From f301606934b240fb54d8edf3618a0483e36046fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrey Smirnov Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:25:33 -0800 Subject: at86rf230: Allow slow GPIO pins for "rstn" Driver code never touches "rstn" signal in atomic context, so there's no need to implicitly put such restriction on it by using gpio_set_value to manipulate it. Replace gpio_set_value to gpio_set_value_cansleep to fix that. As a an example of where such restriction might be inconvenient, consider a hardware design where "rstn" is connected to a pin of I2C/SPI GPIO expander chip. Cc: Chris Healy Signed-off-by: Andrey Smirnov Signed-off-by: Stefan Schmidt Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann --- drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/net/ieee802154') diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c index 46d53a6c8cf8..76ba7ecfe142 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/at86rf230.c @@ -1715,9 +1715,9 @@ static int at86rf230_probe(struct spi_device *spi) /* Reset */ if (gpio_is_valid(rstn)) { udelay(1); - gpio_set_value(rstn, 0); + gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 0); udelay(1); - gpio_set_value(rstn, 1); + gpio_set_value_cansleep(rstn, 1); usleep_range(120, 240); } -- cgit v1.2.3