From da7142e2ed735e1c1bef5a757dc55de35c65fbd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 18:11:45 +0200 Subject: sched/core: Simplify preempt_count tests Since we stopped setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE, there is no need to mask it out of preempt_count() tests. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Mike Galbraith Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- kernel/sched/core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'kernel/sched') diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index d6989f85c641..ca260cc5d881 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -7486,7 +7486,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void) #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP static inline int preempt_count_equals(int preempt_offset) { - int nested = (preempt_count() & ~PREEMPT_ACTIVE) + rcu_preempt_depth(); + int nested = preempt_count() + rcu_preempt_depth(); return (nested == preempt_offset); } -- cgit v1.2.3