diff options
| author | Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com> | 2016-03-19 12:58:07 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> | 2016-03-21 17:46:57 -0300 |
| commit | 3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15 (patch) | |
| tree | c5b0cc391c16aa08836f6908b41f9e4500b4724f | |
| parent | 73cdf0c6ea9c597894924f3b91ad636389555c1b (diff) | |
| download | linux-3c52b658b8e4fbbf7975932bbdc4798421dbcb15.tar.bz2 | |
perf bench numa: Fix assertion for nodes bitfield
Comparing bits and bytes in numa benchmark assertion
I hit the issue on two socket Power8 machine presenting its numa nodes
as 0,1,16,17 (according to numactl). Therefore I got error (and hang of
parent process):
perf: bench/numa.c:296: bind_to_memnode: Assertion `!(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask))' failed.
This is obviously false positive. We can fit all the 18 nodes into
bitfield of 8 bytes (long on 64b architecture).
Signed-off-by: Jakub Jelen <jakuje@gmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jakub Jelen <jjelen@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: trivial@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1458388687-24421-1-git-send-email-jakuje@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/perf/bench/numa.c | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c index 5049d6357a46..7500d959d7eb 100644 --- a/tools/perf/bench/numa.c +++ b/tools/perf/bench/numa.c @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static void bind_to_memnode(int node) if (node == -1) return; - BUG_ON(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask)); + BUG_ON(g->p.nr_nodes > (int)sizeof(nodemask)*8); nodemask = 1L << node; ret = set_mempolicy(MPOL_BIND, &nodemask, sizeof(nodemask)*8); |