diff options
author | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2013-03-13 16:51:35 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> | 2013-03-13 16:51:35 -0700 |
commit | 983ca25e738ee0c9c5435a503a6bb0034d4552b0 (patch) | |
tree | 24d945cc7c5476220f5d7c3a1fefddbc2f056373 | |
parent | 699ce097efe8f45bc5c055e4f12cb1e271c270d9 (diff) | |
download | linux-983ca25e738ee0c9c5435a503a6bb0034d4552b0.tar.bz2 |
workqueue: fix max_active handling in init_and_link_pwq()
Since 9e8cd2f589 ("workqueue: implement apply_workqueue_attrs()"),
init_and_link_pwq() may be called to initialize a new pool_workqueue
for a workqueue which is already online, but the function was setting
pwq->max_active to wq->saved_max_active without proper
synchronization.
Fix it by calling pwq_adjust_max_active() under proper locking instead
of manually setting max_active.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r-- | kernel/workqueue.c | 14 |
1 files changed, 9 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c index 9e2ec4ca415a..756761480a1a 100644 --- a/kernel/workqueue.c +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c @@ -3771,21 +3771,25 @@ static void init_and_link_pwq(struct pool_workqueue *pwq, pwq->wq = wq; pwq->flush_color = -1; pwq->refcnt = 1; - pwq->max_active = wq->saved_max_active; INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->delayed_works); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&pwq->mayday_node); INIT_WORK(&pwq->unbound_release_work, pwq_unbound_release_workfn); - /* - * Link @pwq and set the matching work_color. This is synchronized - * with flush_mutex to avoid confusing flush_workqueue(). - */ mutex_lock(&wq->flush_mutex); spin_lock_irq(&workqueue_lock); + /* + * Set the matching work_color. This is synchronized with + * flush_mutex to avoid confusing flush_workqueue(). + */ if (p_last_pwq) *p_last_pwq = first_pwq(wq); pwq->work_color = wq->work_color; + + /* sync max_active to the current setting */ + pwq_adjust_max_active(pwq); + + /* link in @pwq */ list_add_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node, &wq->pwqs); spin_unlock_irq(&workqueue_lock); |