From a5a1d1c2914b5316924c7893eb683a5420ebd3be Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thomas Gleixner Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 20:32:01 +0100 Subject: clocksource: Use a plain u64 instead of cycle_t There is no point in having an extra type for extra confusion. u64 is unambiguous. Conversion was done with the following coccinelle script: @rem@ @@ -typedef u64 cycle_t; @fix@ typedef cycle_t; @@ -cycle_t +u64 Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: John Stultz --- arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'arch/openrisc') diff --git a/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c b/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c index 50e970183dcd..687c11d048d7 100644 --- a/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c +++ b/arch/openrisc/kernel/time.c @@ -117,9 +117,9 @@ static __init void openrisc_clockevent_init(void) * is 32 bits wide and runs at the CPU clock frequency. */ -static cycle_t openrisc_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs) +static u64 openrisc_timer_read(struct clocksource *cs) { - return (cycle_t) mfspr(SPR_TTCR); + return (u64) mfspr(SPR_TTCR); } static struct clocksource openrisc_timer = { -- cgit v1.2.3