From 20bb759a66be52cf4a9ddd17fddaf509e11490cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Will Deacon Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:58:00 -0700 Subject: panic: ensure preemption is disabled during panic() Calling 'panic()' on a kernel with CONFIG_PREEMPT=y can leave the calling CPU in an infinite loop, but with interrupts and preemption enabled. From this state, userspace can continue to be scheduled, despite the system being "dead" as far as the kernel is concerned. This is easily reproducible on arm64 when booting with "nosmp" on the command line; a couple of shell scripts print out a periodic "Ping" message whilst another triggers a crash by writing to /proc/sysrq-trigger: | sysrq: Trigger a crash | Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash | CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.2.15 #1 | Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT) | Call trace: | dump_backtrace+0x0/0x148 | show_stack+0x14/0x20 | dump_stack+0xa0/0xc4 | panic+0x140/0x32c | sysrq_handle_reboot+0x0/0x20 | __handle_sysrq+0x124/0x190 | write_sysrq_trigger+0x64/0x88 | proc_reg_write+0x60/0xa8 | __vfs_write+0x18/0x40 | vfs_write+0xa4/0x1b8 | ksys_write+0x64/0xf0 | __arm64_sys_write+0x14/0x20 | el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0xb0/0x168 | el0_svc_handler+0x28/0x78 | el0_svc+0x8/0xc | Kernel Offset: disabled | CPU features: 0x0002,24002004 | Memory Limit: none | ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: sysrq triggered crash ]--- | Ping 2! | Ping 1! | Ping 1! | Ping 2! The issue can also be triggered on x86 kernels if CONFIG_SMP=n, otherwise local interrupts are disabled in 'smp_send_stop()'. Disable preemption in 'panic()' before re-enabling interrupts. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191002123538.22609-1-will@kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/BX1W47JXPMR8.58IYW53H6M5N@dragonstone Signed-off-by: Will Deacon Reported-by: Xogium Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Cc: Russell King Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Ingo Molnar Cc: Petr Mladek Cc: Feng Tang Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/panic.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/panic.c b/kernel/panic.c index 47e8ebccc22b..f470a038b05b 100644 --- a/kernel/panic.c +++ b/kernel/panic.c @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ void panic(const char *fmt, ...) * after setting panic_cpu) from invoking panic() again. */ local_irq_disable(); + preempt_disable_notrace(); /* * It's possible to come here directly from a panic-assertion and -- cgit v1.2.3 From b0f53dbc4bc4c371f38b14c391095a3bb8a0bb40 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michal Hocko Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 17:58:19 -0700 Subject: kernel/sysctl.c: do not override max_threads provided by userspace Partially revert 16db3d3f1170 ("kernel/sysctl.c: threads-max observe limits") because the patch is causing a regression to any workload which needs to override the auto-tuning of the limit provided by kernel. set_max_threads is implementing a boot time guesstimate to provide a sensible limit of the concurrently running threads so that runaways will not deplete all the memory. This is a good thing in general but there are workloads which might need to increase this limit for an application to run (reportedly WebSpher MQ is affected) and that is simply not possible after the mentioned change. It is also very dubious to override an admin decision by an estimation that doesn't have any direct relation to correctness of the kernel operation. Fix this by dropping set_max_threads from sysctl_max_threads so any value is accepted as long as it fits into MAX_THREADS which is important to check because allowing more threads could break internal robust futex restriction. While at it, do not use MIN_THREADS as the lower boundary because it is also only a heuristic for automatic estimation and admin might have a good reason to stop new threads to be created even when below this limit. This became more severe when we switched x86 from 4k to 8k kernel stacks. Starting since 6538b8ea886e ("x86_64: expand kernel stack to 16K") (3.16) we use THREAD_SIZE_ORDER = 2 and that halved the auto-tuned value. In the particular case 3.12 kernel.threads-max = 515561 4.4 kernel.threads-max = 200000 Neither of the two values is really insane on 32GB machine. I am not sure we want/need to tune the max_thread value further. If anything the tuning should be removed altogether if proven not useful in general. But we definitely need a way to override this auto-tuning. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190922065801.GB18814@dhcp22.suse.cz Fixes: 16db3d3f1170 ("kernel/sysctl.c: threads-max observe limits") Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Heinrich Schuchardt Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- kernel/fork.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'kernel') diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c index 1f6c45f6a734..bcdf53125210 100644 --- a/kernel/fork.c +++ b/kernel/fork.c @@ -2925,7 +2925,7 @@ int sysctl_max_threads(struct ctl_table *table, int write, struct ctl_table t; int ret; int threads = max_threads; - int min = MIN_THREADS; + int min = 1; int max = MAX_THREADS; t = *table; @@ -2937,7 +2937,7 @@ int sysctl_max_threads(struct ctl_table *table, int write, if (ret || !write) return ret; - set_max_threads(threads); + max_threads = threads; return 0; } -- cgit v1.2.3