From 499bca9b6d3243f9278a1f5a22d00e67acdd844d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Amerigo Wang Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:23:46 -0500 Subject: [CPUFREQ] fix a lockdep warning There is no need to do sysfs_remove_link() or kobject_put() etc. when policy_rwsem_write is held, move them after releasing the lock. This fixes the lockdep warning: halt/4071 is trying to acquire lock: (s_active){++++.+}, at: [] .sysfs_addrm_finish+0x58/0xc0 but task is already holding lock: (&per_cpu(cpu_policy_rwsem, cpu)){+.+.+.}, at: [] .lock_policy_rwsem_write+0x84/0xf4 Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Signed-off-by: WANG Cong Cc: Johannes Berg Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi Signed-off-by: Dave Jones --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 19 ++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 2d5d575e889d..75d293eeb3ee 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1113,6 +1113,8 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct sys_device *sys_dev) unsigned int cpu = sys_dev->id; unsigned long flags; struct cpufreq_policy *data; + struct kobject *kobj; + struct completion *cmp; #ifdef CONFIG_SMP struct sys_device *cpu_sys_dev; unsigned int j; @@ -1141,10 +1143,11 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct sys_device *sys_dev) dprintk("removing link\n"); cpumask_clear_cpu(cpu, data->cpus); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); - sysfs_remove_link(&sys_dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); + kobj = &sys_dev->kobj; cpufreq_cpu_put(data); cpufreq_debug_enable_ratelimit(); unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); + sysfs_remove_link(kobj, "cpufreq"); return 0; } #endif @@ -1181,7 +1184,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct sys_device *sys_dev) data->governor->name, CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN); #endif cpu_sys_dev = get_cpu_sysdev(j); - sysfs_remove_link(&cpu_sys_dev->kobj, "cpufreq"); + kobj = &cpu_sys_dev->kobj; + unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); + sysfs_remove_link(kobj, "cpufreq"); + lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); cpufreq_cpu_put(data); } } @@ -1192,19 +1198,22 @@ static int __cpufreq_remove_dev(struct sys_device *sys_dev) if (cpufreq_driver->target) __cpufreq_governor(data, CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP); - kobject_put(&data->kobj); + kobj = &data->kobj; + cmp = &data->kobj_unregister; + unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); + kobject_put(kobj); /* we need to make sure that the underlying kobj is actually * not referenced anymore by anybody before we proceed with * unloading. */ dprintk("waiting for dropping of refcount\n"); - wait_for_completion(&data->kobj_unregister); + wait_for_completion(cmp); dprintk("wait complete\n"); + lock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); if (cpufreq_driver->exit) cpufreq_driver->exit(data); - unlock_policy_rwsem_write(cpu); free_cpumask_var(data->related_cpus); -- cgit v1.2.3 From fd187aaf980c45f1d16a94a846faa68e24de03c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dominik Brodowski Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2010 10:01:34 +0100 Subject: [CPUFREQ] use max load in conservative governor Instead of using the load of the last CPU in a package, use the maximum load of all CPUs in a package. Reported-by: Jean-Christian Goussard Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski Signed-off-by: Dave Jones --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'drivers/cpufreq') diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c index 599a40b25cb0..3a147874a465 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ static struct attribute_group dbs_attr_group_old = { static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info) { unsigned int load = 0; + unsigned int max_load = 0; unsigned int freq_target; struct cpufreq_policy *policy; @@ -501,6 +502,9 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info) continue; load = 100 * (wall_time - idle_time) / wall_time; + + if (load > max_load) + max_load = load; } /* @@ -511,7 +515,7 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info) return; /* Check for frequency increase */ - if (load > dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold) { + if (max_load > dbs_tuners_ins.up_threshold) { this_dbs_info->down_skip = 0; /* if we are already at full speed then break out early */ @@ -538,7 +542,7 @@ static void dbs_check_cpu(struct cpu_dbs_info_s *this_dbs_info) * can support the current CPU usage without triggering the up * policy. To be safe, we focus 10 points under the threshold. */ - if (load < (dbs_tuners_ins.down_threshold - 10)) { + if (max_load < (dbs_tuners_ins.down_threshold - 10)) { freq_target = (dbs_tuners_ins.freq_step * policy->max) / 100; this_dbs_info->requested_freq -= freq_target; -- cgit v1.2.3