diff options
| author | Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com> | 2014-10-30 13:39:04 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com> | 2014-10-31 09:44:35 +0100 |
| commit | 21e88620aa21b48d4f62d29275e3e2944a5ea2b5 (patch) | |
| tree | 4ea16fa234bc54398da1518c16028189176d4995 | |
| parent | d34d4d8af8d24afe4e16128e4e7f5c5967c89027 (diff) | |
| download | linux-21e88620aa21b48d4f62d29275e3e2944a5ea2b5.tar.bz2 | |
drm/vmwgfx: fix lock breakage
After:
commit d059f652e73c35678d28d4cd09ab2cec89696af9
Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
AuthorDate: Fri Jul 25 18:07:40 2014 +0200
drm: Handle legacy per-crtc locking with full acquire ctx
drm_mode_cursor_common() was switched to use drm_modeset_(un)lock_crtc()
which uses full aquire ctx. So dropping/reaquiring the lock via
drm_modeset_(un)lock() directly isn't the right thing to do, as lockdep
kindly points out.
The 'FIXME's about sorting out whether vmwgfx *really* needs to lock-all
for cursor updates still apply.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Bornecrantz <jakob@vmware.com>
Tested-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c index d2bc2b03d4c6..8fc1e38bbe44 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv, * can do this since the caller in the drm core doesn't check anything * which is protected by any looks. */ - drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + drm_modeset_unlock_crtc(crtc); drm_modeset_lock_all(dev_priv->dev); /* A lot of the code assumes this */ @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv, ret = 0; out: drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev_priv->dev); - drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, NULL); + drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc); return ret; } @@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_move(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y) * can do this since the caller in the drm core doesn't check anything * which is protected by any looks. */ - drm_modeset_unlock(&crtc->mutex); + drm_modeset_unlock_crtc(crtc); drm_modeset_lock_all(dev_priv->dev); vmw_cursor_update_position(dev_priv, shown, @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_move(struct drm_crtc *crtc, int x, int y) du->cursor_y + du->hotspot_y); drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev_priv->dev); - drm_modeset_lock(&crtc->mutex, NULL); + drm_modeset_lock_crtc(crtc); return 0; } |