From 9ab3a15d95809a5d4feecda58b3749c53590e1b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:10:06 +0900
Subject: sh: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit

Follows the powerpc change, for much the same rationale.

Signed-off-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
---
 arch/sh/kernel/irq.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

(limited to 'arch/sh/kernel')

diff --git a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
index 91971103b62b..a3ee91971129 100644
--- a/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/sh/kernel/irq.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/ftrace.h>
 #include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
 #include <asm/machvec.h>
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
@@ -268,9 +269,8 @@ void migrate_irqs(void)
 			unsigned int newcpu = cpumask_any_and(data->affinity,
 							      cpu_online_mask);
 			if (newcpu >= nr_cpu_ids) {
-				if (printk_ratelimit())
-					printk(KERN_INFO "IRQ%u no longer affine to CPU%u\n",
-					       irq, cpu);
+				pr_info_ratelimited("IRQ%u no longer affine to CPU%u\n",
+						    irq, cpu);
 
 				cpumask_setall(data->affinity);
 				newcpu = cpumask_any_and(data->affinity,
-- 
cgit v1.2.3