diff options
| author | Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org> | 2017-09-21 11:04:02 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> | 2017-10-03 08:40:57 -0600 |
| commit | 894df937e06a56ed6f054a75a416aff84147c5a2 (patch) | |
| tree | 2ef0faa82b5c62b30ce98136e8e9efe506a4d054 | |
| parent | 3e2bdd6dff239afd8386e8758eee69ad61e5a3d6 (diff) | |
| download | linux-894df937e06a56ed6f054a75a416aff84147c5a2.tar.bz2 | |
block, bfq: let early-merged queues be weight-raised on split too
A just-created bfq_queue, say Q, may happen to be merged with another
bfq_queue on the very first invocation of the function
__bfq_insert_request. In such a case, even if Q would clearly deserve
interactive weight raising (as it has just been created), the function
bfq_add_request does not make it to be invoked for Q, and thus to
activate weight raising for Q. As a consequence, when the state of Q
is saved for a possible future restore, after a split of Q from the
other bfq_queue(s), such a state happens to be (unjustly)
non-weight-raised. Then the bfq_queue will not enjoy any weight
raising on the split, even if should still be in an interactive
weight-raising period when the split occurs.
This commit solves this problem as follows, for a just-created
bfq_queue that is being early-merged: it stores directly, in the saved
state of the bfq_queue, the weight-raising state that would have been
assigned to the bfq_queue if not early-merged.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Angelo Ruocco <angeloruocco90@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Mirko Montanari <mirkomontanari91@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>
Tested-by: Lee Tibbert <lee.tibbert@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
| -rw-r--r-- | block/bfq-iosched.c | 28 |
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c index 33b63bc4a64b..115747fe43c8 100644 --- a/block/bfq-iosched.c +++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c @@ -2061,10 +2061,27 @@ static void bfq_bfqq_save_state(struct bfq_queue *bfqq) bic->saved_IO_bound = bfq_bfqq_IO_bound(bfqq); bic->saved_in_large_burst = bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq); bic->was_in_burst_list = !hlist_unhashed(&bfqq->burst_list_node); - bic->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff; - bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt; - bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish = bfqq->last_wr_start_finish; - bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfqq->wr_cur_max_time; + if (unlikely(bfq_bfqq_just_created(bfqq) && + !bfq_bfqq_in_large_burst(bfqq))) { + /* + * bfqq being merged right after being created: bfqq + * would have deserved interactive weight raising, but + * did not make it to be set in a weight-raised state, + * because of this early merge. Store directly the + * weight-raising state that would have been assigned + * to bfqq, so that to avoid that bfqq unjustly fails + * to enjoy weight raising if split soon. + */ + bic->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->bfqd->bfq_wr_coeff; + bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfq_wr_duration(bfqq->bfqd); + bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish = jiffies; + } else { + bic->saved_wr_coeff = bfqq->wr_coeff; + bic->saved_wr_start_at_switch_to_srt = + bfqq->wr_start_at_switch_to_srt; + bic->saved_last_wr_start_finish = bfqq->last_wr_start_finish; + bic->saved_wr_cur_max_time = bfqq->wr_cur_max_time; + } } static void @@ -4150,7 +4167,6 @@ static void __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) new_bfqq->allocated++; bfqq->allocated--; new_bfqq->ref++; - bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); /* * If the bic associated with the process * issuing this request still points to bfqq @@ -4162,6 +4178,8 @@ static void __bfq_insert_request(struct bfq_data *bfqd, struct request *rq) if (bic_to_bfqq(RQ_BIC(rq), 1) == bfqq) bfq_merge_bfqqs(bfqd, RQ_BIC(rq), bfqq, new_bfqq); + + bfq_clear_bfqq_just_created(bfqq); /* * rq is about to be enqueued into new_bfqq, * release rq reference on bfqq |