diff options
| author | Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> | 2018-08-08 12:54:09 -0400 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> | 2018-08-08 12:59:06 -0400 |
| commit | da33a871ba178dbe81da7d755818d3c2088cae32 (patch) | |
| tree | c0298c6e59bdc6ee3646a9f8e7cdf0aa55f32cec | |
| parent | 96c25b777442d3a875b1921b1f047ea00d96c8ea (diff) | |
| download | linux-da33a871ba178dbe81da7d755818d3c2088cae32.tar.bz2 | |
locks: remove misleading obsolete comment
The spinlock handling in this file has changed significantly since this
comment was written, and the file_lock_lock is no more. In addition,
this overall comment no longer applies. Deleting an entry now requires
both locks.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/locks.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c index 6138a9bcd924..11a4d698aba8 100644 --- a/fs/locks.c +++ b/fs/locks.c @@ -202,10 +202,6 @@ static DEFINE_HASHTABLE(blocked_hash, BLOCKED_HASH_BITS); * we often hold the flc_lock as well. In certain cases, when reading the fields * protected by this lock, we can skip acquiring it iff we already hold the * flc_lock. - * - * In particular, adding an entry to the fl_block list requires that you hold - * both the flc_lock and the blocked_lock_lock (acquired in that order). - * Deleting an entry from the list however only requires the file_lock_lock. */ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(blocked_lock_lock); |