From d324cd4c80b9cbe1c2ac5285f071387c79bea455 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: piaojun Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2018 16:18:37 -0700 Subject: ocfs2: use 'oi' instead of 'OCFS2_I()' We could use 'oi' instead of 'OCFS2_I()' to make code more elegant. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5A7020FE.5050906@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jun Piao Reviewed-by: Yiwen Jiang Reviewed-by: Alex Chen Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton Cc: Mark Fasheh Cc: Joel Becker Cc: Junxiao Bi Cc: Joseph Qi Cc: Changwei Ge Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- fs/ocfs2/inode.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/ocfs2/inode.c') diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c index 152f65b9c60e..ddc3e9470c87 100644 --- a/fs/ocfs2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ocfs2/inode.c @@ -1160,7 +1160,7 @@ static void ocfs2_clear_inode(struct inode *inode) * exception here are successfully wiped inodes - their * metadata can now be considered to be part of the system * inodes from which it came. */ - if (!(OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_flags & OCFS2_INODE_DELETED)) + if (!(oi->ip_flags & OCFS2_INODE_DELETED)) ocfs2_checkpoint_inode(inode); mlog_bug_on_msg(!list_empty(&oi->ip_io_markers), -- cgit v1.2.3