From 026bdb2b96525edd1fb5cc6f24587ff08d277d5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vladimir Oltean Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 16:54:45 +0300 Subject: net: dsa: sja1105: unconditionally free old gating config Currently sja1105_compose_gating_subschedule is not prepared to be called for the case where we want to recompute the global tc-gate configuration after we've deleted those actions on a port. After deleting the tc-gate actions on the last port, max_cycle_time would become zero, and that would incorrectly prevent sja1105_free_gating_config from getting called. So move the freeing function above the check for the need to apply a new configuration. Fixes: 834f8933d5dd ("net: dsa: sja1105: implement tc-gate using time-triggered virtual links") Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers') diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c index 5ffa71f02064..5ff370f507e6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/sja1105/sja1105_vl.c @@ -98,6 +98,8 @@ static int sja1105_compose_gating_subschedule(struct sja1105_private *priv, s64 its_base_time = 0; int i, rc = 0; + sja1105_free_gating_config(gating_cfg); + list_for_each_entry(rule, &priv->flow_block.rules, list) { if (rule->type != SJA1105_RULE_VL) continue; @@ -116,8 +118,6 @@ static int sja1105_compose_gating_subschedule(struct sja1105_private *priv, dev_dbg(priv->ds->dev, "max_cycle_time %lld its_base_time %lld\n", max_cycle_time, its_base_time); - sja1105_free_gating_config(gating_cfg); - gating_cfg->base_time = its_base_time; gating_cfg->cycle_time = max_cycle_time; gating_cfg->num_entries = 0; -- cgit v1.2.3