summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>2018-01-31 16:19:52 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2018-01-31 17:18:39 -0800
commit69d763fc6d3aee787a3e8c8c35092b4f4960fa5d (patch)
treed4ef12c68e16fb5ef0febc788d50b6c0e51a2bb6
parent284cd241a18ee6d999296f8ff3104eb6d2fc898f (diff)
downloadlinux-69d763fc6d3aee787a3e8c8c35092b4f4960fa5d.tar.bz2
mm: pin address_space before dereferencing it while isolating an LRU page
Minchan Kim asked the following question -- what locks protects address_space destroying when race happens between inode trauncation and __isolate_lru_page? Jan Kara clarified by describing the race as follows CPU1 CPU2 truncate(inode) __isolate_lru_page() ... truncate_inode_page(mapping, page); delete_from_page_cache(page) spin_lock_irqsave(&mapping->tree_lock, flags); __delete_from_page_cache(page, NULL) page_cache_tree_delete(..) ... mapping = page_mapping(page); page->mapping = NULL; ... spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mapping->tree_lock, flags); page_cache_free_page(mapping, page) put_page(page) if (put_page_testzero(page)) -> false - inode now has no pages and can be freed including embedded address_space if (mapping && !mapping->a_ops->migratepage) - we've dereferenced mapping which is potentially already free. The race is theoretically possible but unlikely. Before the delete_from_page_cache, truncate_cleanup_page is called so the page is likely to be !PageDirty or PageWriteback which gets skipped by the only caller that checks the mappping in __isolate_lru_page. Even if the race occurs, a substantial amount of work has to happen during a tiny window with no preemption but it could potentially be done using a virtual machine to artifically slow one CPU or halt it during the critical window. This patch should eliminate the race with truncation by try-locking the page before derefencing mapping and aborting if the lock was not acquired. There was a suggestion from Huang Ying to use RCU as a side-effect to prevent mapping being freed. However, I do not like the solution as it's an unconventional means of preserving a mapping and it's not a context where rcu_read_lock is obviously protecting rcu data. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180104102512.2qos3h5vqzeisrek@techsingularity.net Fixes: c82449352854 ("mm: compaction: make isolate_lru_page() filter-aware again") Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-rw-r--r--mm/vmscan.c14
1 files changed, 12 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 1a33c8e1e758..fdd3fc6be862 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -1415,14 +1415,24 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode)
if (PageDirty(page)) {
struct address_space *mapping;
+ bool migrate_dirty;
/*
* Only pages without mappings or that have a
* ->migratepage callback are possible to migrate
- * without blocking
+ * without blocking. However, we can be racing with
+ * truncation so it's necessary to lock the page
+ * to stabilise the mapping as truncation holds
+ * the page lock until after the page is removed
+ * from the page cache.
*/
+ if (!trylock_page(page))
+ return ret;
+
mapping = page_mapping(page);
- if (mapping && !mapping->a_ops->migratepage)
+ migrate_dirty = mapping && mapping->a_ops->migratepage;
+ unlock_page(page);
+ if (!migrate_dirty)
return ret;
}
}