diff options
author | Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com> | 2019-09-23 02:02:42 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org> | 2019-09-30 17:35:01 -0600 |
commit | 73ba5aaf93b41e641a250530f48274d783dd56fc (patch) | |
tree | 95e248422ac13533cb7ab57276ab840b03b9f739 | |
parent | e4aea8f8532b55f966d828efcf720f8aeb203e13 (diff) | |
download | linux-73ba5aaf93b41e641a250530f48274d783dd56fc.tar.bz2 |
kunit: test: add tests for KUnit managed resources
Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources
(struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up
at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed
resources.
Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy <akndr41@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
-rw-r--r-- | lib/kunit/test-test.c | 228 |
1 files changed, 228 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/kunit/test-test.c b/lib/kunit/test-test.c index e0ab4bd546ea..5ebe059d16e2 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test-test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test-test.c @@ -101,3 +101,231 @@ static struct kunit_suite kunit_try_catch_test_suite = { .test_cases = kunit_try_catch_test_cases, }; kunit_test_suite(kunit_try_catch_test_suite); + +/* + * Context for testing test managed resources + * is_resource_initialized is used to test arbitrary resources + */ +struct kunit_test_resource_context { + struct kunit test; + bool is_resource_initialized; + int allocate_order[2]; + int free_order[2]; +}; + +static int fake_resource_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context; + + res->allocation = &ctx->is_resource_initialized; + ctx->is_resource_initialized = true; + return 0; +} + +static void fake_resource_free(struct kunit_resource *res) +{ + bool *is_resource_initialized = res->allocation; + + *is_resource_initialized = false; +} + +static void kunit_resource_test_init_resources(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv; + + kunit_init_test(&ctx->test, "testing_test_init_test"); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources)); +} + +static void kunit_resource_test_alloc_resource(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct kunit_resource *res; + kunit_resource_free_t free = fake_resource_free; + + res = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test, + fake_resource_init, + fake_resource_free, + GFP_KERNEL, + ctx); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, res); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, + &ctx->is_resource_initialized, + (bool *) res->allocation); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_is_last(&res->node, &ctx->test.resources)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, free, res->free); +} + +static void kunit_resource_test_destroy_resource(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct kunit_resource *res = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource( + &ctx->test, + fake_resource_init, + fake_resource_free, + GFP_KERNEL, + ctx); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, + kunit_resource_destroy(&ctx->test, + kunit_resource_instance_match, + res->free, + res->allocation)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, ctx->is_resource_initialized); + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources)); +} + +static void kunit_resource_test_cleanup_resources(struct kunit *test) +{ + int i; + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv; + struct kunit_resource *resources[5]; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(resources); i++) { + resources[i] = kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test, + fake_resource_init, + fake_resource_free, + GFP_KERNEL, + ctx); + } + + kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty(&ctx->test.resources)); +} + +static void kunit_resource_test_mark_order(int order_array[], + size_t order_size, + int key) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < order_size && order_array[i]; i++) + ; + + order_array[i] = key; +} + +#define KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, order_field, key) \ + kunit_resource_test_mark_order(ctx->order_field, \ + ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->order_field), \ + key) + +static int fake_resource_2_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context; + + KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, allocate_order, 2); + + res->allocation = ctx; + + return 0; +} + +static void fake_resource_2_free(struct kunit_resource *res) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = res->allocation; + + KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, free_order, 2); +} + +static int fake_resource_1_init(struct kunit_resource *res, void *context) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = context; + + kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test, + fake_resource_2_init, + fake_resource_2_free, + GFP_KERNEL, + ctx); + + KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, allocate_order, 1); + + res->allocation = ctx; + + return 0; +} + +static void fake_resource_1_free(struct kunit_resource *res) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = res->allocation; + + KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER(ctx, free_order, 1); +} + +/* + * TODO(brendanhiggins@google.com): replace the arrays that keep track of the + * order of allocation and freeing with strict mocks using the IN_SEQUENCE macro + * to assert allocation and freeing order when the feature becomes available. + */ +static void kunit_resource_test_proper_free_ordering(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv; + + /* fake_resource_1 allocates a fake_resource_2 in its init. */ + kunit_alloc_and_get_resource(&ctx->test, + fake_resource_1_init, + fake_resource_1_free, + GFP_KERNEL, + ctx); + + /* + * Since fake_resource_2_init calls KUNIT_RESOURCE_TEST_MARK_ORDER + * before returning to fake_resource_1_init, it should be the first to + * put its key in the allocate_order array. + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->allocate_order[0], 2); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->allocate_order[1], 1); + + kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test); + + /* + * Because fake_resource_2 finishes allocation before fake_resource_1, + * fake_resource_1 should be freed first since it could depend on + * fake_resource_2. + */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[0], 1); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ctx->free_order[1], 2); +} + +static int kunit_resource_test_init(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = + kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); + + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, ctx); + + test->priv = ctx; + + kunit_init_test(&ctx->test, "test_test_context"); + + return 0; +} + +static void kunit_resource_test_exit(struct kunit *test) +{ + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx = test->priv; + + kunit_cleanup(&ctx->test); + kfree(ctx); +} + +static struct kunit_case kunit_resource_test_cases[] = { + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_init_resources), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_alloc_resource), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_destroy_resource), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_cleanup_resources), + KUNIT_CASE(kunit_resource_test_proper_free_ordering), + {} +}; + +static struct kunit_suite kunit_resource_test_suite = { + .name = "kunit-resource-test", + .init = kunit_resource_test_init, + .exit = kunit_resource_test_exit, + .test_cases = kunit_resource_test_cases, +}; +kunit_test_suite(kunit_resource_test_suite); |