From 9a31d7ad997f55768c687974ce36b759065b49e5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:14:56 +0100 Subject: fsnotify: fix pinning group in fsnotify_prepare_user_wait() Blind increment of group's user_waits is not enough, we could be far enough in the group's destruction that it isn't taken into account (i.e. grabbing the mark ref afterwards doesn't guarantee that it was the ref coming from the _group_ that was grabbed). Instead we need to check (under lock) that the mark is still attached to the group after having obtained a ref to the mark. If not, skip it. Reviewed-by: Amir Goldstein Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi Fixes: 9385a84d7e1f ("fsnotify: Pass fsnotify_iter_info into handle_event handler") Cc: # v4.12 Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/notify/mark.c | 25 +++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/notify') diff --git a/fs/notify/mark.c b/fs/notify/mark.c index 7ecd15add6a7..f3a32ea15b49 100644 --- a/fs/notify/mark.c +++ b/fs/notify/mark.c @@ -255,23 +255,20 @@ void fsnotify_put_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark) */ static bool fsnotify_get_mark_safe(struct fsnotify_mark *mark) { - struct fsnotify_group *group; - if (!mark) return true; - group = mark->group; - /* - * Since acquisition of mark reference is an atomic op as well, we can - * be sure this inc is seen before any effect of refcount increment. - */ - atomic_inc(&group->user_waits); - if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&mark->refcnt)) - return true; - - if (atomic_dec_and_test(&group->user_waits) && group->shutdown) - wake_up(&group->notification_waitq); - + if (atomic_inc_not_zero(&mark->refcnt)) { + spin_lock(&mark->lock); + if (mark->flags & FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_ATTACHED) { + /* mark is attached, group is still alive then */ + atomic_inc(&mark->group->user_waits); + spin_unlock(&mark->lock); + return true; + } + spin_unlock(&mark->lock); + fsnotify_put_mark(mark); + } return false; } -- cgit v1.2.3