diff options
| author | Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> | 2018-11-30 20:40:56 +0530 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> | 2019-01-21 11:15:36 +0100 |
| commit | 6dc080eeb2ba01973bfff0d79844d7a59e12542e (patch) | |
| tree | 9deefb59370b698572b87e0c3467c87cd3a3f9bc | |
| parent | d7393226d15add056285c8fc86723d54d7e0c77d (diff) | |
| download | linux-6dc080eeb2ba01973bfff0d79844d7a59e12542e.tar.bz2 | |
sched/wait: Fix rcuwait_wake_up() ordering
For some peculiar reason rcuwait_wake_up() has the right barrier in
the comment, but not in the code.
This mistake has been observed to cause a deadlock in the following
situation:
P1 P2
percpu_up_read() percpu_down_write()
rcu_sync_is_idle() // false
rcu_sync_enter()
...
__percpu_up_read()
[S] ,- __this_cpu_dec(*sem->read_count)
| smp_rmb();
[L] | task = rcu_dereference(w->task) // NULL
|
| [S] w->task = current
| smp_mb();
| [L] readers_active_check() // fail
`-> <store happens here>
Where the smp_rmb() (obviously) fails to constrain the store.
[ peterz: Added changelog. ]
Signed-off-by: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@amarulasolutions.com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Fixes: 8f95c90ceb54 ("sched/wait, RCU: Introduce rcuwait machinery")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1543590656-7157-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/exit.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c index 284f2fe9a293..3fb7be001964 100644 --- a/kernel/exit.c +++ b/kernel/exit.c @@ -307,7 +307,7 @@ void rcuwait_wake_up(struct rcuwait *w) * MB (A) MB (B) * [L] cond [L] tsk */ - smp_rmb(); /* (B) */ + smp_mb(); /* (B) */ /* * Avoid using task_rcu_dereference() magic as long as we are careful, |