From c3fe5872eb3f5f9e027d61d8a3f5d092168fdbca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sanidhya Kashyap Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:48:32 -0700 Subject: bfs: correct return values In case of failed memory allocation, the return should be ENOMEM instead of ENOSPC. Return -EIO when sb_bread() fails. Signed-off-by: Sanidhya Kashyap Cc: Tigran Aivazian Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/bfs/dir.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs') diff --git a/fs/bfs/dir.c b/fs/bfs/dir.c index 08063ae0a17c..7a8182770649 100644 --- a/fs/bfs/dir.c +++ b/fs/bfs/dir.c @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static int bfs_create(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, umode_t mode, inode = new_inode(s); if (!inode) - return -ENOSPC; + return -ENOMEM; mutex_lock(&info->bfs_lock); ino = find_first_zero_bit(info->si_imap, info->si_lasti + 1); if (ino > info->si_lasti) { @@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ static int bfs_add_entry(struct inode *dir, const unsigned char *name, for (block = sblock; block <= eblock; block++) { bh = sb_bread(dir->i_sb, block); if (!bh) - return -ENOSPC; + return -EIO; for (off = 0; off < BFS_BSIZE; off += BFS_DIRENT_SIZE) { de = (struct bfs_dirent *)(bh->b_data + off); if (!de->ino) { -- cgit v1.2.3