summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>2013-11-22 12:04:18 +0100
committerMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>2013-11-25 09:15:41 +0100
commit8adbf78ec4839c1dc4ff20c9a1f332a7bc99e6e6 (patch)
tree303b6c395fd521916b999aa11f65738a68f68315
parent79c74ecbebf76732f91b82a62ce7fc8a88326962 (diff)
downloadlinux-8adbf78ec4839c1dc4ff20c9a1f332a7bc99e6e6.tar.bz2
s390,time: revert direct ktime path for s390 clockevent device
Git commit 4f37a68cdaf6dea833cfdded2a3e0c47c0f006da "s390: Use direct ktime path for s390 clockevent device" makes use of the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_KTIME clockevent option to avoid the delta calculation with ktime_get() in clockevents_program_event and the get_tod_clock() in s390_next_event. This is based on the assumption that the difference between the internal ktime and the hardware clock is reflected in the wall_to_monotonic delta. But this is not true, the ntp corrections are applied via changes to the tk->mult multiplier and this is not reflected in wall_to_monotonic. In theory this could be solved by using the raw monotonic clock but it is simpler to switch back to the standard clock delta calculation. Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
-rw-r--r--arch/s390/kernel/time.c19
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
index 60a508a9b981..dd95f1631621 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
@@ -108,20 +108,10 @@ static void fixup_clock_comparator(unsigned long long delta)
set_clock_comparator(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator);
}
-static int s390_next_ktime(ktime_t expires,
+static int s390_next_event(unsigned long delta,
struct clock_event_device *evt)
{
- struct timespec ts;
- u64 nsecs;
-
- ts.tv_sec = ts.tv_nsec = 0;
- monotonic_to_bootbased(&ts);
- nsecs = ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(timespec_to_ktime(ts), expires));
- do_div(nsecs, 125);
- S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = sched_clock_base_cc + (nsecs << 9);
- /* Program the maximum value if we have an overflow (== year 2042) */
- if (unlikely(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator < sched_clock_base_cc))
- S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = -1ULL;
+ S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = get_tod_clock() + delta;
set_clock_comparator(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator);
return 0;
}
@@ -146,15 +136,14 @@ void init_cpu_timer(void)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
cd = &per_cpu(comparators, cpu);
cd->name = "comparator";
- cd->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT |
- CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_KTIME;
+ cd->features = CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT;
cd->mult = 16777;
cd->shift = 12;
cd->min_delta_ns = 1;
cd->max_delta_ns = LONG_MAX;
cd->rating = 400;
cd->cpumask = cpumask_of(cpu);
- cd->set_next_ktime = s390_next_ktime;
+ cd->set_next_event = s390_next_event;
cd->set_mode = s390_set_mode;
clockevents_register_device(cd);