From e58f2259b91c02974c20db7b28d39d810a21249b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2021 23:27:39 +0100 Subject: genirq/msi, treewide: Use a named struct for PCI/MSI attributes The unnamed struct sucks and is in the way of further cleanups. Stick the PCI related MSI data into a real data structure and cleanup all users. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Tested-by: Juergen Gross Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman Acked-by: Kalle Valo Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211206210224.374863119@linutronix.de --- drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c') diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c index d858d25b6cab..699cc9544424 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int pci_frontend_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev, i = 0; for_each_pci_msi_entry(entry, dev) { - op.msix_entries[i].entry = entry->msi_attrib.entry_nr; + op.msix_entries[i].entry = entry->pci.msi_attrib.entry_nr; /* Vector is useless at this point. */ op.msix_entries[i].vector = -1; i++; -- cgit v1.2.3