."
+    - "This is required for my company to make money"
+    - "This is for our Enterprise product line."
+    - "Here is my 1000 page design document that describes my idea"
+    - "I've been working on this for 6 months..."
+    - "Here's a 5000 line patch that..."
+    - "I rewrote all of the current mess, and here it is..."
+    - "I have a deadline, and this patch needs to be applied now."
+
+Another way the kernel community is different than most traditional
+software engineering work environments is the faceless nature of
+interaction.  One benefit of using email and irc as the primary forms of
+communication is the lack of discrimination based on gender or race.
+The Linux kernel work environment is accepting of women and minorities
+because all you are is an email address.  The international aspect also
+helps to level the playing field because you can't guess gender based on
+a person's name. A man may be named Andrea and a woman may be named Pat.
+Most women who have worked in the Linux kernel and have expressed an
+opinion have had positive experiences.
+
+The language barrier can cause problems for some people who are not
+comfortable with English.  A good grasp of the language can be needed in
+order to get ideas across properly on mailing lists, so it is
+recommended that you check your emails to make sure they make sense in
+English before sending them.
+
+
+Break up your changes
+---------------------
+
+The Linux kernel community does not gladly accept large chunks of code
+dropped on it all at once.  The changes need to be properly introduced,
+discussed, and broken up into tiny, individual portions.  This is almost
+the exact opposite of what companies are used to doing.  Your proposal
+should also be introduced very early in the development process, so that
+you can receive feedback on what you are doing.  It also lets the
+community feel that you are working with them, and not simply using them
+as a dumping ground for your feature.  However, don't send 50 emails at
+one time to a mailing list, your patch series should be smaller than
+that almost all of the time.
+
+The reasons for breaking things up are the following:
+
+1) Small patches increase the likelihood that your patches will be
+   applied, since they don't take much time or effort to verify for
+   correctness.  A 5 line patch can be applied by a maintainer with
+   barely a second glance. However, a 500 line patch may take hours to
+   review for correctness (the time it takes is exponentially
+   proportional to the size of the patch, or something).
+
+   Small patches also make it very easy to debug when something goes
+   wrong.  It's much easier to back out patches one by one than it is
+   to dissect a very large patch after it's been applied (and broken
+   something).
+
+2) It's important not only to send small patches, but also to rewrite
+   and simplify (or simply re-order) patches before submitting them.
+
+Here is an analogy from kernel developer Al Viro:
+	"Think of a teacher grading homework from a math student.  The
+	teacher does not want to see the student's trials and errors
+	before they came up with the solution. They want to see the
+	cleanest, most elegant answer.  A good student knows this, and
+	would never submit her intermediate work before the final
+	solution."
+
+	The same is true of kernel development. The maintainers and
+	reviewers do not want to see the thought process behind the
+	solution to the problem one is solving. They want to see a
+	simple and elegant solution."
+
+It may be challenging to keep the balance between presenting an elegant
+solution and working together with the community and discussing your
+unfinished work. Therefore it is good to get early in the process to
+get feedback to improve your work, but also keep your changes in small
+chunks that they may get already accepted, even when your whole task is
+not ready for inclusion now.
+
+Also realize that it is not acceptable to send patches for inclusion
+that are unfinished and will be "fixed up later."
+
+
+Justify your change
+-------------------
+
+Along with breaking up your patches, it is very important for you to let
+the Linux community know why they should add this change.  New features
+must be justified as being needed and useful.
+
+
+Document your change
+--------------------
+
+When sending in your patches, pay special attention to what you say in
+the text in your email.  This information will become the ChangeLog
+information for the patch, and will be preserved for everyone to see for
+all time.  It should describe the patch completely, containing:
+  - why the change is necessary
+  - the overall design approach in the patch
+  - implementation details
+  - testing results
+
+For more details on what this should all look like, please see the
+ChangeLog section of the document:
+  "The Perfect Patch"
+      http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt
+
+
+
+
+All of these things are sometimes very hard to do. It can take years to
+perfect these practices (if at all). It's a continuous process of
+improvement that requires a lot of patience and determination. But
+don't give up, it's possible. Many have done it before, and each had to
+start exactly where you are now.
+
+
+
+
+----------
+Thanks to Paolo Ciarrocchi who allowed the "Development Process" section
+to be based on text he had written, and to Randy Dunlap and Gerrit
+Huizenga for some of the list of things you should and should not say.
+Also thanks to Pat Mochel, Hanna Linder, Randy Dunlap, Kay Sievers,
+Vojtech Pavlik, Jan Kara, Josh Boyer, Kees Cook, Andrew Morton, Andi
+Kleen, Vadim Lobanov, Jesper Juhl, Adrian Bunk, Keri Harris, Frans Pop,
+David A. Wheeler, Junio Hamano, Michael Kerrisk, and Alex Shepard for
+their review, comments, and contributions.  Without their help, this
+document would not have been possible.
+
+
+
+Maintainer: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>