diff options
| author | Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> | 2016-06-25 19:19:28 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> | 2016-06-28 16:55:34 -0400 |
| commit | e547f2628327fec6afd2e03b46f113f614cca05b (patch) | |
| tree | 9daba7ada0d5a10f7fdf1828f38954d86253dcc1 | |
| parent | d20cb71dbf3487f24549ede1a8e2d67579b4632e (diff) | |
| download | linux-e547f2628327fec6afd2e03b46f113f614cca05b.tar.bz2 | |
NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug
Olga Kornievskaia reports that the following test fails to trigger
an OPEN_DOWNGRADE on the wire, and only triggers the final CLOSE.
fd0 = open(foo, RDRW) -- should be open on the wire for "both"
fd1 = open(foo, RDONLY) -- should be open on the wire for "read"
close(fd0) -- should trigger an open_downgrade
read(fd1)
close(fd1)
The issue is that we're missing a check for whether or not the current
state transitioned from an O_RDWR state as opposed to having transitioned
from a combination of O_RDONLY and O_WRONLY.
Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
Fixes: cd9288ffaea4 ("NFSv4: Fix another bug in the close/open_downgrade code")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 2.6.33+
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c index 406dd3eb68e2..ff416d0e24bc 100644 --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c @@ -2882,12 +2882,11 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rpc_task *task, void *data) call_close |= is_wronly; else if (is_wronly) calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE; + if (calldata->arg.fmode != (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE)) + call_close |= is_rdwr; } else if (is_rdwr) calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE; - if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0) - call_close |= is_rdwr; - if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state)) call_close = 0; spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock); |