From 4749f8196452eeb73cf2086a6a9705bae479d33d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kan Liang Date: Thu, 3 May 2018 11:25:08 -0700 Subject: perf/x86/intel/uncore: Correct fixed counter index check in generic code There is no index which is bigger than UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED. The only exception is client IMC uncore, which has been specially handled. For generic code, it is not correct to use >= to check fixed counter. The code quality issue will bring problem when a new counter index is introduced. Signed-off-by: Kan Liang Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: acme@kernel.org Cc: eranian@google.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1525371913-10597-3-git-send-email-kan.liang@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch') diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c index a7956fc7ca1d..3b0f93eb3cc0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void uncore_perf_event_update(struct intel_uncore_box *box, struct perf_event *e u64 prev_count, new_count, delta; int shift; - if (event->hw.idx >= UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED) + if (event->hw.idx == UNCORE_PMC_IDX_FIXED) shift = 64 - uncore_fixed_ctr_bits(box); else shift = 64 - uncore_perf_ctr_bits(box); -- cgit v1.2.3