From 5930122683dff58f0846b0f0405b4bd598a3ba6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Al Viro Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:19:30 -0400 Subject: switch xattr_handler->set() to passing dentry and inode separately preparation for similar switch in ->setxattr() (see the next commit for rationale). Signed-off-by: Al Viro --- fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c') diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c index 86aeb9dd805a..e4cbb7719906 100644 --- a/fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c +++ b/fs/reiserfs/xattr_security.c @@ -20,13 +20,14 @@ security_get(const struct xattr_handler *handler, struct dentry *unused, } static int -security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, struct dentry *dentry, - const char *name, const void *buffer, size_t size, int flags) +security_set(const struct xattr_handler *handler, struct dentry *unused, + struct inode *inode, const char *name, const void *buffer, + size_t size, int flags) { - if (IS_PRIVATE(d_inode(dentry))) + if (IS_PRIVATE(inode)) return -EPERM; - return reiserfs_xattr_set(d_inode(dentry), + return reiserfs_xattr_set(inode, xattr_full_name(handler, name), buffer, size, flags); } -- cgit v1.2.3