From b26ba202e0500eb852e89499ece1b2deaa64c3a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Herbert Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 08:47:09 -0700 Subject: net: Eliminate no_check from protosw It doesn't seem like an protocols are setting anything other than the default, and allowing to arbitrarily disable checksums for a whole protocol seems dangerous. This can be done on a per socket basis. Signed-off-by: Tom Herbert Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/sctp/ipv6.c | 2 -- net/sctp/protocol.c | 2 -- 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'net/sctp') diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c index 4dc5d9e08311..1999592ba88c 100644 --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c @@ -943,7 +943,6 @@ static struct inet_protosw sctpv6_seqpacket_protosw = { .protocol = IPPROTO_SCTP, .prot = &sctpv6_prot, .ops = &inet6_seqpacket_ops, - .no_check = 0, .flags = SCTP_PROTOSW_FLAG }; static struct inet_protosw sctpv6_stream_protosw = { @@ -951,7 +950,6 @@ static struct inet_protosw sctpv6_stream_protosw = { .protocol = IPPROTO_SCTP, .prot = &sctpv6_prot, .ops = &inet6_seqpacket_ops, - .no_check = 0, .flags = SCTP_PROTOSW_FLAG, }; diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c index af5afca4b85a..6789d785e698 100644 --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c @@ -1017,7 +1017,6 @@ static struct inet_protosw sctp_seqpacket_protosw = { .protocol = IPPROTO_SCTP, .prot = &sctp_prot, .ops = &inet_seqpacket_ops, - .no_check = 0, .flags = SCTP_PROTOSW_FLAG }; static struct inet_protosw sctp_stream_protosw = { @@ -1025,7 +1024,6 @@ static struct inet_protosw sctp_stream_protosw = { .protocol = IPPROTO_SCTP, .prot = &sctp_prot, .ops = &inet_seqpacket_ops, - .no_check = 0, .flags = SCTP_PROTOSW_FLAG }; -- cgit v1.2.3