From d82bccc69041a51f7b7b9b4a36db0772f4cdba21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexei Starovoitov Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 10:26:19 -0700 Subject: bpf/verifier: reject invalid LD_ABS | BPF_DW instruction verifier must check for reserved size bits in instruction opcode and reject BPF_LD | BPF_ABS | BPF_DW and BPF_LD | BPF_IND | BPF_DW instructions, otherwise interpreter will WARN_RATELIMIT on them during execution. Fixes: ddd872bc3098 ("bpf: verifier: add checks for BPF_ABS | BPF_IND instructions") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) (limited to 'kernel/bpf/verifier.c') diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 2e08f8e9b771..618ef77c302a 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -1374,6 +1374,7 @@ static int check_ld_abs(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn) } if (insn->dst_reg != BPF_REG_0 || insn->off != 0 || + BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW || (mode == BPF_ABS && insn->src_reg != BPF_REG_0)) { verbose("BPF_LD_ABS uses reserved fields\n"); return -EINVAL; -- cgit v1.2.3