From 13c432b51449dcdcfa0350fb87250b1dbd1fbd12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 17:16:12 -0500 Subject: exec: Fix spelling of search_binary_handler in a comment Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87h7wq6zc1.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org Reviewed-by: Kees Cook Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/exec.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'fs/exec.c') diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c index d4387bc92292..82106241ed53 100644 --- a/fs/exec.c +++ b/fs/exec.c @@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@ void __set_task_comm(struct task_struct *tsk, const char *buf, bool exec) * Calling this is the point of no return. None of the failures will be * seen by userspace since either the process is already taking a fatal * signal (via de_thread() or coredump), or will have SEGV raised - * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handlers (see below). + * (after exec_mmap()) by search_binary_handler (see below). */ int begin_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm) { -- cgit v1.2.3