From e00d9967e3addea86dded46deefc5daec5d52e5a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bernard Blackham Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2005 17:56:42 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] pm: fix u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in cpufreq Fix u32 vs pm_message_t confusion in cpufreq. Signed-off-by: Bernard Blackham Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek Cc: Dave Jones Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index bf62dfe4976a..7a7859dd0d98 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -869,7 +869,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(cpufreq_get); * cpufreq_suspend - let the low level driver prepare for suspend */ -static int cpufreq_suspend(struct sys_device * sysdev, u32 state) +static int cpufreq_suspend(struct sys_device * sysdev, pm_message_t pmsg) { int cpu = sysdev->id; unsigned int ret = 0; @@ -897,7 +897,7 @@ static int cpufreq_suspend(struct sys_device * sysdev, u32 state) } if (cpufreq_driver->suspend) { - ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(cpu_policy, state); + ret = cpufreq_driver->suspend(cpu_policy, pmsg); if (ret) { printk(KERN_ERR "cpufreq: suspend failed in ->suspend " "step on CPU %u\n", cpu_policy->cpu); -- cgit v1.2.3