diff options
author | Dongho Sim <dh.sim@samsung.com> | 2014-07-30 06:52:41 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> | 2014-07-30 15:38:59 -0700 |
commit | 33be828ada7274ebcade2001f16e5b4e33a4636e (patch) | |
tree | 52cd85e9e0f6eb23c68ab6a75ad904603381c19d | |
parent | 24a9ee0fa3d40415765d2d9f6064930d72ad8b5a (diff) | |
download | linux-33be828ada7274ebcade2001f16e5b4e33a4636e.tar.bz2 |
f2fs: remove redundant lines in allocate_data_block
There are redundant lines in allocate_data_block.
In this function, we call refresh_sit_entry with old seg and old curseg.
After that, we call locate_dirty_segment with old curseg.
But, the new address is always allocated from old curseg and
we call locate_dirty_segment with old curseg in refresh_sit_entry.
So, we do not need to call locate_dirty_segment with old curseg again.
We've discussed like below:
Jaegeuk said:
"When considering SSR, we need to take care of the following scenario.
- old segno : X
- new address : Z
- old curseg : Y
This means, a new block is supposed to be written to Z from X.
And Z is newly allocated in the same path from Y.
In that case, we should trigger locate_dirty_segment for Y, since
it was a current_segment and can be dirty owing to SSR.
But that was not included in the dirty list."
Changman said:
"We already choosed old curseg(Y) and then we allocate new address(Z) from old
curseg(Y). After that we call refresh_sit_entry(old address, new address).
In the funcation, we call locate_dirty_segment with old seg and old curseg.
So calling locate_dirty_segment after refresh_sit_entry again is redundant."
Jaegeuk said:
"Right. The new address is always allocated from old_curseg."
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dongho Sim <dh.sim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c index 5a53a0ac6e4f..c3b76d091450 100644 --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c @@ -976,14 +976,12 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page, { struct sit_info *sit_i = SIT_I(sbi); struct curseg_info *curseg; - unsigned int old_cursegno; curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type); mutex_lock(&curseg->curseg_mutex); *new_blkaddr = NEXT_FREE_BLKADDR(sbi, curseg); - old_cursegno = curseg->segno; /* * __add_sum_entry should be resided under the curseg_mutex @@ -1004,7 +1002,6 @@ void allocate_data_block(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page, * since SSR needs latest valid block information. */ refresh_sit_entry(sbi, old_blkaddr, *new_blkaddr); - locate_dirty_segment(sbi, old_cursegno); mutex_unlock(&sit_i->sentry_lock); |