diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-06-19 09:51:00 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2022-06-19 09:51:00 -0500 |
commit | 727c3991dfdb3ff104e33307e287692ef01daec9 (patch) | |
tree | 0935860d3cedaba1e41c6abb9e937c64057d1d8c | |
parent | 4afb65156a79c59fbdbc10abb0bf06ff83f73e23 (diff) | |
parent | 04193d590b390ec7a0592630f46d559ec6564ba1 (diff) | |
download | linux-727c3991dfdb3ff104e33307e287692ef01daec9.tar.bz2 |
Merge tag 'sched-urgent-2022-06-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip
Pull scheduler fix from Thomas Gleixner:
"A single scheduler fix plugging a race between sched_setscheduler()
and balance_push().
sched_setscheduler() spliced the balance callbacks accross a lock
break which makes it possible for an interleaving schedule() to
observe an empty list"
* tag 'sched-urgent-2022-06-19' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip:
sched: Fix balance_push() vs __sched_setscheduler()
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 36 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/sched.h | 5 |
2 files changed, 38 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index bfa7452ca92e..da0bf6fe9ecd 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -4798,25 +4798,55 @@ static void do_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct callback_head *head) static void balance_push(struct rq *rq); +/* + * balance_push_callback is a right abuse of the callback interface and plays + * by significantly different rules. + * + * Where the normal balance_callback's purpose is to be ran in the same context + * that queued it (only later, when it's safe to drop rq->lock again), + * balance_push_callback is specifically targeted at __schedule(). + * + * This abuse is tolerated because it places all the unlikely/odd cases behind + * a single test, namely: rq->balance_callback == NULL. + */ struct callback_head balance_push_callback = { .next = NULL, .func = (void (*)(struct callback_head *))balance_push, }; -static inline struct callback_head *splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq) +static inline struct callback_head * +__splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, bool split) { struct callback_head *head = rq->balance_callback; + if (likely(!head)) + return NULL; + lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq); - if (head) + /* + * Must not take balance_push_callback off the list when + * splice_balance_callbacks() and balance_callbacks() are not + * in the same rq->lock section. + * + * In that case it would be possible for __schedule() to interleave + * and observe the list empty. + */ + if (split && head == &balance_push_callback) + head = NULL; + else rq->balance_callback = NULL; return head; } +static inline struct callback_head *splice_balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq) +{ + return __splice_balance_callbacks(rq, true); +} + static void __balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq) { - do_balance_callbacks(rq, splice_balance_callbacks(rq)); + do_balance_callbacks(rq, __splice_balance_callbacks(rq, false)); } static inline void balance_callbacks(struct rq *rq, struct callback_head *head) diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h index 01259611beb9..47b89a0fc6e5 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h @@ -1693,6 +1693,11 @@ queue_balance_callback(struct rq *rq, { lockdep_assert_rq_held(rq); + /* + * Don't (re)queue an already queued item; nor queue anything when + * balance_push() is active, see the comment with + * balance_push_callback. + */ if (unlikely(head->next || rq->balance_callback == &balance_push_callback)) return; |