diff options
| author | Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org> | 2011-08-25 16:13:55 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> | 2012-01-23 11:43:18 -0800 |
| commit | d07a74a546981a09ba490936645fbf0d1340b96c (patch) | |
| tree | eda5193a28b09fd0f7af994b6762d33b5e8e5b53 | |
| parent | dcd6c92267155e70a94b3927bce681ce74b80d1f (diff) | |
| download | linux-d07a74a546981a09ba490936645fbf0d1340b96c.tar.bz2 | |
dmaengine: fix missing 'cnt' in ?: in dmatest
Hi,
On the latest tree my compiler has started giving the warning:
drivers/dma/dmatest.c:575:28: warning: the omitted middle operand in ?: will always be ?true?, suggest explicit middle operand [-Wparentheses]
The following patch fixes the missing middle clause with the same
fix that Nicolas Ferre used in the similar clauses.
(There seems to have been a race between him fixing that and
the extra clause going in a little later).
I don't actually know the dmatest code/structures, nor do I own
any hardware to test it on (assuming it needs a DMA engine);
but this patch builds, the existing code is almost certainly
wrong and the fix is the same as the corresponding lines above it.
(WTH is x=y?:z legal C anyway?)
Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/dma/dmatest.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c index 2b8661b54eaf..24225f0fdcd8 100644 --- a/drivers/dma/dmatest.c +++ b/drivers/dma/dmatest.c @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ static int dmatest_add_channel(struct dma_chan *chan) } if (dma_has_cap(DMA_PQ, dma_dev->cap_mask)) { cnt = dmatest_add_threads(dtc, DMA_PQ); - thread_count += cnt > 0 ?: 0; + thread_count += cnt > 0 ? cnt : 0; } pr_info("dmatest: Started %u threads using %s\n", |