From 3a9f76bdf365efdc869125f9f2386643007f997b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Brian Norris Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 16:41:46 -0700 Subject: mtd: maps: sc520cdp: fix warnings On m86k, and maybe a few other architectures, we get this kind of warning, due to misuse of volatile: drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c: In function 'sc520cdp_setup_par': >> drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c:223:2: warning: passing argument 1 of 'iounmap' discards 'volatile' qualifier from pointer target type [enabled by default] arch/m68k/include/asm/raw_io.h:22:13: note: expected 'void *' but argument is of type 'volatile long unsigned int *' Rather than annotating the variable declaration, let's just use the proper accessors, which add the 'volatile' qualifier to the operation. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris --- drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/mtd/maps') diff --git a/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c b/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c index 8fead8e46bce..093edd51bdc7 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/maps/sc520cdp.c @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static const struct sc520_par_table par_table[NUM_FLASH_BANKS] = static void sc520cdp_setup_par(void) { - volatile unsigned long __iomem *mmcr; + unsigned long __iomem *mmcr; unsigned long mmcr_val; int i, j; @@ -203,11 +203,11 @@ static void sc520cdp_setup_par(void) */ for(i = 0; i < NUM_FLASH_BANKS; i++) { /* for each par_table entry */ for(j = 0; j < NUM_SC520_PAR; j++) { /* for each PAR register */ - mmcr_val = mmcr[SC520_PAR(j)]; + mmcr_val = readl(&mmcr[SC520_PAR(j)]); /* if target device field matches, reprogram the PAR */ if((mmcr_val & SC520_PAR_TRGDEV) == par_table[i].trgdev) { - mmcr[SC520_PAR(j)] = par_table[i].new_par; + writel(par_table[i].new_par, &mmcr[SC520_PAR(j)]); break; } } -- cgit v1.2.3