diff options
| author | Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com> | 2010-09-15 21:46:02 +0900 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> | 2010-09-23 13:49:50 +0200 |
| commit | 72b43570f304634532b4d66c991eef529135f68c (patch) | |
| tree | ce35480ad0f0a9ebe01530e84636450498cf439d | |
| parent | 35df83970ecdc2cffb141503cf721a740d0f0ec5 (diff) | |
| download | linux-72b43570f304634532b4d66c991eef529135f68c.tar.bz2 | |
ext2: fix a typo on comment in ext2/inode.c
'excpet' should be 'except'.
'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
| -rw-r--r-- | fs/ext2/inode.c | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c index 940c96168868..533699c16040 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ failed_out: * the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after * we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last * triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same - * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one + * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one * place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not * set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should * be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap. @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex); /* * If the indirect block is missing while we are reading - * the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or + * the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or * if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore, * (either because another process truncated this branch, or * another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if |