From 7b1dd2cf06e1da9a0982937e82736daa6cd400ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mark Rutland Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 18:51:49 +0100 Subject: kunit: log numbers in decimal and hex When KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ() or KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ() log a failure, they log the two values being compared, with numerical values logged in decimal. In some cases, decimal output is painful to consume, and hexadecimal output would be more helpful. For example, this is the case for tests I'm currently developing for the arm64 insn encoding/decoding code, where comparing two 32-bit instruction opcodes results in output such as: | # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791 | Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but | obj_insn == 2332164128 | gen_insn == 1258422304 To make this easier to consume, this patch logs the values in both decimal and hexadecimal: | # test_insn_add_shifted_reg: EXPECTATION FAILED at arch/arm64/lib/test_insn.c:2791 | Expected obj_insn == gen_insn, but | obj_insn == 2332164128 (0x8b020020) | gen_insn == 1258422304 (0x4b020020) As can be seen from the example, having hexadecimal makes it significantly easier for a human to spot which specific bits are incorrect. Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland Cc: Brendan Higgins Cc: David Gow Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Acked-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/kunit/assert.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c index d00d6d181ee8..24dec5b48722 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/assert.c +++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c @@ -127,13 +127,15 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, binary_assert->text->right_text); if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->left_text, binary_assert->left_value, stream->gfp)) - string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld\n", + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld (0x%llx)\n", binary_assert->text->left_text, + binary_assert->left_value, binary_assert->left_value); if (!is_literal(stream->test, binary_assert->text->right_text, binary_assert->right_value, stream->gfp)) - string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld", + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld (0x%llx)", binary_assert->text->right_text, + binary_assert->right_value, binary_assert->right_value); kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); } -- cgit v1.2.3 From b8a926bea8b1e790b0afe21359c086e3ee08aee5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maíra Canal Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:10:41 -0300 Subject: kunit: Introduce KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ macros MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Currently, in order to compare memory blocks in KUnit, the KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ or KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE macros are used in conjunction with the memcmp function, such as: KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, memcmp(foo, bar, size), 0); Although this usage produces correct results for the test cases, when the expectation fails, the error message is not very helpful, indicating only the return of the memcmp function. Therefore, create a new set of macros KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ that compare memory blocks until a specified size. In case of expectation failure, those macros print the hex dump of the memory blocks, making it easier to debug test failures for memory blocks. That said, the expectation KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, memcmp(foo, bar, size), 0); would translate to the expectation KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, foo, bar, size); Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: Muhammad Usama Anjum Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- include/kunit/assert.h | 33 +++++++++++++++++++ include/kunit/test.h | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/kunit/assert.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 176 insertions(+) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/include/kunit/assert.h b/include/kunit/assert.h index ace3de8d1ee7..e8a59487fd59 100644 --- a/include/kunit/assert.h +++ b/include/kunit/assert.h @@ -240,4 +240,37 @@ void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, const struct va_format *message, struct string_stream *stream); +#define KUNIT_INIT_MEM_ASSERT_STRUCT(text_, left_val, right_val, size_) { \ + .text = text_, \ + .left_value = left_val, \ + .right_value = right_val, \ + .size = size_ \ +} + +/** + * struct kunit_mem_assert - An expectation/assertion that compares two + * memory blocks. + * @assert: The parent of this type. + * @text: Holds the textual representations of the operands and comparator. + * @left_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the left slot. + * @right_value: The actual evaluated value of the expression in the right slot. + * @size: Size of the memory block analysed in bytes. + * + * Represents an expectation/assertion that compares two memory blocks. For + * example, to expect that the first three bytes of foo is equal to the + * first three bytes of bar, you can use the expectation + * KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, foo, bar, 3); + */ +struct kunit_mem_assert { + struct kunit_assert assert; + const struct kunit_binary_assert_text *text; + const void *left_value; + const void *right_value; + const size_t size; +}; + +void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, + const struct va_format *message, + struct string_stream *stream); + #endif /* _KUNIT_ASSERT_H */ diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index b1ab6b32216d..cde97dc4eed5 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -658,6 +658,39 @@ do { \ ##__VA_ARGS__); \ } while (0) +#define KUNIT_MEM_ASSERTION(test, \ + assert_type, \ + left, \ + op, \ + right, \ + size, \ + fmt, \ + ...) \ +do { \ + const void *__left = (left); \ + const void *__right = (right); \ + const size_t __size = (size); \ + static const struct kunit_binary_assert_text __text = { \ + .operation = #op, \ + .left_text = #left, \ + .right_text = #right, \ + }; \ + \ + if (likely(memcmp(__left, __right, __size) op 0)) \ + break; \ + \ + _KUNIT_FAILED(test, \ + assert_type, \ + kunit_mem_assert, \ + kunit_mem_assert_format, \ + KUNIT_INIT_MEM_ASSERT_STRUCT(&__text, \ + __left, \ + __right, \ + __size), \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__); \ +} while (0) + #define KUNIT_PTR_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL_MSG_ASSERTION(test, \ assert_type, \ ptr, \ @@ -928,6 +961,60 @@ do { \ fmt, \ ##__VA_ARGS__) +/** + * KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ() - Expects that the first @size bytes of @left and @right are equal. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: An arbitrary expression that evaluates to the specified size. + * @right: An arbitrary expression that evaluates to the specified size. + * @size: Number of bytes compared. + * + * Sets an expectation that the values that @left and @right evaluate to are + * equal. This is semantically equivalent to + * KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, !memcmp((@left), (@right), (@size))). See + * KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE() for more information. + * + * Although this expectation works for any memory block, it is not recommended + * for comparing more structured data, such as structs. This expectation is + * recommended for comparing, for example, data arrays. + */ +#define KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, left, right, size) \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, left, right, size, NULL) + +#define KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ_MSG(test, left, right, size, fmt, ...) \ + KUNIT_MEM_ASSERTION(test, \ + KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \ + left, ==, right, \ + size, \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__) + +/** + * KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ() - Expects that the first @size bytes of @left and @right are not equal. + * @test: The test context object. + * @left: An arbitrary expression that evaluates to the specified size. + * @right: An arbitrary expression that evaluates to the specified size. + * @size: Number of bytes compared. + * + * Sets an expectation that the values that @left and @right evaluate to are + * not equal. This is semantically equivalent to + * KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(@test, memcmp((@left), (@right), (@size))). See + * KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE() for more information. + * + * Although this expectation works for any memory block, it is not recommended + * for comparing more structured data, such as structs. This expectation is + * recommended for comparing, for example, data arrays. + */ +#define KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ(test, left, right, size) \ + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ_MSG(test, left, right, size, NULL) + +#define KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ_MSG(test, left, right, size, fmt, ...) \ + KUNIT_MEM_ASSERTION(test, \ + KUNIT_EXPECTATION, \ + left, !=, right, \ + size, \ + fmt, \ + ##__VA_ARGS__) + /** * KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL() - Expects that @ptr is null. * @test: The test context object. diff --git a/lib/kunit/assert.c b/lib/kunit/assert.c index 24dec5b48722..f5b50babe38d 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/assert.c +++ b/lib/kunit/assert.c @@ -206,3 +206,59 @@ void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_binary_str_assert_format); + +/* Adds a hexdump of a buffer to a string_stream comparing it with + * a second buffer. The different bytes are marked with <>. + */ +static void kunit_assert_hexdump(struct string_stream *stream, + const void *buf, + const void *compared_buf, + const size_t len) +{ + size_t i; + const u8 *buf1 = buf; + const u8 *buf2 = compared_buf; + + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT); + + for (i = 0; i < len; ++i) { + if (!(i % 16) && i) + string_stream_add(stream, "\n" KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT); + + if (buf1[i] != buf2[i]) + string_stream_add(stream, "<%02x>", buf1[i]); + else + string_stream_add(stream, " %02x ", buf1[i]); + } +} + +void kunit_mem_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert, + const struct va_format *message, + struct string_stream *stream) +{ + struct kunit_mem_assert *mem_assert; + + mem_assert = container_of(assert, struct kunit_mem_assert, + assert); + + string_stream_add(stream, + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n", + mem_assert->text->left_text, + mem_assert->text->operation, + mem_assert->text->right_text); + + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s ==\n", + mem_assert->text->left_text); + kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, mem_assert->left_value, + mem_assert->right_value, mem_assert->size); + + string_stream_add(stream, "\n"); + + string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s ==\n", + mem_assert->text->right_text); + kunit_assert_hexdump(stream, mem_assert->right_value, + mem_assert->left_value, mem_assert->size); + + kunit_assert_print_msg(message, stream); +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_mem_assert_format); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 3b30fb62ec23b42be33d94ebf825d27daf508e8e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Maíra Canal Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 20:10:42 -0300 Subject: kunit: Add KUnit memory block assertions to the example_all_expect_macros_test MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Augment the example_all_expect_macros_test with the KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ and KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ macros by creating a test with memory block assertions. Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c index f8fe582c9e36..66cc4e2365ec 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c @@ -86,6 +86,9 @@ static void example_mark_skipped_test(struct kunit *test) */ static void example_all_expect_macros_test(struct kunit *test) { + const u32 array1[] = { 0x0F, 0xFF }; + const u32 array2[] = { 0x1F, 0xFF }; + /* Boolean assertions */ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, true); KUNIT_EXPECT_FALSE(test, false); @@ -109,6 +112,10 @@ static void example_all_expect_macros_test(struct kunit *test) KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "hi", "hi"); KUNIT_EXPECT_STRNEQ(test, "hi", "bye"); + /* Memory block assertions */ + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMEQ(test, array1, array1, sizeof(array1)); + KUNIT_EXPECT_MEMNEQ(test, array1, array2, sizeof(array1)); + /* * There are also ASSERT variants of all of the above that abort test * execution if they fail. Useful for memory allocations, etc. -- cgit v1.2.3 From 8f8b51f7d5c8bd3a89e7ea87aed2cdaa52ca5ba4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "YoungJun.park" Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 18:59:46 -0700 Subject: kunit: remove unused structure definition remove unused string_stream_alloc_context structure definition. Signed-off-by: YoungJun.park Reviewed-by: David Gow Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/kunit/string-stream.c | 5 ----- 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/kunit/string-stream.c b/lib/kunit/string-stream.c index f5ae79c37400..72659a9773e3 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/string-stream.c +++ b/lib/kunit/string-stream.c @@ -131,11 +131,6 @@ bool string_stream_is_empty(struct string_stream *stream) return list_empty(&stream->fragments); } -struct string_stream_alloc_context { - struct kunit *test; - gfp_t gfp; -}; - struct string_stream *alloc_string_stream(struct kunit *test, gfp_t gfp) { struct string_stream *stream; -- cgit v1.2.3 From 908d0c177bbc7c34ab9129c6f2bcd87487115632 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Gow Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:43:04 +0800 Subject: kunit: Provide a static key to check if KUnit is actively running tests KUnit does a few expensive things when enabled. This hasn't been a problem because KUnit was only enabled on test kernels, but with a few people enabling (but not _using_) KUnit on production systems, we need a runtime way of handling this. Provide a 'kunit_running' static key (defaulting to false), which allows us to hide any KUnit code behind a static branch. This should reduce the performance impact (on other code) of having KUnit enabled to a single NOP when no tests are running. Note that, while it looks unintuitive, tests always run entirely within __kunit_test_suites_init(), so it's safe to decrement the static key at the end of this function, rather than in __kunit_test_suites_exit(), which is only there to clean up results in debugfs. Signed-off-by: David Gow Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- include/kunit/test.h | 4 ++++ lib/kunit/test.c | 6 ++++++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h index 4666a4d199ea..87ea90576b50 100644 --- a/include/kunit/test.h +++ b/include/kunit/test.h @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -27,6 +28,9 @@ #include +/* Static key: true if any KUnit tests are currently running */ +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kunit_running); + struct kunit; /* Size of log associated with test. */ diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 90640a43cf62..314717b63080 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ #include "string-stream.h" #include "try-catch-impl.h" +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kunit_running); + #if IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_KUNIT) /* * Fail the current test and print an error message to the log. @@ -612,10 +614,14 @@ int __kunit_test_suites_init(struct kunit_suite * const * const suites, int num_ return 0; } + static_branch_inc(&kunit_running); + for (i = 0; i < num_suites; i++) { kunit_init_suite(suites[i]); kunit_run_tests(suites[i]); } + + static_branch_dec(&kunit_running); return 0; } EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kunit_test_suites_init); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 909c6475d568826be377893cf5abb7cde5877230 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Gow Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2022 16:43:06 +0800 Subject: mm: slub: test: Use the kunit_get_current_test() function Use the newly-added function kunit_get_current_test() instead of accessing current->kunit_test directly. This function uses a static key to return more quickly when KUnit is enabled, but no tests are actively running. There should therefore be a negligible performance impact to enabling the slub KUnit tests. Other than the performance improvement, this should be a no-op. Cc: Oliver Glitta Cc: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Cc: Christoph Lameter Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: David Rientjes Cc: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: David Gow Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka Acked-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/slub_kunit.c | 1 + mm/slub.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/slub_kunit.c b/lib/slub_kunit.c index 7a0564d7cb7a..8fd19c8301ad 100644 --- a/lib/slub_kunit.c +++ b/lib/slub_kunit.c @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 #include +#include #include #include #include diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c index 157527d7101b..1887996cb703 100644 --- a/mm/slub.c +++ b/mm/slub.c @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -603,7 +604,7 @@ static bool slab_add_kunit_errors(void) { struct kunit_resource *resource; - if (likely(!current->kunit_test)) + if (!kunit_get_current_test()) return false; resource = kunit_find_named_resource(current->kunit_test, "slab_errors"); -- cgit v1.2.3 From 6c738b52316c58ae8a87abf0907f87a7b5e7a109 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Rae Moar Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 18:25:58 +0000 Subject: kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Change KUnit test output to better comply with KTAP v1 specifications found here: https://kernel.org/doc/html/latest/dev-tools/ktap.html. 1) Use "KTAP version 1" instead of "TAP version 14" as test output header 2) Remove '-' between test number and test name on test result lines 2) Add KTAP version lines to each subtest header as well Note that the new KUnit output still includes the “# Subtest” line now located after the KTAP version line. This does not completely match the KTAP v1 spec but since it is classified as a diagnostic line, it is not expected to be disruptive or break any existing parsers. This “# Subtest” line comes from the TAP 14 spec (https://testanything.org/tap-version-14-specification.html) and it is used to define the test name before the results. Original output: TAP version 14 1..1 # Subtest: kunit-test-suite 1..3 ok 1 - kunit_test_1 ok 2 - kunit_test_2 ok 3 - kunit_test_3 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 ok 1 - kunit-test-suite New output: KTAP version 1 1..1 KTAP version 1 # Subtest: kunit-test-suite 1..3 ok 1 kunit_test_1 ok 2 kunit_test_2 ok 3 kunit_test_3 # kunit-test-suite: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 # Totals: pass:3 fail:0 skip:0 total:3 ok 1 kunit-test-suite Signed-off-by: Rae Moar Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov Reviewed-by: David Gow Tested-by: Anders Roxell Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan --- lib/kunit/debugfs.c | 2 +- lib/kunit/executor.c | 6 +++--- lib/kunit/test.c | 9 ++++++--- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib') diff --git a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c index 1048ef1b8d6e..de0ee2e03ed6 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/debugfs.c +++ b/lib/kunit/debugfs.c @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ static int debugfs_print_results(struct seq_file *seq, void *v) kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) debugfs_print_result(seq, suite, test_case); - seq_printf(seq, "%s %d - %s\n", + seq_printf(seq, "%s %d %s\n", kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(success), 1, suite->name); return 0; } diff --git a/lib/kunit/executor.c b/lib/kunit/executor.c index 9bbc422c284b..74982b83707c 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/executor.c +++ b/lib/kunit/executor.c @@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static void kunit_exec_run_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) { size_t num_suites = suite_set->end - suite_set->start; - pr_info("TAP version 14\n"); + pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); pr_info("1..%zu\n", num_suites); __kunit_test_suites_init(suite_set->start, num_suites); @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static void kunit_exec_list_tests(struct suite_set *suite_set) struct kunit_suite * const *suites; struct kunit_case *test_case; - /* Hack: print a tap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */ - pr_info("TAP version 14\n"); + /* Hack: print a ktap header so kunit.py can find the start of KUnit output. */ + pr_info("KTAP version 1\n"); for (suites = suite_set->start; suites < suite_set->end; suites++) kunit_suite_for_each_test_case((*suites), test_case) { diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c index 314717b63080..87a5d795843b 100644 --- a/lib/kunit/test.c +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases); static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite) { + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "KTAP version 1\n"); kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s", suite->name); kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd", @@ -177,13 +178,13 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite, * representation. */ if (suite) - pr_info("%s %zd - %s%s%s\n", + pr_info("%s %zd %s%s%s\n", kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), test_number, description, directive_header, (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""); else kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, - KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s%s%s", + KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd %s%s%s", kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(status), test_number, description, directive_header, (status == KUNIT_SKIPPED) ? directive : ""); @@ -544,6 +545,8 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) /* Get initial param. */ param_desc[0] = '\0'; test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL, param_desc); + kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT + "KTAP version 1\n"); kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s", test_case->name); @@ -557,7 +560,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite) kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT - "%s %d - %s", + "%s %d %s", kunit_status_to_ok_not_ok(test.status), test.param_index + 1, param_desc); -- cgit v1.2.3