From 82c62fa0c49aa305104013cee4468772799bb391 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Poimboeuf Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 11:21:35 -0500 Subject: x86/asm: Don't use the confusing '.ifeq' directive I find the '.ifeq ' directive to be confusing. Reading it quickly seems to suggest its opposite meaning, or that it's missing an argument. Improve readability by replacing all of its x86 uses with '.if == 0'. Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Cc: Andrei Vagin Cc: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Thomas Gleixner Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/757da028e802c7e98d23fbab8d234b1063e161cf.1508516398.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar --- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'arch/x86/entry') diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S index f6cdb7a1455e..846e84a1d1f7 100644 --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S @@ -817,7 +817,7 @@ ENTRY(\sym) ASM_CLAC - .ifeq \has_error_code + .if \has_error_code == 0 pushq $-1 /* ORIG_RAX: no syscall to restart */ .endif -- cgit v1.2.3