From b103fb7653fff09e7a6fb6ba9398a41584e7ae36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Eric Biggers Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 14:54:36 -0700 Subject: fscrypt: add support for IV_INO_LBLK_64 policies Inline encryption hardware compliant with the UFS v2.1 standard or with the upcoming version of the eMMC standard has the following properties: (1) Per I/O request, the encryption key is specified by a previously loaded keyslot. There might be only a small number of keyslots. (2) Per I/O request, the starting IV is specified by a 64-bit "data unit number" (DUN). IV bits 64-127 are assumed to be 0. The hardware automatically increments the DUN for each "data unit" of configurable size in the request, e.g. for each filesystem block. Property (1) makes it inefficient to use the traditional fscrypt per-file keys. Property (2) precludes the use of the existing DIRECT_KEY fscrypt policy flag, which needs at least 192 IV bits. Therefore, add a new fscrypt policy flag IV_INO_LBLK_64 which causes the encryption to modified as follows: - The encryption keys are derived from the master key, encryption mode number, and filesystem UUID. - The IVs are chosen as (inode_number << 32) | file_logical_block_num. For filenames encryption, file_logical_block_num is 0. Since the file nonces aren't used in the key derivation, many files may share the same encryption key. This is much more efficient on the target hardware. Including the inode number in the IVs and mixing the filesystem UUID into the keys ensures that data in different files is nevertheless still encrypted differently. Additionally, limiting the inode and block numbers to 32 bits and placing the block number in the low bits maintains compatibility with the 64-bit DUN convention (property (2) above). Since this scheme assumes that inode numbers are stable (which may preclude filesystem shrinking) and that inode and file logical block numbers are at most 32-bit, IV_INO_LBLK_64 will only be allowed on filesystems that meet these constraints. These are acceptable limitations for the cases where this format would actually be used. Note that IV_INO_LBLK_64 is an on-disk format, not an implementation. This patch just adds support for it using the existing filesystem layer encryption. A later patch will add support for inline encryption. Reviewed-by: Paul Crowley Co-developed-by: Satya Tangirala Signed-off-by: Satya Tangirala Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers --- fs/crypto/keyring.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'fs/crypto/keyring.c') diff --git a/fs/crypto/keyring.c b/fs/crypto/keyring.c index c34fa7c61b43..040df1f5e1c8 100644 --- a/fs/crypto/keyring.c +++ b/fs/crypto/keyring.c @@ -43,8 +43,10 @@ static void free_master_key(struct fscrypt_master_key *mk) wipe_master_key_secret(&mk->mk_secret); - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mk->mk_mode_keys); i++) - crypto_free_skcipher(mk->mk_mode_keys[i]); + for (i = 0; i <= __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX; i++) { + crypto_free_skcipher(mk->mk_direct_tfms[i]); + crypto_free_skcipher(mk->mk_iv_ino_lblk_64_tfms[i]); + } key_put(mk->mk_users); kzfree(mk); -- cgit v1.2.3