diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-04-07 10:01:45 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-04-07 10:01:45 -0700 |
commit | 7ab661856bd7b30ef9e3b516330df7b5a5ea0c2c (patch) | |
tree | 99d162fa46ce2b8ede986d8dab33c53fe680b838 | |
parent | 50bdd7a0c99afc78e8dd9403c10b947efc4af4f5 (diff) | |
parent | dc752d54fd3a69c882d24133810edeb22dda2d0d (diff) | |
download | linux-7ab661856bd7b30ef9e3b516330df7b5a5ea0c2c.tar.bz2 |
Merge tag 'acpi-4.11-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Pull ACPI fix from Rafael Wysocki:
"This fixes a core device enumeration code change made in 4.10, in
order to address a reported issue, that went too far.
Specifics:
- Refine the check for the existence of _HID in find_child_checks()
so that it doesn't trigger for device objects with device IDs made
up by the kernel (Rafael Wysocki)"
* tag 'acpi-4.11-rc6' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
ACPI / scan: Prefer devices without _HID for _ADR matching
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/acpi/glue.c | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/glue.c b/drivers/acpi/glue.c index fb19e1cdb641..edc8663b5db3 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/glue.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/glue.c @@ -99,13 +99,13 @@ static int find_child_checks(struct acpi_device *adev, bool check_children) return -ENODEV; /* - * If the device has a _HID (or _CID) returning a valid ACPI/PNP - * device ID, it is better to make it look less attractive here, so that - * the other device with the same _ADR value (that may not have a valid - * device ID) can be matched going forward. [This means a second spec - * violation in a row, so whatever we do here is best effort anyway.] + * If the device has a _HID returning a valid ACPI/PNP device ID, it is + * better to make it look less attractive here, so that the other device + * with the same _ADR value (that may not have a valid device ID) can be + * matched going forward. [This means a second spec violation in a row, + * so whatever we do here is best effort anyway.] */ - return sta_present && list_empty(&adev->pnp.ids) ? + return sta_present && !adev->pnp.type.platform_id ? FIND_CHILD_MAX_SCORE : FIND_CHILD_MIN_SCORE; } |